Efficacy and safety of colonic stenting for malignant disease in the elderly

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 747-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fergal Donnellan ◽  
Garret Cullen ◽  
Daniel Cagney ◽  
Phil O’Halloran ◽  
Gavin C. Harewood ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110356
Author(s):  
Manpreet Singh ◽  
Aditi Mehta Grewal ◽  
Himanshi Singh ◽  
Manjula Sharma ◽  
Manpreet Kaur ◽  
...  

Purpose: To study the long-term efficacy and safety of local application of imiquimod 5% and fluorouracil 1% creams in complex eyelid basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). Methods: A retrospective, non-comparative study in biopsy-proven, complex (involving canthi or >50% of eyelid length) eyelid BCC patients who were medically unfit for surgical procedures. All patients were medically treated with either of the creams using fixed-dose regimens for a minimum of 3 months. All received oral vitamin C 500 mg QID for 3 months as an adjunct for collagen healing. A minimum of “post-treatment” follow-up of 12 months was observed. Results: Of total 30 patients, imiquimod 5% and fluorouracil 1% were used in 16 and 14 patients, respectively. The mean age of our patients was 70.5 years. The co-morbidities included – severe coronary artery disease using blood-thinners ( n = 19), poorly controlled diabetes ( n = 12), poorly controlled hypertension ( n = 6), on nebulization ( n = 3), and tuberculosis with pulmonary fibrosis ( n = 2). Complete clinical tumor resolution was noted in 10 and 8 patients over 12 and 16.5 weeks, respectively, in imiquimod and fluorouracil groups. Periocular skin erythema, chemical conjunctivitis, and skin depigmentation were seen in all the patients of imiquimod group. On the other hand, the local side-effect profile in fluorouracil patients was limited. Conclusion: The medical treatment of complex eyelid BCC is a useful alternative to surgery in the elderly with significant co-morbidities. It provides a promising long-term relief with a tolerable side-effect profile. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial would provide stronger evidence for the efficacy of these drugs.


2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 6617-6624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunrong Wu ◽  
Bo Li ◽  
Guiyin Sun ◽  
Chunfang Peng ◽  
Debing Xiang

2006 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Anzueto ◽  
Michael S. Niederman ◽  
James Pearle ◽  
Marcos I. Restrepo ◽  
Albrecht Heyder ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
Reinhard Sittl

Transdermal buprenorphine has been assessed as a therapy for chronic cancer and non-cancer pain in both clinical and postmarketing surveillance studies. Data from 239 patients who had participated in a follow-up study of up to six years have shown efficacy and safety, and good tolerability over prolonged treatment periods with a marked stability of doses. From the cancer pain population (134 patients), 20% stayed on transdermal buprenorphine until the end of their lives. Postmarketing surveillance study data from 13 179 patients, including 3690 cancer patients assessed during a 10-week observation period, showed that 81% of patients achieved good/very good pain relief with transdermal buprenorphine. Furthermore, 49.6% of patients did not require any analgesic comedication or rescue therapy, a point that is particularly important in the elderly population. Results from the Spanish Pain Society on transdermal buprenorphine in chronic non-cancer, neuropathic and cancer-related pain, and on switching from morphine, also confirmed its beneficial efficacy and safety, and showed that buprenorphine does not antagonize pain relief, or cause withdrawal when combined with full μ-agonists. The effectiveness of buprenorphine is further supported by evidence of its pronounced anti-hyperalgesic effect in a human pain model, which may be a factor in explaining the efficacy of buprenorphine in neuropathic pain. When switching of opioids is indicated to improve pain relief or reduce adverse events, equipotency dosage ratios are important. The equipotency ratio for morphine to buprenorphine, previously established as 75:1, is now being questioned as new data from a retrospective cohort study were published indicating a ratio of 100:1. Moreover, transdermal buprenorphine has superior safety in respect to respiratory depression, immunological and renal effects compared with standard World Health Organization step III opioids, which makes it highly suitable for treating moderate-to-severe pain also in cancer patients, a per se vulnerable patient population requiring a sensible selection of potent analgesics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document