Identification of green pigments from fragments of Roman mural paintings of three Roman sites from north of Germania Superior

2016 ◽  
Vol 122 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafaela Debastiani ◽  
Rolf Simon ◽  
Joerg Goettlicher ◽  
Stefan Heissler ◽  
Ralph Steininger ◽  
...  
inArt 2016 ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 247-258
Author(s):  
Rafaela Debastiani ◽  
Rolf Simon ◽  
Joerg Goettlicher ◽  
Stefan Heissler ◽  
Ralph Steininger ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 116-117 ◽  
pp. 211-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Luis Perez-Rodriguez ◽  
Maria del Carmen Jimenez de Haro ◽  
Belinda Siguenza ◽  
José María Martinez-Blanes

1973 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Lust

Pigment content of ashes grown up under different circumstances - The pigment content (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b,  xanthophyll and carotene) has been researched with ashes grown up under  different light circumstances and varying in age and height.     The results prove that the general laws concerning the influence of light  on the pigment content, don’t always work.     The phenomen is very complex. The light quantity is very important in some  cases, but insignificant in others. It seems origin and height of plants have  a strong influence. The results prove also the influence of the environment  is much higher on small plants as on big ones.     The research indicates finally the correlation between the green pigments,  the yellow pigments, and between the green pigments on the one side and the  yellow ones on the other side.


1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 437-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. V. Marchenko ◽  
S. A. Egorova ◽  
N. O. Blinov ◽  
N. A. Krassilnikov
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianghao Du ◽  
Zhanyun Zhu ◽  
Junchang Yang ◽  
Jia Wang ◽  
Xiaotong Jiang

AbstractIn this paper, a comparative study was conducted on the extraction effects of six agents for collagen-based mural painting binders. These agents were used to extract the residual proteins in the non-aged and thermal aged samples. The protein extraction efficiencies of different extracting agents were quantitatively determined by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method, and then processed by multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The impact of the extraction process on the protein structure was characterized by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), ultraviolet absorption spectrum (UV) and circular dichroism (CD). The results showed that, for both non-aged and aged samples, the extraction efficiency of 2 M guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) was significantly higher than the other five agents, with less damage to the protein structure during the extraction process.


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
José Luis Ruvalcaba-Sil ◽  
Luis Barba ◽  
Edgar Casanova-González ◽  
Alejandro Mitrani ◽  
Margarita Muñoz ◽  
...  

Techinantitla building complex, in the Amanalco neighborhood of the ancient city of Teotihuacan, is famous for the iconography and quality of the mural paintings found in this site. A significant part of this heritage has been lost due to looting. In recent years, an interdisciplinary research project was developed to study the limited patrimony that was left. As part of this study, we first employed geophysical techniques to reconstruct the architectural pattern of the compound’s remaining walls, where other paintings may still be found. Then, we applied a non-invasive methodology to characterize a large set of fragments recovered in the 1980s and to gain information on their pigments and manufacturing techniques. This methodology included False Color Infrared Imaging, X-ray Fluorescence and Fiber-Optics Reflectance Spectroscopy, and led to the identification of hematite, calcite, malachite, azurite and an unidentified blue pigment. The results were compared with a previous study performed on a set of Techinantitla mural paintings looted in the 1960s. A broader comparison with contemporary mural paintings from other Teotihuacan complexes shows good agreement in the materials used. These results may suggest a standardization in the making of Teotihuacan mural painting during the Xolapan period (350 to 550 AD).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document