Polymorphism and signatures of selection in the multimammate rat DQB gene

2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joëlle Goüy de Bellocq ◽  
Herwig Leirs
2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wim Gorssen ◽  
Roel Meyermans ◽  
Steven Janssens ◽  
Nadine Buys

Abstract Background Runs of homozygosity (ROH) have become the state-of-the-art method for analysis of inbreeding in animal populations. Moreover, ROH are suited to detect signatures of selection via ROH islands and are used in other applications, such as genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Currently, a vast amount of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data is available online, but most of these data have never been used for ROH analysis. Therefore, we performed a ROH analysis on large medium-density SNP datasets in eight animal species (cat, cattle, dog, goat, horse, pig, sheep and water buffalo; 442 different populations) and make these results publicly available. Results The results include an overview of ROH islands per population and a comparison of the incidence of these ROH islands among populations from the same species, which can assist researchers when studying other (livestock) populations or when looking for similar signatures of selection. We were able to confirm many known ROH islands, for example signatures of selection for the myostatin (MSTN) gene in sheep and horses. However, our results also included multiple other ROH islands, which are common to many populations and not identified to date (e.g. on chromosomes D4 and E2 in cats and on chromosome 6 in sheep). Conclusions We are confident that our repository of ROH islands is a valuable reference for future studies. The discovered ROH island regions represent a unique starting point for new studies or can be used as a reference for future studies. Furthermore, we encourage authors to add their population-specific ROH findings to our repository.


2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (10) ◽  
pp. 4660-4669 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Moioli ◽  
F. Pilla ◽  
E. Ciani

Evolution ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Feiner ◽  
Alfredo Rago ◽  
Geoffrey M. While ◽  
Tobias Uller

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e0171088 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Msalya ◽  
Eui-Soo Kim ◽  
Emmanuel L. K. Laisser ◽  
Maulilio J. Kipanyula ◽  
Esron D. Karimuribo ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1502-1506 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Vollbrecht ◽  
B. Sigmon

Crop plants were domesticated by prehistoric farmers through artificial selection to provide a means of feeding the human population. This article discusses the developmental genetics of crop domestication and improvement, including the historical framework and recent approaches in maize and other grasses. In many cases, selecting for a plant form that correlates with productivity involves controlling meristem activity. In the domestication of modern maize from its progenitor Zea mays ssp. parviglumis, QTL (quantitative trait loci) mapping, genetics and population genomics approaches have identified several genes that contain signatures of selection. Only a few genes involved in the derivation of the highly productive maize ear have been identified, including teosinte glume architecture1 and ramosa1. Future prospects hinge on forward and reverse genetics, as well as on other approaches from the developing discipline of evo-devo (evolutionary developmental biology).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document