scholarly journals Pharmacogenetic association of diabetes-associated genetic risk score with rapid progression of coronary artery calcification following treatment with HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors —results of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study

Author(s):  
Sonali Pechlivanis ◽  
Dominik Jung ◽  
Susanne Moebus ◽  
Nils Lehmann ◽  
Amir A. Mahabadi ◽  
...  

AbstractHMG-CoA-Reductase inhibitors (HMGRIs) are currently the most widely used group of drugs in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and are given preemptively to patients with high levels of cholesterol, including those with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, intake of HMGRIs also increases the progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC) and the risk of developing DM. This study aimed to investigate whether HMGRI intake interacts with the diabetes-associated genetic risk score (GRS) to affect CAC progression using data from the population-based Heinz Nixdorf Recall (HNR) study. CAC was measured in 3157 participants using electron-beam computed tomography twice, at baseline (CACb) and 5 years later (CAC5y). CAC progression was classified as slow, expected, or rapid based on predicted values. Weighted DM GRS was constructed using 100 diabetes mellitus–associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We used log-linear regression to evaluate the interaction of HMGRI intake with diabetes-associated GRS and individual SNPs on CAC progression (rapid vs. expected/slow), adjusting for age, sex, and log(CACb + 1). The prevalence of rapid CAC progression in the HNR study was 19.6%. We did not observe any association of the weighted diabetes mellitus GRS with the rapid progression of CAC (relative risk (RR) [95% confidence interval (95% CI)]: 1.01 [0.94; 1.10]). Furthermore, no indication of an interaction between GRS and HMGRI intake was observed (1.08 [0.83; 1.41]). Our analyses showed no indication that the impact of HMGRIs on CAC progression is significantly more severe in patients with a high genetic risk of developing DM than in those with a low GRS.

1999 ◽  
Vol 147 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikko J Järvisalo ◽  
Jyri O Toikka ◽  
Tommi Vasankari ◽  
Jorma Mikkola ◽  
Jorma S.A Viikari ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e0166994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias L. Salfati ◽  
David M. Herrington ◽  
Themistocles L. Assimes

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Sousa ◽  
M Mendonca ◽  
A Pereira ◽  
F Mendonca ◽  
M Neto ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The complex interaction between genes and environmental factors contribute to individual-level risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), often resulting in premature CAD. The role for genetic risk scores in premature CAD is still controversial. Objective To evaluate the importance of conventional risk factors and of a genetic risk score in younger and older patients with coronary artery disease Methods From a group of 1619 pts with angiographic documented CAD from the GENEMACOR study, we selected 1276 pts admitted for ACS and analysed them in 2 groups (group A: ≤50 years, n=491 pts, 87.2% male, mean age 44±4.9 and group B: >50 years, n=785 pts, 75.2% male, mean age 57±4.2). Univariate analysis was used to characterize the traits of each group and we used ROC curves and respective AUCs to evaluate the power of genetics in the prediction of CAD, through a Genetic Risk Score (GRS). Results 99.3% of the young patients had at least one modifiable risk factor, 18.4% had 2 modifiable risk factors and 75.2% had 3 or more modifiable risk factors. The pattern of risk factors contributing to CAD were different among groups: family history (A: 27.5%, B: 21.4%, p=0.015) and smoking habits (A: 64.8%, B: 42.9%, p<0.001) were more frequent among patients under 50, and traditional age-linked factors like hypertension (A: 58%, B: 75.7%, p<0.001), diabetes (A: 21.6%, B: 38.6%, p<0.001) were more common in the older group. Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction was more frequent among the young (A: 55.4%, B: 47.4%, p=0.006), as non-ST clinical presentation was higher among elder patients. Regarding angiographic presentation, single vessel CAD was higher in group A (A: 50.3%, B: 40.9%, p<0.001), while multivessel diasease was higher in group B (A: 33.3%, B: 53.9%, p<0.001). At a mean follow-up of 5 years, older patients had a worst prognosis, registering a higher rate of cardiovascular death (A: 4.1%, B: 8.6%, p=0.002) and higher MACE (A: 26.8%, B: 31%, p=0.128),. Adding the genetic risk score (GRS), we achieved only a slight improvement in the AUC for predicting CAD (0.796->0.805, p=0.0178 and 0.748->0.761, p=0.0007 in patients under and over 50, respectively). Conclusion Coronary artery disease is not all the same, as premature CAD shares a unique and specific pattern of risk factors, clinical presentation, angiographic severity and prognosis. Genetics should not be used as an excuse to justify premature CAD, as there is frequently more than one potentially reversible risk factor present even in young patients and the additive predictive value of GRS is modest.


2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. e12956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreia Pereira ◽  
Maria Isabel Mendonca ◽  
Ana Célia Sousa ◽  
Sofia Borges ◽  
Sónia Freitas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document