scholarly journals Altered tuning in primary motor cortex does not account for behavioral adaptation during force field learning

2017 ◽  
Vol 235 (9) ◽  
pp. 2689-2704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew G. Perich ◽  
Lee E. Miller
2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (11) ◽  
pp. 3144-3154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew G. Richardson ◽  
Tommaso Borghi ◽  
Emilio Bizzi

Neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1) have been shown to have persistent, memory-like activity following adaptation to altered movement dynamics. However, the techniques used to study these memory traces limited recordings to only single sessions lasting no more than a few hours. Here, chronically implanted microelectrode arrays were used to study the long-term neuronal responses to repeated experience with perturbing, velocity-dependent force fields. Force-field–related neuronal activity within each session was similar to that found previously. That is, the directional tuning curves of the M1 neurons shifted in a manner appropriate to compensate for the forces. Next, the across-session behavior was examined. Long-term learning was evident in the performance improvements across multiple force-field sessions. Correlated with this change, the neuronal population had smaller within-session spike rate changes as experience with the force field increased. The smaller within-session changes were a result of persistent across-session shifts in directional tuning. The results extend the observation of memory traces of newly learned dynamics and provide further evidence for the role of M1 in early motor memory formation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 487-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Touria Addou ◽  
Nedialko I. Krouchev ◽  
John F. Kalaska

To elucidate how primary motor cortex (M1) neurons contribute to the performance of a broad range of different and even incompatible motor skills, we trained two monkeys to perform single-degree-of-freedom elbow flexion/extension movements that could be perturbed by a variety of externally generated force fields. Fields were presented in a pseudorandom sequence of trial blocks. Different computer monitor background colors signaled the nature of the force field throughout each block. There were five different force fields: null field without perturbing torque, assistive and resistive viscous fields proportional to velocity, a resistive elastic force field proportional to position and a resistive viscoelastic field that was the linear combination of the resistive viscous and elastic force fields. After the monkeys were extensively trained in the five field conditions, neural recordings were subsequently made in M1 contralateral to the trained arm. Many caudal M1 neurons altered their activity systematically across most or all of the force fields in a manner that was appropriate to contribute to the compensation for each of the fields. The net activity of the entire sample population likewise provided a predictive signal about the differences in the time course of the external forces encountered during the movements across all force conditions. The neurons showed a broad range of sensitivities to the different fields, and there was little evidence of a modular structure by which subsets of M1 neurons were preferentially activated during movements in specific fields or combinations of fields.


2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 768-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Cherian ◽  
Hugo L. Fernandes ◽  
Lee E. Miller

We often make reaching movements having similar trajectories within very different mechanical environments, for example, with and without an added load in the hand. Under these varying conditions, our kinematic intentions must be transformed into muscle commands that move the limbs. Primary motor cortex (M1) has been implicated in the neural mechanism that mediates this adaptation to new movement dynamics, but our recent experiments suggest otherwise. We have recorded from electrode arrays that were chronically implanted in M1 as monkeys made reaching movements under two different dynamic conditions: the movements were opposed by either a clockwise or counterclockwise velocity-dependent force field acting at the hand. Under these conditions, the preferred direction (PD) of neural discharge for nearly all neurons rotated in the direction of the applied field, as did those of proximal limb electromyograms (EMGs), although the median neural rotation was significantly smaller than that of muscles. For a given neuron, the rotation angle was very consistent, even across multiple sessions. Within the limits of measurement uncertainty, both the neural and EMG changes occurred nearly instantaneously, reaching a steady state despite ongoing behavioral adaptation. Our results suggest that M1 is not directly involved in the adaptive changes that occurred within an experimental session. Rather, most M1 neurons are directly related to the dynamics of muscle activation that themselves reflect the external load. It appears as though gain modulation, the differential recruitment of M1 neurons by higher motor areas, can account for the load and behavioral adaptation-related changes in M1 discharge.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bosc ◽  
G. Bucchioni ◽  
B. Ribot ◽  
T. Michelet

AbstractBehavioral adaptation, a central feature of voluntary movement, is known to rely on top-down cognitive control. For example, the conflict-adaptation effect on tasks such as the Stroop task leads to better performance (e.g. shorter reaction time) for incongruent trials following an already incongruent one. The role of higher-order cortices in such between-trial adjustments is well documented, however, a specific involvement of the primary motor cortex (M1) has seldom been questioned. Here we studied changes in corticospinal excitability associated with the conflict-adaptation process. For this, we used single-pulse transcranial-magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied between two consecutive trials in an interference flanker task, while measuring motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) after agonistic and antagonistic voluntary movements. In agonist movement, MEP amplitude was modulated by recent movement history with an increase favoring movement repetition, but no significant change in MEP size was observed whether a previous trial was incongruent or congruent. Critically, for an antagonist movement, the relative size of MEPs following incongruent trials correlated positively with the strength of behavioral adaptation measured as the degree of RT shortening across subjects. This post-conflict increase in corticospinal excitability related to antagonist muscle recruitment could compensate for a potential deleterious bias due to recent movement history that favors the last executed action. Namely, it prepares the motor system to rapidly adapt to a changing and unpredictable context by equalizing the preparation for all possible motor responses.


1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 769
Author(s):  
Ho Kyu Lee ◽  
Jin Suh Kim ◽  
Youn Mee Hwang ◽  
Myung Joon Lee ◽  
Soo Mee Lim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document