A novel strategy for multi-part production in additive manufacturing

2020 ◽  
Vol 109 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 1237-1248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingchao Jiang ◽  
Xun Xu ◽  
Yi Xiong ◽  
Yunlong Tang ◽  
Guoying Dong ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1178-1192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siavash H. Khajavi ◽  
Jan Holmström ◽  
Jouni Partanen

PurposeInnovative startups have begun a trend using laser sintering (LS) technology patents expiration, namely, by introducing LS additive manufacturing (AM) machines that can overcome utilization barriers, such as the costliness of machines and productivity limitation. The recent rise of this trend has led the authors to investigate this new class of machines in novel settings, including hub configuration. There are various supply chain configurations to supply spare parts in industrial operations. This paper aims to explore the promise of a production configuration that combines the benefits of centralized production with the flexibility of local manufacturing without the huge costs related to it.Design/methodology/approachThis study quantitatively examines the feasibility of different AM-enabled spare parts supply chain configurations. Using cost data extracted from a case study, three scenarios per AM machine technology are modeled and compared.FindingsResults suggest that hub production configuration depending on the utilized AM machines can provide economic efficiency and effectiveness to reduce equipment downtime. While previous studies have suggested the need for AM machines with efficiency for single part production for a distributed supply chain, the findings in this research illustrate the positive relationship between multi-part production capability and the feasibility of a hub manufacturing configuration establishment.Originality/valueThis study explores the promise of a production configuration that combines the benefits of centralized production with the flexibility of local manufacturing without the huge costs related to it. Although the existing body of knowledge contains research on production decentralization, research on various levels of decentralization is lacking. Using a real-world case study, this study aims to compare the feasibility of different levels of decentralization for AM-enabled spare parts supply chains.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostapha El Jai ◽  
Iatimad AKHRIF ◽  
Nourddin Saidou

Abstract In this paper, the authors propose a novel strategy of 2D scanning that might be adapted for any additive manufacturing process. The featured novelty corresponds to a Skeleton Based Perpendicularly (SBP) of the 2D shape of each slice. Thus, it is proposed to minimize the total production time of a given layer under some constraints. In other word, it is proposed to study the competitiveness conditions of the new scanning technique regarding the classical chess scanning strategy from a productivity perspective. In order to introduce this new technique, the paper treats the case of a rectangular layer. The competitiveness of the proposed technique was discussed according to chess decomposition parameters, the hatch space distance, and the dimensions of the primitive rectangle layer to analyze. The indicators introduced corresponds to “the gain of production time” and “the specific gain of production time per surface unit”; then, these latter were computed and discussed in two separated cases of study. The findings show that, by the adoption of the SBP technique instead the chess scanning strategy, it is possible to save about 3% to 45% of production time gain for the first case of study. The gain of production time per surface unit was analyzed in the second case of study. The correspondent analysis permitted to highlight the percentage of gain of time related to the area to scan. Indeed, the gain per surface unit varies between 4.32×10-6%/mm2 and 6.96×10-05%/mm2. In one hand, these indicators depend linearly on the decomposition strategy of the central area of the SBP technique and also according to the rectangle dimensions. In addition, for the lowest values of hatch space, around 25µm, the two techniques in competition present quasi-similar production time, where the variations between them is minimal. Nevertheless, starting from 65µm, the SBP scanning strategy present considerable less time of production judged as exponentially decreasing according to the hatch space distance. Finally, one can see that the scanning model proposed could present major contributions in other scientific and technical fields that use surface control as territorial security, water adduction and distribution, telecommunication, etc. by varying and adapting the decision variables according to each field of study.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 15-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Masoomi ◽  
Scott M. Thompson ◽  
Nima Shamsaei

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Post ◽  
Alex Roschli ◽  
Jesse Heineman ◽  
Phillip Chesser ◽  
John Lindahl ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hossein Sehhat ◽  
Ali Mahdianikhotbesara ◽  
Farzad Yadegari

Abstract The widespread use of Additive Manufacturing (AM) has been extensively progressed in the past decade due to the convenience provided by AM in rapid and reliable part production. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) has witnessed even faster growth of application as its equipment is environmentally-friendly and easily adaptable. This increased use of FDM to manufacture prototypes and finished parts is accompanied by concerns that 3D printed parts do not perform the same as relatively homogeneous parts produced by molding or machining. As the interface between two faces of bonded material may be modeled by stress elements, in theory by modeling 3D printed layers subjected to tension at varying angles as transformed stress elements, the stress required to break the layer bonds can be determined. To evaluate such a relationship, in this study, the stresses calculated from stress transformation were compared with the behavior of 3D printed specimens subjected to tensile loads.


Procedia CIRP ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 306-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel-Alexander Türk ◽  
Ralph Kussmaul ◽  
Markus Zogg ◽  
Christoph Klahn ◽  
Bastian Leutenecker-Twelsiek ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1393-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yicha Zhang ◽  
Alain Bernard ◽  
Ramy Harik ◽  
K. P. Karunakaran

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document