Cell-penetrating peptide and antibiotic combination therapy: a potential alternative to combat drug resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (9) ◽  
pp. 4073-4083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harmandeep Kaur Randhawa ◽  
Ankur Gautam ◽  
Minakshi Sharma ◽  
Rakesh Bhatia ◽  
Grish C. Varshney ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 1414-1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Szymanek-Majchrzak ◽  
A. Mlynarczyk ◽  
K. Dobrzaniecka ◽  
K. Majchrzak ◽  
E. Mierzwinska-Nastalska ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
pp. 114-118
Author(s):  
Raghavendra Rao M. V ◽  
Mubasheer Ali ◽  
Yogendra Kumar Verma ◽  
Dilip Mathai ◽  
Tina Priscilla ◽  
...  

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is difcult to treat with methicillin, amoxicillin, penicillin, oxacillin, and other commonly used antibiotics because of its resistance. Staphylococcus organisms rapidly develop drug resistance as many as 50% of the domiciliary and 80% of the hospital strains are now penicillin resistant. Staphylococcus aureus also show multiple drug resistance. Therefore, Staphylococcal isolates should always be tested for antimicrobial sensitivity and chronic infection should be treated by more than one drug. Before 1960,when methicillin, is the rst penicillin's-resistant penicillin's, was brought into use, about 1%of the strains of the Staphylococcus aureus were "methicillin resistant" and by 1970 in Britain their proportion has risen to about 5%.These strains are tolerant of, low therapeutic concentrations of methicillin, cloxacillin, benzyl penicillin and ampicillin.They do not destroy methicillin and cloxacillin, but most of them are penicillinase-producing as well as being "methicillin resistant" and therefore inactivate benzyl penicillin and ampicillin. Its resistance is uncertain since infections may be cured with a high dose of methicillin.



2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Allan ◽  
Maria del Carmen Parquet ◽  
Kimberley A. Savage ◽  
Bruce E. Holbein

ABSTRACT Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) opportunistic infections are a major health burden. Decolonization of hospitalized patients with mupirocin (MUP) has reduced the incidence of infection but has led to MUP resistance. DIBI is a developmental-stage anti-infective agent that sequesters bacterial iron and bolsters innate host iron-withdrawal defenses. Clinical isolates possessing low, high, or no MUP resistance all had similarly high susceptibilities to DIBI. Intranasal DIBI reduced nares bacterial burdens in mice to the same extent as MUP. No resistance was found after exposure to DIBI.



2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 204993611988650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Patrik Hornak ◽  
Seher Anjum ◽  
David Reynoso

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B) may fail to improve with standard monotherapy, particularly in patients with multifocal infection, incomplete source control, or persistent bacteremia. Synergy observed in vitro between ceftaroline (CPT) and daptomycin (DAP) or vancomycin (VAN) may translate into clinical benefit. Here, we describe our experience with DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT for complicated MRSA-B after monotherapy failure. Methods: Single-center, retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with DAP/CPT or VAN/CPT for MRSA-B after monotherapy failure from 1 January 2016 to 30 November 2018. Results: We identified 11 instances of combination therapy in 10 patients (DAP/CPT = 6, VAN/CPT = 5) with 1 patient receiving VAN/CPT followed by DAP/CPT. Rates of multifocal infection, incomplete source control, persistent bacteremia, and infective endocarditis were high (100%, 80%, 60%, and 60%, respectively). Combination therapy was initiated most commonly for persistent bacteremia (60%). When patients were persistently bacteremic, median preceding duration was 13 days and median time to clearance was 3 days. Total microbiologic cure rate was 100%. There were zero instances of bacteremia relapse at 30 days (30D) or 60 days (60D). All-cause 30D and 60D mortality rates were 11.1% and 33.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Combination therapy demonstrated success in diverse cases of refractory MRSA-B, including instances of persistent bacteremia paired with incomplete source control. Optimal timing and therapeutic cadence for combination therapy remain unclear. Our findings suggest that DAP/CPT and VAN/CPT can be considered for complicated MRSA bacteremia when other treatment options fail or are unavailable. We propose persistent bacteremia with incomplete source control to be a clinical niche particularly worthy of further investigation.



2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Evans R. Henson ◽  
Juwon Yim ◽  
Jordan R. Smith ◽  
George Sakoulas ◽  
Michael J. Rybak

ABSTRACT The evidence for using combination therapy for the treatment of serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is growing. In this study, we investigated the synergistic effect of daptomycin (DAP) combined with piperacillin-tazobactam and ampicillin-sulbactam against MRSA in time-kill experiments. Six of eight strains demonstrated synergy between DAP and the β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combination. In 5/8 strains, the synergy occurred only in the presence of the BLI, highlighting a role for BLIs in peptide–β-lactam synergy.





Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document