Cost effectiveness of three child mental health assessment methods: Computer-Assisted Assessment is effective and inexpensive

1990 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Yokley ◽  
David J. Coleman ◽  
Brian T. Yates
Author(s):  
Alice S. Carter ◽  
Rebecca DelCarmen-Wiggins

The second edition of the Oxford Handbook of Infant, Toddler, and Preschool Mental Health Assessment offers historical understandings and highlights recent enhancements in the assessment of infant, toddler, and preschool mental health. Authors present empirical findings across a variety of assessment methods and measures developed to capture variability in normative and psychopathological social-emotional development, including assessments of multiple dimensions of temperament, emotion regulation and dysregulation, behavior problems, social-emotional competencies, diagnostic symptoms, and diagnostic conditions. Notable in this edition is the consensus regarding the importance of identifying and assessing the relevant relational contexts in which early development is fostered. Also emphasized is the need for professionals to enhance their cultural awareness and responsiveness. Finally, greater dissemination of evidence-based young child mental health assessment methods is encouraged, which will require training interdisciplinary professionals in the cultural and domain expertise to identify and evaluate children with and at risk for clinically significant psychopathology.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rowella C. W. M. Kuijpers ◽  
Roy Otten ◽  
Ad A. Vermulst ◽  
Rutger C. M. E. Engels

Both clinicians and researchers agree on the value of self-report in child mental health assessment. The pictorial format of the computerized Dominic Interactive is an addition to the existing questionnaires, specifically concerning young children. Although prior studies on the Dominic Interactive reported favorable psychometric properties, the reliability was not always satisfactory for every scale, and no studies confirmed the proposed DSM-IV factor structure of the Dominic Interactive. This study examines these two psychometric aspects using a sample of 1,504 Dutch primary-school children aged 6–13 years. α was computed and compared with ω, an alternative index of reliability. CFA was conducted as was the measurement invariance at a configural, scalar, and metric level across both age and sex. The results showed that ω values were above .80, indicating good to high reliability for all scales. The DSM-IV factor structure was confirmed and proved to be identical across age groups and among both boys and girls in this sample. These findings lay the foundation for the meaningful use of the norms needed in clinical practice. They also contribute to the increasing value of the Dominic Interactive as a self-report instrument in child mental health screening.


2021 ◽  
pp. 263440412199996
Author(s):  
Michelle O’Reilly ◽  
Nikki Kiyimba

With the prevalence of child mental health conditions rising, the role of the initial mental health assessment is crucial in determining need. Utilising a critical discursive analytic framework, we explored the ways in which parents during these mental health assessments constructed the child’s difficulties as medicalised and doctorable as opposed to systemic and familial. Through this discursive positioning, we examined the ways in which parents mitigated blame and accounted for the child’s behaviours and emotions. Parents engaged in three accounting practices to construct the child’s problems as dispositional and to mitigate against an alternative familial system interpretation. First, they drew upon normative cultural repertoires of parenting. Second, they mediated ways whereby normative practices were deviated from in the best interest of the child. Third, they rhetorically positioned overcoming systemic difficulties by illustrating cooperative parenting in separated families. Our findings have implications for how parents build a case for the need for medical intervention in assessment settings.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle O'Reilly ◽  
Khalid Karim ◽  
Nikki Kiyimba

BackgroundThe mental health assessment is a fundamental aspect of clinical practice and central to this is the use of questions.AimsTo investigate the frequency and type of questions utilised within a child mental health assessment.MethodThe data consisted of 28 naturally occurring assessments from a UK child and adolescent mental health service. Data were analysed using quantitative and qualitative content analysis to determine frequencies and question type.ResultsResults indicated a total of 9086 questions in 41 h across the 28 clinical encounters. This equated to a mean of 3.7 questions per minute. Four types of questions were identified; yes–no interrogatives, wh-prefaced questions, declarative questions and tag questions.ConclusionsThe current format of questioning may impede the opportunity for families to fully express their particular concerns and this has implications for service delivery and training.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Hutchby ◽  
Michelle O’Reilly ◽  
Alison Drewett ◽  
Victoria Stafford

Based on a corpus of child mental health assessment meetings, this article explores how practitioners use reports on their own cognitive processing, such as I was just thinking or I’m just wondering, in interaction with children and adolescents presenting with potential mental health issues. Using the methods of conversation analysis, the findings reveal different ways in which this device is used to encourage the child to engage with a particular topic, interpretation, or version of events from the standpoint of subjective experience; in other words, to produce feelings-talk. The analysis contributes further towards the understanding of child–adult interaction in professional arenas of action: in this case child mental health assessments.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle A. Silva ◽  
Manuel Paris ◽  
Luis M. Añez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document