Repeated congestion games with bounded rationality

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Scarsini ◽  
Tristan Tomala
Keyword(s):  
Bounded Rationality ◽  
Congestion Games

(Un)Bounded Rationality

1985 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-265
Author(s):  
Donald E. Broadbent
Keyword(s):  
Bounded Rationality

Agent-Based Computational Model

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua M. Epstein
Keyword(s):  
Computational Model ◽  
Bounded Rationality ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Spatially Explicit ◽  
Agent Based ◽  
Affective Component ◽  
Elementary Type ◽  
Social Component ◽  
Different Time Scales

This part describes the agent-based and computational model for Agent_Zero and demonstrates its capacity for generative minimalism. It first explains the replicability of the model before offering an interpretation of the model by imagining a guerilla war like Vietnam, Afghanistan, or Iraq, where events transpire on a 2-D population of contiguous yellow patches. Each patch is occupied by a single stationary indigenous agent, which has two possible states: inactive and active. The discussion then turns to Agent_Zero's affective component and an elementary type of bounded rationality, as well as its social component, with particular emphasis on disposition, action, and pseudocode. Computational parables are then presented, including a parable relating to the slaughter of innocents through dispositional contagion. This part also shows how the model can capture three spatially explicit examples in which affect and probability change on different time scales.

Reasonable Bounds on Rationality

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Grossmann ◽  
Richard Eibach
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Bounded Rationality ◽  
Cognitive Resources ◽  
Previous Theory ◽  
Making Choices ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Sound Judgment

Previous theory and research on bounded rationality has emphasized how limited cognitive resources constrain people from making utility maximizing choices. This paper expands the concept of bounded rationality to consider how people’s rationality may be constrained by their internalization of a qualitatively distinct standard for sound judgment, which is commonly labeled reasonableness. In contrast to rationality, the standard of reasonableness provides guidance for making choices in situations that involve balancing incommensurable values and interests or reconciling conflicting points-of-view. We review recent evidence showing that laypeople readily recognize the distinctions between rationality and reasonableness and thus are able to utilize these as distinct standards to inform their everyday decision-making. The fact that people appear to have internalized rationality and reasonableness as distinct standards of sound judgment supports the notion that people’s pursuit of rationality may be bounded by their determination to also be reasonable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document