Soil solution and exchange complex response to repeated wetting–drying with modestly saline–sodic water

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W. Bauder ◽  
Kimberly R. Hershberger ◽  
Linzy S. Browning
Soil Research ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 549 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Dang ◽  
J. Bennett ◽  
A. Marchuk ◽  
A. Biggs ◽  
S. Raine

Use of non-traditional and marginal quality saline sodic water will increase in water limited environments and methods to assess use suitability are required. The threshold electrolyte concentration (CTH) defines the soil solution concentration, for a given soil solution sodicity, at which an acceptable reduction in the soil hydraulic conductivity (10–25%) is maintained without further soil structural degradation. The traditional method of determining CTH is via leaching columns, which are laborious and often expensive. Dispersive potential (PDIS) is potentially a more rapid method with which to determine the CTH in a practical sense and make management recommendations for water quality use on a given soil. This work evaluated the PDIS method against known CTH data to determine the efficacy of use for non-dispersive soils irrigated with marginal quality saline sodic water. Results suggest that the PDIS approach to CTH did not reliably, or efficiently, determine the CTH in non-dispersive soils equilibrated with an irrigation solution. Using it to determine the aggregation and dispersion boundary for initially non-dispersive soil appeared to have merit, but only where the aggregates equilibrated with the irrigation solution were subject to rapid dilution with deionised water.


Author(s):  
M.C.H.Mouat Pieter Nes

Reduction in water content of a soil increased the concentration of ammonium and nitrate in solution, but had no effect on the concentration of phosphate. The corresponding reduction in the quantity of phosphate in solution caused an equivalent reduction in the response of ryegrass to applied phosphate. Keywords: soil solution, soil water content, phosphate, ryegrass, nutrition.


HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 498d-498
Author(s):  
Z.L. He ◽  
A.K. Alva ◽  
D.V. Calvert ◽  
D.J. Banks ◽  
Y.C. Li

A field experiment was conducted in a Riviera fine sand (Alfisol) with 25-year-old `White Marsh' grapefruit trees on Sour orange rootstock to monitor the downward transport of nutrients from fertilization practices. Fertilizer was applied as either dry granular broadcast (three applications/year) or fertigation (15 applications/year) at N rates of 56, 112, 168, and 336 kg/ha per year using a N:P:K blend (1.0:0.17:1.0). Soil solution was sampled bi-weekly from suction lysimeters, installed under the tree canopy, about 120 cm from the tree trunk, at two depths representing above (120 cm) and below (180 cm) the hard pan. The concentrations of K, Ca, and Mg were greater at the 180- than at 120-cm depth, whereas, the converse was true with respect to the concentration of P in soil solution. Over a 2-year period, the mean concentrations of P and K varied from 0.031-0.976 and 150-250 mg·L–1, respectively. Increased rate of fertilization also appeared to increase the concentrations of Ca and Mg in the soil solution. This could be due to effects of slight acidification of the soil with increased rates of ammonium form of N. A parallel study on pH measurements has shown evidence of soil acidification, under the tree canopy, with increased rates of ammonium fertilization. In a bedded grove, the soil solution above the hard pan is likely to seep into the water furrow, which is discharged into the drainage water.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document