scholarly journals FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 328-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Boellaard ◽  
Roberto Delgado-Bolton ◽  
Wim J. G. Oyen ◽  
Francesco Giammarile ◽  
Klaus Tatsch ◽  
...  

Abstract The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of FDG PET/CT for oncological imaging of adult patients. PET is a quantitative imaging technique and therefore requires a common quality control (QC)/quality assurance (QA) procedure to maintain the accuracy and precision of quantitation. Repeatability and reproducibility are two essential requirements for any quantitative measurement and/or imaging biomarker. Repeatability relates to the uncertainty in obtaining the same result in the same patient when he or she is examined more than once on the same system. However, imaging biomarkers should also have adequate reproducibility, i.e. the ability to yield the same result in the same patient when that patient is examined on different systems and at different imaging sites. Adequate repeatability and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of FDG PET/CT within multicentre trials. A common standardised imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate use of FDG PET/CT imaging and increase the value of publications and, therefore, their contribution to evidence-based medicine. Moreover, consistency in numerical values between platforms and institutes that acquire the data will potentially enhance the role of semiquantitative and quantitative image interpretation. Precision and accuracy are additionally important as FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate tumour response as well as for diagnosis, prognosis and staging. Therefore both the previous and these new guidelines specifically aim to achieve standardised uptake value harmonisation in multicentre settings.

Author(s):  
Nežka Hribernik ◽  
Daniel T Huff ◽  
Andrej Studen ◽  
Katarina Zevnik ◽  
Žan Klaneček ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To develop quantitative molecular imaging biomarkers of immune-related adverse event (irAE) development in malignant melanoma (MM) patients receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) imaged with 18F-FDG PET/CT. Methods 18F-FDG PET/CT images of 58 MM patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 ICI were retrospectively analyzed for indication of irAE. Three target organs, most commonly affected by irAE, were considered: bowel, lung, and thyroid. Patient charts were reviewed to identify which patients experienced irAE, irAE grade, and time to irAE diagnosis. Target organs were segmented using a convolutional neural network (CNN), and novel quantitative imaging biomarkers — SUV percentiles (SUVX%) of 18F-FDG uptake within the target organs — were correlated with the clinical irAE status. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to quantify irAE detection performance. Patients who did not experience irAE were used to establish normal ranges for target organ 18F-FDG uptake. Results A total of 31% (18/58) patients experienced irAE in the three target organs: bowel (n=6), lung (n=5), and thyroid (n=9). Optimal percentiles for identifying irAE were bowel (SUV95%, AUROC=0.79), lung (SUV95%, AUROC=0.98), and thyroid (SUV75%, AUROC=0.88). Optimal cut-offs for irAE detection were bowel (SUV95%>2.7 g/mL), lung (SUV95%>1.7 g/mL), and thyroid (SUV75%>2.1 g/mL). Normal ranges (95% confidence interval) for the SUV percentiles in patients without irAE were bowel [1.74, 2.86 g/mL], lung [0.73, 1.46 g/mL], and thyroid [0.86, 1.99 g/mL]. Conclusions Increased 18F-FDG uptake within irAE-affected organs provides predictive information about the development of irAE in MM patients receiving ICI and represents a potential quantitative imaging biomarker for irAE. Some irAE can be detected on 18F-FDG PET/CT well before clinical symptoms appear.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 26-26
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Alberge ◽  
Bastien Jamet ◽  
Clement Bailly ◽  
Cyrille Touzeau ◽  
Jonathan Cruard ◽  
...  

Background Positron emission tomography (PET) using 18Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) provides independent prognostic informations in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients (Moreau et al, ASH 2019; Moreau et al, JCO 2017; Zamagni et al, Blood 2011). At baseline, FDG-PET/CT characteristics such as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), presence of extramedullary disease (EMD), and paramedullary disease (PMD) define high-risk NDMM patients. Similarly, the presence of negative FDG-PET/CT at baseline has been associated with favorable outcome in NDMM patients (Abe et al, EJNMMI 2019; Moreau et al, ASH 2019). The aim of the present study was to identify MM molecular features associated with these functional imaging biomarkers. Methods A group of 136 patients from CASSIOPET, a companion study of the CASSIOPEIA cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02541383) were subjected to whole genome expression profiling using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) on sorted bone marrow plasma cells in addition to FDG-PET/CT imaging at baseline. RNA-seq reads were aligned to hg38 reference genome with STAR and subjected to differential expression testing with DESeq2 with sample purity treated as a model covariate. High risk group with the GEP70 signature and classification from the seven molecular subgroups (CD-1, CD-2, HY, LB, MF, MS, and PR) were determined by weighted mean value of gene expression (Zhan et al, Blood 2006). Special attention was paid to genes associated with glucose metabolism and related to plasma cells proliferation. On FDG-PET/CT, SUVmax of areas of focally increased tracer uptake on bone was determined and the presence of EMD or PMD identified. Results FDG-PET/CT was positive in 108 patients out of 136 (79,4%), with 19 (14%) and 15 (11%) of them presenting PMD and EMD disease respectively. Expression level of glucose transporter GLUT1 was independent of these three imaging biomarkers (FDG-PET/CT positivity, EMD and PMD), while HK2 was downregulated in negative scans only (Fold Change = 2.1, padj=0.02). GLUT5 expression was associated with positive FDG-PET/CT (Fold Change = 3.5, padj = 8E-4). Both GLUT1 and HK2 weakly correlated with SUVmax (r=0.26 and 0.36, respectively). Of note, negative FDG-PET/CT were enriched for the LB group of patients, consistent with the lower incidence of MRI-defined bone lesions reported in this subgroup, and it remained independent of the GEP70 signature. Furthermore, high risk GEP70 signature was associated with a SUVmax ≥ 4, and correlated with the presence of PMD (OR=3.2, CI=[0.95-10.6], p=0.03), but not with EMD (p=0.7).Conversely, there was no patient from the LB group with detected PMD on imaging, but 25% (2/8) showed EMD, suggesting that different biological features support both disease patterns. Finally, positive PET/CT profiles seemed to display two distinct signatures with either high expression of proliferation genes (MKI67, PCNA, TOP2A, STMN1), or high expression of GLUT5 and lymphocyte antigens (CD19, CD30L, and CCR2), suggesting a different phenotype for this subgroup. This finding was independent of a high SUVmax. Conclusion Our study confirmed that negative FDG-PET/CT at baseline is associated with low HK2 expression while positive exams showed increased GLUT5 expression and proliferation markers. We describe a strong correlation between two imaging biomarkers (baseline SUVmax and PMD) and high risk signature and molecular subgroup with highly proliferative disease. On the contrary, EMD appeared independent of high risk signature or molecular subgroups. Additional studies will confirm and extend the correlation between imaging and clinical features of the disease and molecular characteristics of malignant plasma cells. Disclosures Touzeau: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Moreau:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria.


2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatoyo Nakajo ◽  
Megumi Jinguji ◽  
Yoshiaki Nakabeppu ◽  
Masayuki Nakajo ◽  
Ryutarou Higashi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Hirata ◽  
Osamu Manabe ◽  
Keiichi Magota ◽  
Sho Furuya ◽  
Tohru Shiga ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Radiology reports contribute not only to the particular patient, but also to constructing massive training dataset in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is often described in daily radiology reports of FDG PET-CT. If SUVmax can be used as an identifier of lesion, that would greatly help AI interpret radiology reports. We aimed to clarify whether the lesion can be localized using SUVmax written in radiology reports.Methods The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. We investigated a total of 112 lesions from 30 FDG PET-CT images acquired with 3 different scanners. SUVmax was calculated from DICOM files based on the latest Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) publication. The voxels showing the given SUVmax were exhaustively searched in the whole-body images and counted. SUVmax was provided with 5 different degrees of precision: integer (e.g., 3), 1st decimal places (DP) (3.1), 2nd DP (3.14), 3rd DP (3.142), and 4th DP (3.1416). For instance, when SUVmax=3.14 was given, the voxels with 3.135≤SUVmax<3.145 were extracted. We also evaluated whether local maximum restriction could improve the identifying performance, where only the voxels showing the highest intensity within some neighborhood were considered. We defined that “identical detection” was achieved when only single voxel satisfied the criterion.Results A total of 112 lesions from 30 FDG PET-CT images were investigated. SUVmax ranged from 1.3 to 49.1 (median = 5.6, IQR = 5.2). Generally, when larger and more precise SUVmax values were given, fewer voxels satisfied the criterion. The local maximum restriction was very effective. When SUVmax was determined to 4 decimal places (e.g., 3.1416) and the local maximum restriction was applied, identical detection was achieved in 33.3% (lesions with SUVmax<2), 79.5% (2≤SUVmax<5), and 97.8% (5≤SUVmax) of lesions.Conclusions SUVmax of FDG PET-CT can be used as an identifier to localize the lesion if precise SUVmax is provided and local maximum restriction was applied, although the lesions showing SUVmax<2 were difficult to identify. The proposed method may have potential to make use of radiology reports retrospectively for constructing training datasets for AI.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (7) ◽  
pp. 398-403
Author(s):  
Atsutaka Okizaki ◽  
Michihiro Nakayama ◽  
Shunta Ishitoya ◽  
Kaori Nakajima ◽  
Masaaki Yamashina ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 138-139
Author(s):  
Maria Valkema ◽  
B Noordman ◽  
Bas P L Wijnhoven ◽  
M C W Spaander ◽  
Sjoerd M Lagarde ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) induces a pathologically complete response in approximately 30% of patients with oesophageal cancer. To explore the possibility of safe postponement of surgery, accurate clinical response evaluations are needed to exclude residual disease. The present study aims to assess the value of F-18-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of residual tumour (> 10% tumour cells = TRG3–4 vs. no vital cells = TRG1) or metastases after nCRT. Methods FDG-PET/CT at baseline and 12 weeks after nCRT was performed according to the European Association of Nuclear Medicine guidelines 1.0 (2.3MBq/kg F-18-FDG; scanning 60 ± 5min.) and the protocol of the preSANO study. Qualitative analysis included sensitive reading of presence of residual tumour and/or metastases. A lesion was considered FDG-positive, when any uptake in the lesion itself was above the adjacent oesophageal background uptake. Quantitatively, SUV/lean body mass (SUL) measurements at tumour, lymph nodes, oesophagus, liver and bloodpool were recorded and compared with pathology (resection specimen: gold standard). Results Some 129 of 207 patients with FDG-avid tumours at baseline proceeded to FDG-PET/CT at around 12 weeks after nCRT just before surgery. Forty-one of 129 patients had TRG3–4, of whom 6 were missed on FDG-PET/CT (15% false negative) with SULmax 2.07 ± 0.25, SUL-ratio tumour/oesophagus (SULR) 1.35 ± 0.14. Sensitivity for TRG2–3-4 vs. TRG1 was 57/71 (80%). SULmax and SULR of FDG-positives were 3.76 ± 1.33 and 1.82 ± 0.69 respectively, compared to SULmax 2.21 ± 0.42 and SULR 1.31 ± 0.22 in FDG-negatives. Distant metastases were detected in 18 of 190 (10%) patients. Of all patients with postponed surgery, 12 had ≥ 1 additional FDG-PET/CT during follow-up (25–49.7 weeks after nCRT). Eventually, 4 patients underwent surgery. Three of 4 had increased FDG-signal and TRG3–4; 1 patient had decreased FDG-signal and no tumour left (TRG1). Conclusion FDG-PET/CT at around 12 weeks after nCRT misses TRG3–4 tumours in 15% and detects residual TRG2–3-4 in 80%. Furthermore, PET-CT detects distant metastases in 10% of patients after nCRT. These data indicate that serial FDG-PET may become valuable in an active surveillance approach. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Hirata ◽  
Osamu Manabe ◽  
Keiichi Magota ◽  
Sho Furuya ◽  
Tohru Shiga ◽  
...  

Background: Diagnostic reports contribute not only to the particular patient, but also to constructing massive training dataset in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is often described in daily diagnostic reports of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) – computed tomography (CT). If SUVmax can be used as an identifier of lesion, that would greatly help AI interpret diagnostic reports. We aimed to clarify whether the lesion can be localized using SUVmax strings.Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. We investigated a total of 112 lesions from 30 FDG PET-CT images acquired with 3 different scanners. SUVmax was calculated from DICOM files based on the latest Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) publication. The voxels showing the given SUVmax were exhaustively searched in the whole-body images and counted. SUVmax was provided with 5 different degrees of precision: integer (e.g., 3), 1st decimal places (DP) (3.1), 2nd DP (3.14), 3rd DP (3.142), and 4th DP (3.1416). For instance, when SUVmax = 3.14 was given, the voxels with 3.135 ≤ SUVmax &lt; 3.145 were extracted. We also evaluated whether local maximum restriction could improve the identifying performance, where only the voxels showing the highest intensity within some neighborhood were considered. We defined that “identical detection” was achieved when only single voxel satisfied the criterion.Results: A total of 112 lesions from 30 FDG PET-CT images were investigated. SUVmax ranged from 1.3 to 49.1 (median = 5.6). Generally, when larger and more precise SUVmax values were given, fewer voxels satisfied the criterion. The local maximum restriction was very effective. When SUVmax was determined to 4 decimal places (e.g., 3.1416) and the local maximum restriction was applied, identical detection was achieved in 33.3% (lesions with SUVmax &lt; 2), 79.5% (2 ≤ SUVmax &lt; 5), and 97.8% (5 ≤ SUVmax) of lesions.Conclusion: In this preliminary study, SUVmax of FDG PET-CT could be used as an identifier to localize the lesion if precise SUVmax is provided and local maximum restriction was applied, although the lesions showing SUVmax &lt; 2 were difficult to identify. The proposed method may have potential to make use of diagnostic reports retrospectively for constructing training datasets for AI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document