The Changing Face of the U.S. Steel Industry

JOM ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Robert W. Crandall
Keyword(s):  
Steel Industry ◽  
The U.S

Technological Change, Market Decline, and Industrial Relations in the U.S. Steel Industry

1987 ◽  
pp. 229-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis A. Ahlburg ◽  
Ann E. Carey ◽  
Bruce A. Lundgren ◽  
Sandra L. Barrett ◽  
Lawrence D. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Technological Change ◽  
Steel Industry ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
The U.S

scholarly journals Imports as a cause of injury: The case of the U.S. steel industry

1986 ◽  
Vol 20 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 201-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gene M. Grossman
Keyword(s):  
Steel Industry ◽  
The U.S

scholarly journals Meta-Strategic Lobbying: The 1998 Steel Imports Case

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Brook
Keyword(s):  
Steel Industry ◽  
The United States ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Policy Choices ◽  
Strategic Approach ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Governmental Response ◽  
Comparative Examination ◽  
Different Levels ◽  
The U.S

In 1998, the domestic steel industry in the United States devised and executed a complex and sophisticated effort to achieve an effective non-market response to a sudden, persistent, and damaging surge of imported steel. This campaign lasted until 2002, when President George W. Bush invoked Section 201 of the U.S. trade laws to impose tariffs on imports of most steel products. This case of the steel industry's trade policy campaign provides an opportunity to examine selected models of protection-seeking industries and lobbying to ask why and how the steel coalition achieved this extraordinary governmental response. These questions are explored though a descriptive case of the steel industry's protection-seeking campaign followed by a comparative examination of previous models of protection-seeking firms, and lobbying to achieve protectionist policies. A comparison with selected models of the determinants of protection-seeking and factors affecting lobbying strategies show that most, almost all, were present in the steel case. In fact, a meta-strategic approach that transcends the customary understanding of lobbying is suggested in a complex policy environment. Such an environment can be characterized by: the need to influence multiple governmental entities – legislative, regulatory, executive; the desire for multiple outcomes with varying levels of specificity – laws or resolutions, administrative rulings, policy choices; interactions between different levels and branches of government; employment of coordinated interrelated lobbying techniques; and simultaneity of these factors.

Mini-Mills: A New Growth Path for the U.S. Steel Industry?

1988 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1179-1200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Scherrer
Keyword(s):  
Steel Industry ◽  
Growth Path ◽  
The U.S

Innovation and technical change in the U.S. steel industry

Technovation ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltan J. Acs
Keyword(s):  
Technical Change ◽  
Steel Industry ◽  
The U.S
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document