Denitrification capacity in a subterranean estuary below a Rhode Island fringing salt marsh

Estuaries ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 896-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Addy ◽  
Arthur Gold ◽  
Barbara Nowicki ◽  
James McKenna ◽  
Mark Stolt ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
pp. 333-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis C. Golet ◽  
Dennis H. A. Myshrall ◽  
Lawrence R. Oliver ◽  
Peter W. C. Paton ◽  
Brian C. Tefft

2012 ◽  
pp. 157-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin Chaffee ◽  
Wenley Ferguson ◽  
Marci Cole Ekberg

1973 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert V. Gessner ◽  
R. D. Goos

Spartina alterniflora, the dominant plant species of the tidal salt marshes on the east coast of the United States, contributes significantly to estuarine primary productivity. Energy stored by the plant is released through decomposition as detritus or decomposer biomass. The role of fungi in these transformations has not been elucidated and was investigated in the present study. Dried, dead grass was confined in nylon bags, exposed on a salt marsh and in an adjacent tidal creek in southern Rhode Island, and a quantitative and qualitative study made of the fungi found to be associated with the decomposing grass. Twenty-seven species of fungi were isolated. The average number of fungal colonies/g dry wt. of grass was found to be higher in material exposed on the salt marsh and subjected to immersion only at high tide (2436) than from material immersed in an adjacent creek (1021). The grass lost about 50% dry wt. after 6 months of exposure on the marsh.


2019 ◽  
Vol 231 ◽  
pp. 106435
Author(s):  
Kenneth B. Raposa ◽  
Robin L. Weber ◽  
Wenley Ferguson ◽  
Jeffrey Hollister ◽  
Ron Rozsa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary A. Neckles ◽  
James E. Lyons ◽  
Jessica L. Nagel ◽  
Susan C. Adamowicz ◽  
Toni Mikula ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-16
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
Jenny Walker

Abstract The AMAGuides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) is the most widely used basis for determining impairment and is used in state workers’ compensation systems, federal systems, automobile casualty, and personal injury, as well as by the majority of state workers’ compensation jurisdictions. Two tables summarize the edition of the AMA Guides used and provide information by state. The fifth edition (2000) is the most commonly used edition: California, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, New Hampshire, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, Vermont, and Washington. Eleven states use the sixth edition (2007): Alaska, Arizona, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Wyoming. Eight states still commonly make use of the fourth edition (1993): Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, South Dakota, Texas, and West Virginia. Two states use the Third Edition, Revised (1990): Colorado and Oregon. Connecticut does not stipulate which edition of the AMA Guides to use. Six states use their own state specific guidelines (Florida, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, and Wisconsin), and six states do not specify a specific guideline (Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, South Carolina, and Virginia). Statutes may or may not specify which edition of the AMA Guides to use. Some states use their own guidelines for specific problems and use the Guides for other issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document