Comparison of turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) with T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and T1-weighted spin-echo MR imaging in the early diagnosis of acute osteomyelitis in children

1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 846-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. Hauer ◽  
Markus Uhl ◽  
Karl-Heinz Allmann ◽  
Jörg Laubenberger ◽  
Lothar B. Zimmerhackl ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-G. Lee ◽  
Y. K. Jeong ◽  
J. C. Kim ◽  
E. M. Kang ◽  
P. N. Kim ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Zhalniarovich ◽  
Z. Adamiak ◽  
A. Pomianowski ◽  
M. Jaskólska

Abstract Magnetic resonance imaging is the best imaging modality for the brain and spine. Quality of the received images depends on many technical factors. The most significant factors are: positioning the patient, proper coil selection, selection of appropriate sequences and image planes. The present contrast between different tissues provides an opportunity to diagnose various lesions. In many clinics magnetic resonance imaging has replaced myelography because of its noninvasive modality and because it provides excellent anatomic detail. There are many different combinations of sequences possible for spinal and brain MR imaging. Most frequently used are: T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE), T1- and T2-weighted turbo spin echo, Fluid Attenuation Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), T1-weighted gradient echo (GE) and spin echo (SE), high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) sequences, fat-suppressing short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE). Magnetic resonance imaging reveals neurologic lesions which were previously hard to diagnose antemortem.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Morita ◽  
Takeshi Nakaura ◽  
Natsuki Maruyama ◽  
Yuji Iyama ◽  
Seitaro Oda ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuna Zhao ◽  
Zhibo Wen ◽  
Ge Zhang ◽  
Fanheng Huang ◽  
Shilong Lu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document