Toxicities of opioid analgesics: respiratory depression, histamine release, hemodynamic changes, hypersensitivity, serotonin toxicity

Author(s):  
Brian A. Baldo
1991 ◽  
Vol 33 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 20-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ennis ◽  
C. Schneider ◽  
E. Nehring ◽  
W. Lorenz

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 1027-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Dahan ◽  
Rutger van der Schrier ◽  
Terry Smith ◽  
Leon Aarts ◽  
Monique van Velzen ◽  
...  

Abstract The ventilatory control system is highly vulnerable to exogenous administered opioid analgesics. Particularly respiratory depression is a potentially lethal complication that may occur when opioids are overdosed or consumed in combination with other depressants such as sleep medication or alcohol. Fatalities occur in acute and chronic pain patients on opioid therapy and individuals that abuse prescription or illicit opioids for their hedonistic pleasure. One important strategy to mitigate opioid-induced respiratory depression is cotreatment with nonopioid respiratory stimulants. Effective stimulants prevent respiratory depression without affecting the analgesic opioid response. Several pharmaceutical classes of nonopioid respiratory stimulants are currently under investigation. The majority acts at sites within the brainstem respiratory network including drugs that act at α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (ampakines), 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor agonists, phospodiesterase-4 inhibitors, D1-dopamine receptor agonists, the endogenous peptide glycyl-glutamine, and thyrotropin-releasing hormone. Others act peripherally at potassium channels expressed on oxygen-sensing cells of the carotid bodies, such as doxapram and GAL021 (Galleon Pharmaceuticals Corp., USA). In this review we critically appraise the efficacy of these agents. We conclude that none of the experimental drugs are adequate for therapeutic use in opioid-induced respiratory depression and all need further study of efficacy and toxicity. All discussed drugs, however, do highlight potential mechanisms of action and possible templates for further study and development.


1992 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
M. ENNIS ◽  
C. SCHNEIDER ◽  
E. NEHRING ◽  
W. LORENA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iris Bachmutsky ◽  
Adelae Durand ◽  
Kevin Yackle

AbstractOpioids are perhaps the most effective analgesics in medicine. However, from 1999 to 2018, they also killed more than 400,000 people in the United States by suppressing breathing, a common side-effect known as opioid induced respiratory depression. This doubled-edged sword has inspired the dream of developing novel therapeutics that provide opioid-like analgesia without respiratory depression. One such approach has been to develop so-called ‘biased agonists’ that activate some, but not all pathways downstream of the µ-opioid receptor (MOR), the target of morphine and other opioid analgesics. This hypothesis stems from a study suggesting that MOR-mediated activation of ß2-Arrestin is the downstream signaling pathway responsible for respiratory depression, whereas inhibition of adenylyl cyclase produces analgesia. To further verify this model, which represents the motivation for the biased agonist approach, we examined respiratory behavior in mice lacking the gene for ß2-Arrestin. Contrary to previous findings, we find no correlation between ß2-Arrestin function and opioid-induced respiratory depression, suggesting that any effect of biased agonists must be mediated through an as-yet to be identified signaling mechanism.


2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3-8
Author(s):  
Albert Dahan

When selecting the appropriate long-acting opioid to treat cancer pain, both analgesic efficacy and safety need consideration. Generally, opioids are well tolerated. However, of opioid-typical adverse events, respiratory depression is especially important because of the risk of a fatal outcome. Although all potent opioid analgesics act via the μ-opioid receptor system, they differ in how they affect respiratory control. Recently, the respiratory effects of fentanyl (1 - 7 μg/kg) and buprenorphine (0.7 - 9 μg g/kg) were compared in healthy opioidnaïve volunteers. Fentanyl produced dose-dependent depression of respiration with apnoea at doses ≥3 μg/kg, while buprenorphine caused depression that levelled at ~50% of baseline with doses ≥2 μg/kg. These findings indicate the occurrence of a ceiling in the respiratory depression induced by buprenorphine but not by fentanyl. Surprisingly few studies have addressed the clinically important ability to reverse the respiratory effects of opioids. A recent assessment of the naloxone dose required to reverse 0.2 μg intravenous buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression in healthy opioid-naïve volunteers, found that the accumulated naloxone dose causing 50% reversal of respiratory depression was 1.20∓0.32 μg/70 kg (given in 30 min); 80% reversal was observed at 2.50∓0.60 μg/70 kg (given in 30 min). At greater buprenorphine doses, full reversal is observed when the duration of naloxone infusion is increased. These findings indicate the need for a continuous rather than bolus administration of naloxone to reverse the respiratory effects of buprenorphine. In conclusion, buprenorphine is more favourable compared with fentanyl in respect to ventilatory control. Buprenorphine causes limited respiratory depression with a ceiling effect at higher doses, while fentanyl causes dose-dependent respiratory depression with apnoea at high dose levels. In the rare instance of respiratory depression, reversal is possible with a sufficient and continuous infusion of naloxone.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
A. Alao ◽  
C. Chung ◽  
S. Sachdeva

Case presentation:We report a case of a 27-year-old Iraq War veteran with no previous psychiatric history who sustained severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) following a blast injury from an improvised explosive device. The patient subsequently suffered severe anxiety symptoms controlled only with combined therapy with benzodiazepines and venlafaxine. Even more disabling, the patient also experienced intractable headache and shoulder pain unresponsive to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, tramadol, gabapentin, or NMDA-receptor antagonists. Given the risk of respiratory depression with his current medications, opioid analgesics were not favored for the management of his pain. The patient was started on sublingual buprenorphine at a dose of 8mg three times daily with significant improvement. This dose was maintained and the patient was able to function relatively pain-free.Conclusion:Chronic pain is a significant complication in patients with TBI and is reported by a majority of patients with TBI, regardless of the severity of the injury. The treatment of chronic pain among individuals can be challenging. Patients with TBI may be on other medications for impulse control, such as anticonvulsants and benzodiazepines. Further treatment with narcotic analgesics may therefore increase the risk of respiratory depression. Buprenorphine is a partial mu agonist whose effects plateau at higher doses, at which time it begins to act like an antagonist. It is this property at higher doses that limits its dose-dependent respiratory depression. Buprenorphine thus has the advantage of effective analgesia with minimal sedation and may be useful to treat chronic pain among TBI patients already taking benzodiazepines.


Author(s):  
Jordan T. Bateman ◽  
Erica S. Levitt

Respiratory depression is a potentially fatal side effect of opioid analgesics and major limitation to their use. G-protein-biased opioid agonists have been proposed as "safer" analgesics with less respiratory depression. These agonists are biased to activate G proteins rather than β-arrestin signaling. Respiratory depression has been shown to correlate with both G-protein bias and intrinsic efficacy, and recent work has refuted the role of β-arrestin signaling in opioid-induced respiratory depression. In addition, there is substantial evidence that G-proteins do, in fact, mediate respiratory depression by actions in respiratory-controlling brainstem neurons. Based on these studies, we provide the perspective that protection from respiratory depression displayed by newly developed G-protein biased agonists is due to factors other than G-protein versus arrestin bias.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document