scholarly journals The monosynaptic Ia afferent pathway can largely explain the stretch duration effect of the long latency M2 response

2008 ◽  
Vol 193 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasper Schuurmans ◽  
Erwin de Vlugt ◽  
Alfred C. Schouten ◽  
Carel G. M. Meskers ◽  
Jurriaan H. de Groot ◽  
...  
1991 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1089-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Noth ◽  
M. Schwarz ◽  
K. Podoll ◽  
F. Motamedi

1. The aim of the present study was to identify the type of spinal afferents involved in the generation of the long-latency response in intrinsic human hand muscles. Position-controlled extensions were imposed on the index finger or on the wrist of healthy subjects who were exerting a steady voluntary flexion force at the relevant joint. Averaged surface electromyographic (EMG) responses of the first dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI) or of the wrist flexors were evaluated with respect to latency and size. 2. Small transient angular displacements of the index finger (1 degree, as measured at the metacarpophalangeal joint), which are supposed to excite primary rather than secondary afferents, evoked two clearly discernible EMG responses with mean latencies of 32.3 ms (M1 response) and 54.7 ms (M2 response), respectively. The size of the M2 response exceeded the size of the M1 response by 60%. In the wrist flexors, transient stretch (1 degree) gave rise to a large M1 response (latency 22.8 ms) and a small, inconstent M2 response. 3. Small-amplitude vibration of the index finger elicited EMG responses in the FDI that were qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those seen in response to small transient stretches of the index finger. This was also true for fast ramp-and-hold stretches (stretch velocity 400 degrees/s, amplitude 5 degrees), whereas slow ramp-and-hold stretches (125 degrees/s, 5 degrees) elicited predominantly M2 responses. 4. In the FDI, the mechanical threshold of the M1 and M2 response to the transient angular displacement was approximately 0.15 degrees, with a tendency for the M2 response to appear at a lower threshold.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1604-1618 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Darton ◽  
O. C. Lippold ◽  
M. Shahani ◽  
U. Shahani

Stretching human muscles with a mechanical device gave rise to multiple peaks in the rectified and averaged electromyogram. In the first dorsal interosseous the latency of the first peak (M1) was 32.4 +/- 2.4 ms (SD) and the latency of the second peak (M2) was 55.1 +/- 11.3 ms, in both cases measured from the time of the stimulus to the take-off point of the peak. Often a third peak (M3) was seen, having a considerably longer latency. The origin of peak M1 was considered to be in the stretch reflex arc because of its latency and its invariable association with muscle movement. Peak M2 was due to stimulation of afferent terminals in the skin and/or subcutaneous tissues by the mechanical device producing the muscle stretch. The conduction velocity of the pathway involved in the generation of the M1 component is the same as that for M2. This implies that central processing in the spinal cord delays the M2 response. The M2 mechanism does not involve a transcortical (long-loop) pathway because in foot muscles the M1-M2 delay remains the same as is found for hand muscles, although M1 latency is prolonged (to 39.4 +/- 6.2 ms for extensor digitorum longus). This indicates that there is not time for M2 impulses to traverse a pathway any longer than that passing to and from the spinal cord.


2009 ◽  
Vol 201 (4) ◽  
pp. 681-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carel G. M. Meskers ◽  
Alfred C. Schouten ◽  
Marieke M. L. Rich ◽  
Jurriaan H. de Groot ◽  
Jasper Schuurmans ◽  
...  

1977 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 626-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. K. Knox ◽  
S. Kubota ◽  
R. E. Poppele

1. Responses of DSCT neurons to random electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves of the hindleg at group I intensity were studied using cross-correlation analysis of the output spike train with the stimulus. Three types of response were found: type 1 was due to monosynaptic activation of DSCT cells, type 2 resulted from inhibition of those cells, and type 3 was due to a long-latency excitation that was probably polysynaptic. 2. Most of the units studied responded to stimulation of both proximal and distal flexor and extensor nerves. The extensive convergence of afferent input on DSCT cells is much greater than has been observed previously, with type 2 and type 3 responses totaling 80% of the observed responses. We attribute this to the sensitivity of the analysis in detecting small changes in postsynaptic excitability. 3. The results of the study, particularly the derivation of postsynaptic excitability changes, generally confirm those of earlier work employing intracellular recording. 4. By varying stimulus rate and stimulus intensity in the group 1 range and simulating the resulting correlations, we conclude that excitability changes in DSCT cells are the net result of complex interactions involving excitation and inhibition. A summary of these findings is presented as a model for the minimum circuitry necessary to account for the observed behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document