Motor cortex single-neuron and population contributions to compensation for multiple dynamic force fields

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 487-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Touria Addou ◽  
Nedialko I. Krouchev ◽  
John F. Kalaska
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Force Field ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Force Fields ◽  
Elastic Force ◽  
Pseudorandom Sequence ◽  
Sample Population ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Flexion Extension

To elucidate how primary motor cortex (M1) neurons contribute to the performance of a broad range of different and even incompatible motor skills, we trained two monkeys to perform single-degree-of-freedom elbow flexion/extension movements that could be perturbed by a variety of externally generated force fields. Fields were presented in a pseudorandom sequence of trial blocks. Different computer monitor background colors signaled the nature of the force field throughout each block. There were five different force fields: null field without perturbing torque, assistive and resistive viscous fields proportional to velocity, a resistive elastic force field proportional to position and a resistive viscoelastic field that was the linear combination of the resistive viscous and elastic force fields. After the monkeys were extensively trained in the five field conditions, neural recordings were subsequently made in M1 contralateral to the trained arm. Many caudal M1 neurons altered their activity systematically across most or all of the force fields in a manner that was appropriate to contribute to the compensation for each of the fields. The net activity of the entire sample population likewise provided a predictive signal about the differences in the time course of the external forces encountered during the movements across all force conditions. The neurons showed a broad range of sensitivities to the different fields, and there was little evidence of a modular structure by which subsets of M1 neurons were preferentially activated during movements in specific fields or combinations of fields.

Colored context cues can facilitate the ability to learn and to switch between multiple dynamical force fields

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Touria Addou ◽  
Nedialko Krouchev ◽  
John F. Kalaska
Keyword(s):  
Force Field ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Force Fields ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Motor Output ◽  
Viscous Force ◽  
Dynamic Force ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Context Cues

We tested the efficacy of color context cues during adaptation to dynamic force fields. Four groups of human subjects performed elbow flexion/extension movements to move a cursor between targets on a monitor while encountering a resistive (Vr) or assistive (Va) viscous force field. They performed two training sets of 256 trials daily, for 10 days. The monitor background color changed (red, green) every four successful trials but provided different degrees of force field context information to each group. For the irrelevant-cue groups, the color changed every four trials, but one group encountered only the Va field and the other only the Vr field. For the reliable-cue group, the force field alternated between Va and Vr each time the monitor changed color (Vr, red; Va, green). For the unreliable-cue group, the force field changed between Va and Vr pseudorandomly at each color change. All subjects made increasingly stereotyped movements over 10 training days. Reliable-cue subjects typically learned the association between color cues and fields and began to make predictive changes in motor output at each color change during the first day. Their performance continued to improve over the remaining days. Unreliable-cue subjects also improved their performance across training days but developed a strategy of probing the nature of the field at each color change by emitting a default motor response and then adjusting their motor output in subsequent trials. These findings show that subjects can extract explicit and implicit information from color context cues during force field adaptation.

Time Course of Determination of Movement Direction in the Reaction Time Task in Humans

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 1195-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Sommer ◽  
Joseph Classen ◽  
Leonardo G. Cohen ◽  
Mark Hallett
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Movement Direction ◽  
Movement Onset ◽  
Thumb Movement

The primary motor cortex produces motor commands that include encoding the direction of movement. Excitability of the motor cortex in the reaction time (RT) task can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). To elucidate the timing of the increase in cortical excitability and of the determination of movement direction before movement onset, we asked six right-handed, healthy subjects to either abduct or extend their right thumb after a go-signal indicated the appropriate direction. Between the go-signal and movement onset, single TMS pulses were delivered to the contralateral motor cortex. We recorded the direction of the TMS-induced thumb movement and the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) from the abductor pollicis brevis and extensor pollicis brevis muscles. Facilitation of MEPs from the prime mover, as early as 200 ms before the end of the reaction time, preceded facilitation of MEPs from the nonprime mover, and both preceded measurable directional change. Compared with a control condition in which no voluntary movement was required, the direction of the TMS-induced thumb movement started to change in the direction of the intended movement as early as 90 ms before the end of the RT, and maximum changes were seen shortly before the end of reaction time. Movement acceleration also increased with maxima shortly before the end of the RT. We conclude that in concentric movements a change of the movement direction encoded in the primary motor cortex occurs in the 200 ms prior to movement onset, which is as early as increased excitability itself can be detected.

scholarly journals Relationship between Finger Movement Rate and Functional Magnetic Resonance Signal Change in Human Primary Motor Cortex

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 1250-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Rao ◽  
P. A. Bandettini ◽  
J. R. Binder ◽  
J. A. Bobholz ◽  
T. A. Hammeke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Stimulus Presentation ◽  
Functional Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Movement Rate ◽  
Noninvasive Technique ◽  
Movement Rates ◽  
Signal Change ◽  
Flexion Extension

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) is a noninvasive technique for mapping regional brain changes in response to sensory, motor, or cognitive activation tasks. Interpretation of these activation experiments may be confounded by more elementary task parameters, such as stimulus presentation or movement rates. We examined the effect of movement rate on the FMRI response recorded from the contralateral primary motor cortex. Four right-handed healthy subjects performed flexion-extension movements of digits 2–5 of the right hand at rates of 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 Hz. Results of this study indicated a positive linear relationship between movement rate and FMRI signal change. Additionally, the number of voxels demonstrating functional activity increased significantly with faster movement rates. The magnitude of the signal change at each movement rate remained constant over the course of three 8-min scanning series. These findings are similar to those of previous rate studies of the visual and auditory system performed with positron emission tomography (PET) and FMRI.

scholarly journals The Excitability of Ipsilateral Motor Evoked Potentials Is Not Task-specific and Spatially Distinct From the Contralateral Motor Hotspot

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelly Seusing ◽  
Sebastian Strauss ◽  
Robert Fleischmann ◽  
Christina Nafz ◽  
Sergiu Groppa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Motor Pathways ◽  
Task Dependence ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Voluntary Contractions

Abstract ObjectiveThe role of ipsilateral descending motor pathways in voluntary movement of humans is still a matter of debate. Few studies have examined the task dependent modulation of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials (iMEPs). Here, we determined the location of upper limb biceps brachii (BB) representation within the ipsilateral primary motor cortex. MethodsMR-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping of the dominant hemisphere was undertaken with twenty healthy participants who made tonic unilateral, bilateral homologous or bilateral antagonistic elbow flexion-extension voluntary contractions. Map center of gravity (CoG) and area for each BB were obtained. ResultsThe map CoG of the ipsilateral BB was located more anterior-laterally than those of the contralateral BB within the primary motor cortex. However different tasks had no effect on either the iMEP CoG location or the size. ConclusionOur data suggests that ipsilateral and contralateral MEP might originate in distinct adjacent neural populations in the primary motor cortex, independent of task dependence.

scholarly journals Cyclic, condition-independent activity in primary motor cortex predicts corrective movement behavior

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam G. Rouse ◽  
Marc H. Schieber ◽  
Sridevi V. Sarma
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Neural Activity ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Reaching Movements ◽  
Movement Behavior ◽  
Cyclic Activity ◽  
Cyclic Condition ◽  
Neuron Populations ◽  
Optimizing Control

AbstractReaching movements have previously been observed to have large condition-independent neural activity and cyclic neural dynamics. A new precision center-out task was used to test whether cyclic neural activity in the primary motor cortex (M1) occurred not only during initial reaching movements but also during subsequent corrective movements. Corrective movements were observed to be discrete with a time course and bell-shaped speed profile similar to the initial movements. Cyclic trajectories identified in the condition-independent neural activity were similar for initial and corrective submovements. The phase of the cyclic condition-independent neural activity predicted when peak movement speeds occurred, even when the subject made multiple corrective movements. Rather than being controlled as continuations of the initial reach, a discrete cycle of motor cortex activity encodes each corrective submovement.Significance StatementDuring a precision center-out task, initial and subsequent corrective movements occur as discrete submovements with bell-shaped speed profiles. A cycle of condition-independent activity in primary motor cortex neuron populations corresponds to each submovement whether initial or corrective, such that the phase of this cyclic activity predicts the time of peak speed. These submovements accompanied by cyclic neural activity offer important clues into how the we successfully execute precise, corrective reaching movements and may have implications for optimizing control of brain-computer interfaces.

scholarly journals Modulation of transcallosal inhibition by bilateral activation of agonist and antagonist proximal arm muscles

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 405-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica A. Perez ◽  
Jane E. Butler ◽  
Janet L. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Primary Motor Cortex ◽  
Motor Behavior ◽  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Silent Period ◽  
Elbow Flexion ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Triceps Brachii ◽  
Transcallosal Inhibition ◽  
Flexion Extension

Transcallosal inhibitory interactions between proximal representations in the primary motor cortex remain poorly understood. In this study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine the ipsilateral silent period (iSP; a measure of transcallosal inhibition) in the biceps and triceps brachii during unilateral and bilateral isometric voluntary contractions. Healthy volunteers performed 10% of maximal isometric voluntary elbow flexion or extension with one arm while the contralateral arm remained at rest or performed 30% of maximal isometric voluntary elbow flexion or extension. The iSP was measured in the arm performing 10% contractions, and electromyographic (EMG) recordings were comparable across conditions. The iSP onset and duration in the biceps and triceps brachii were comparable. In both muscles, the iSP depth and area were increased during bilateral contractions of homologous agonist muscles (extension-extension and flexion-flexion) compared with a unilateral contraction, whereas during bilateral contractions of nonhomologous antagonist muscles (extension-flexion and flexion-extension), the iSP depth and area were decreased compared with a unilateral contraction, and sometimes facilitation of EMG was seen. This effect was never observed during bilateral activation of homologous muscles. The size of responses evoked by cervicomedullary electrical stimulation in the arm that made 10% contractions remained unchanged across conditions. Thus transcallosal inhibition targeting triceps and biceps brachii is upregulated by voluntary contraction of the contralateral agonist muscle and downregulated by voluntary contraction of the contralateral antagonist muscle. We speculate that these reciprocal task-dependent interactions between bilateral flexor and extensor arm regions of the motor cortex may contribute to coupling between the arms during motor behavior.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document