Thermal shock/fatigue evaluation of FGM by AE technique

KSME Journal ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun-Hee Song ◽  
Jae-Kyoo Lim ◽  
H. Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Shock ◽  
Fatigue Evaluation

A controller for safe, convenient operation of LaB6 emitters on electron-beam instruments

1983 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 408-409
Author(s):  
W. J. Abramson ◽  
H. W. Estry ◽  
L. F. Allard
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Control System ◽  
Thermal Shock ◽  
Appropriate Care ◽  
Electron Guns ◽  
Tungsten Filaments ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
Main Components

LaB6 emitters are becoming increasingly popular as direct replacements for tungsten filaments in the electron guns of modern electron-beam instruments. These emitters offer order of magnitude increases in beam brightness, and, with appropriate care in operation, a corresponding increase in source lifetime. They are, however, an order of magnitude more expensive, and may be easily damaged (by improper vacuum conditions and thermal shock) during saturation/desaturation operations. These operations typically require several minutes of an operator's attention, which becomes tedious and subject to error, particularly since the emitter must be cooled during sample exchanges to minimize damage from random vacuum excursions. We have designed a control system for LaBg emitters which relieves the operator of the necessity for manually controlling the emitter power, minimizes the danger of accidental improper operation, and makes the use of these emitters routine on multi-user instruments.Figure 1 is a block schematic of the main components of the control system, and Figure 2 shows the control box.

Symptom Validity Testing

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Lee H. Ensalada
Keyword(s):  
Memory Deficits ◽  
Symptom Validity ◽  
Sensory Cues ◽  
Validity Testing ◽  
Symptom Validity Testing ◽  
Tunnel Vision ◽  
Blurry Vision ◽  
The Common ◽  
Fatigue Evaluation ◽  
Choice Testing

Abstract Symptom validity testing (SVT), also known as forced-choice testing, is a means of assessing the validity of sensory and memory deficits, including tactile anesthesias, paresthesias, blindness, color blindness, tunnel vision, blurry vision, and deafness. The common feature among these symptoms is a claimed inability to perceive or remember a sensory signal. SVT comprises two elements: a specific ability is assessed by presenting a large number of items in a multiple-choice format, and then the examinee's performance is compared to the statistical likelihood of success based on chance alone. These tests usually present two alternatives; thus the probability of simply guessing the correct response (equivalent to having no ability at all) is 50%. Thus, scores significantly below chance performance indicate that the sensory cues must have been perceived, but the examinee chose not to report the correct answer—alternative explanations are not apparent. SVT also has the capacity to demonstrate that the examinee performed below the probabilities of chance. Scoring below a norm can be explained by fatigue, evaluation anxiety, inattention, or limited intelligence. Scoring below the probabilities of chance alone most likely indicates deliberate deceptions and is evidence of malingering because it provides strong evidence that the examinee received the sensory cues and denied the perception. Even so, malingering must be evaluated from the total clinical context.

Impairment Questions and Answers

1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-4
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Validity ◽  
Validity Testing ◽  
Symptom Validity Testing ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Tunnel Vision ◽  
Questions And Answers ◽  
Blurry Vision ◽  
Fatigue Evaluation ◽  
Choice Testing ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Symptom validity testing, also known as forced-choice testing, is a way to assess the validity of sensory and memory deficits, including tactile anesthesias, paresthesias, blindness, color blindness, tunnel vision, blurry vision, and deafness—the common feature of which is a claimed inability to perceive or remember a sensory signal. Symptom validity testing comprises two elements: A specific ability is assessed by presenting a large number of items in a multiple-choice format, and then the examinee's performance is compared with the statistical likelihood of success based on chance alone. Scoring below a norm can be explained in many different ways (eg, fatigue, evaluation anxiety, limited intelligence, and so on), but scoring below the probabilities of chance alone most likely indicates deliberate deception. The positive predictive value of the symptom validity technique likely is quite high because there is no alternative explanation to deliberate distortion when performance is below the probability of chance. The sensitivity of this technique is not likely to be good because, as with a thermometer, positive findings indicate that a problem is present, but negative results do not rule out a problem. Although a compelling conclusion is that the examinee who scores below probabilities is deliberately motivated to perform poorly, malingering must be concluded from the total clinical context.

Degradation Behavior of TiN Coatings with Different Thicknesses after a Pulsed Laser Thermal Shock Test

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 729-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seol Jeon ◽  
Youngkue Choi ◽  
Hyun-Gyoo Shin ◽  
Hyun Park ◽  
Heesoo Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Shock ◽  
Pulsed Laser ◽  
Thermal Shock Test ◽  
Degradation Behavior ◽  
Shock Test ◽  
Tin Coatings

Structure Evolution of 7YSZ Thermal Barrier Coating During Thermal Shock Testing

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1261
Author(s):  
ZHANG Xiao-Feng ◽  
ZHOU Ke-Song ◽  
ZHANG Ji-Fu ◽  
ZHANG Yong ◽  
LIU Min ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Shock ◽  
Thermal Barrier Coating ◽  
Structure Evolution ◽  
Thermal Barrier ◽  
Shock Testing ◽  
Barrier Coating

Influence of the Zinc Sublayer Method Production and Heat Treatment on the Microhardness of the Composite Ni-Al2O3 Coating Deposited on the 5754 Aluminium Alloy

2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 355-358
Author(s):  
M. Karaś ◽  
M. Nowak ◽  
M. Opyrchał ◽  
M. Bigaj ◽  
A. Najder
Keyword(s):  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Aluminium Alloy ◽  
Thermal Shock ◽  
Nickel Coating ◽  
Nickel Sulphate ◽  
Al2o3 Coating ◽  
Nickel Coatings ◽  
Watts Bath ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Zinc Interlayer

Abstract In this study, the effect of zinc interlayer on the adhesion of nickel coatings reinforced with micrometric Al2O3 particles was examined. Nickel coating was applied by electroplating on EN AW - 5754 aluminium alloy using Watts bath at a concentration of 150 g/l of nickel sulphate with the addition of 50 g/l of Al2O3. The influence of zinc intermediate coating deposited in single, double and triple layers on the adhesion of nickel coating to aluminium substrate was also studied. The adhesion was measured by the thermal shock technique in accordance with PN-EN ISO 2819. The microhardness of nickel coating before and after heat treatment was additionally tested. It was observed that the number of zinc interlayers applied does not significantly affect the adhesion of nickel which is determined by thermal shock. No defect that occurs after the test, such as delamination, blistering or peeling of the coating was registered. Microhardness of the nickel coatings depends on the heat treatment and the amount of zinc in the interlayer. For both single and double zinc interlayer, the microhardness of the nickel coating containing Al2O3 particles increased after heat treatment, but decreased when a triple zinc interlayer was applied.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document