Side-overlap esophagogastric tube (SO-EG) reconstruction after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy or laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction

Abstract In early 2000s, cervical anastomosis after esophagectomy was associated with a higher rate of recurrent nerve trauma than thoracic anastomosis. Recently, new technologies have been developed that reduce surgical complications. Mediastinoscopic esophagectomy is reportedly less invasive and allows faster recovery than thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) prevents recurrent laryngeal nerve (RNL) palsy. We present the case of minimally invasive mediastinoscopic Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy (MMIE) under IONM performed on an elderly esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma patient. Methods An 84-year old man was consulted for adenocarcinoma of GEJ without lymphnode metastasis. Despite his advanced age, he had no comorbidities. We planned to perform MMIE under IONM. The procedure started with a patient lithotomy, and three trocars plus small incision were made in the upper abdomen. Celiac lymphadenectomy was performed. Subsequently, a 35 mm incision was made in the left side of the neck and a monitor was attached to left vagus nerve. Three trocars were placed with single incision surgical devices and pneumomediastinum was noticed. Mediastinoscopic esophagectomy was performed. Gastric tube reconstruction via mediastinum with cervical anastomosis was performed. Results The operation was successful. Total operation time was 393 minutes, with an estimated blood loss of 5 mL. There were no intraoperative and postoperative complications, and no RLN palsy occurred. Conclusion MMIE with cervical anastomosis under IONM is safe and less invasive especially for the respiratory system as a thoracotomy is unnecessary. Video https://www.dropbox.com/s/9yqkzg3pm619pf6/%E7%B8%A6%E9%9A%94%E9%8F%A12%E5%88%8656%E7%A7%92.mp4?dl=0.

Download Full-text

Laparoscopic and left thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction cancer with right aortic arch: a case report

Surgical Case Reports ◽

10.1186/s40792-020-01071-w ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Motoki Murakami ◽

Yasutaka Nakanishi ◽

Yudai Hojo ◽

Tatsuro Nakamura ◽

Tsutomu Kumamoto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Esophagogastric Junction ◽

Right Aortic Arch ◽

Type Ii ◽

Siewert Type ◽

Ivor Lewis ◽

Siewert Type Ii ◽

Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽

Lateral Decubitus ◽

The Right

Abstract Background Right aortic arch (RAA) is a congenital malformation detected in 0.04% of the population without heterotaxia and makes esophagectomy and mediastinal lymphadenectomy difficult. A left thoracic approach is recommended in patients with RAA, but a minimally invasive procedure has not yet been established. Case presentation The case was a 40-year-old man with RAA and Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction with metastases to the adrenal glands and paraaortic lymph nodes. Conversion surgery was performed when radiologic disappearance of metastatic disease was confirmed after first-line treatment consisting of 12 cycles of S-1 plus platinum-based systemic chemotherapy. Minimally invasive laparoscopic and left thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was performed in the right semi-lateral decubitus position. The esophagus was easy to see on left thoracoscopy because of the RAA. Esophagectomy with lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy and an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis was performed successfully with laparoscopy and thoracoscopy without a position change. There were no surgical complications, and no residual cancer was detected in the resected specimen on pathological examination. There has been no recurrence during 21 months of follow-up. Conclusions Laparoscopic and left thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the right semi-lateral decubitus position is a minimally invasive, anatomically novel procedure for Siewert type II esophagogastric junction cancer in patients with RAA.

Download Full-text

Indocyanine green perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

Surgical Endoscopy ◽

10.1007/s00464-021-08346-9 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Keouna Pather ◽

Adeline M. Deladisma ◽

Christina Guerrier ◽

Isaac R. Kriley ◽

Ziad T. Awad

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Indocyanine Green ◽

Gastric Conduit ◽

Ivor Lewis ◽

Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽

Perfusion Assessment

Download Full-text

Two cases of intraoperative hemodynamic instability during combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic surgery for esophagogastric junction carcinoma

JA Clinical Reports ◽

10.1186/s40981-021-00419-x ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Makiko Tani ◽

Yoshikazu Matsuoka ◽

Mayu Sugihara ◽

Ayaka Fujii ◽

Tomoyuki Kanazawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Laparoscopic Surgery ◽

Esophagogastric Junction ◽

Intraoperative Complications ◽

Proximal Gastrectomy ◽

Tension Pneumothorax ◽

Hemodynamic Instability ◽

Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy ◽

Surgical Field ◽

Coronary Ischemia ◽

Thoracic And Abdominal

Abstract Background Intraoperative complications during combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic surgery for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) carcinoma have not been reported as compared to those during surgery for esophageal carcinoma. We present two cases which had surgery-related hemodynamic instability during laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy and intra-mediastinal valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy (vEG) with thoracoscopic mediastinal lymphadenectomy for EGJ carcinoma. Case presentation In case 1, the patient fell into hypotension with hypoxemia during laparoscopic vEG due to pneumothorax caused by entry of intraabdominal carbon dioxide. In case 2, ventricular arrythmia and ST elevation occurred during laparoscopic vEG. Pericardium retraction to secure surgical field during reconstruction compressed the coronary artery, which caused coronary malperfusion. These two events were induced by the surgical procedure, characterized by the following: (1) connection of the thoracic and abdominal cavities and (2) cardiac displacement during vEG. Conclusion These cases indicated tension pneumothorax and coronary ischemia are possible intraoperative complications specific to combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic surgery for EGJ carcinoma.

Download Full-text

792 OUTCOMES AFTER TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE VERSUS HYBRID OR OPEN IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ESODATA STUDY GROUP.

Diseases of the Esophagus ◽

10.1093/dote/doab052.792 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Berend Van Der Wilk ◽

Eliza R C Hagens ◽

Ben M Eyck ◽

Suzanne S Gisbertz ◽

Richard Hillegersberg ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Length Of Stay ◽

Minimally Invasive ◽

Anastomotic Leakage ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Mortality Data ◽

Study Group ◽

Ivor Lewis ◽

Open Esophagectomy ◽

Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽

The Impact

Abstract To compare complications following totally minimally invasive (TMIE), laparoscopically assisted (hybrid) and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Three randomized trials have reported benefits for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Two studies compared TMIE versus open esophagectomy and another compared hybrid versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Only small retrospective studies compared TMIE with hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Methods Data were used from the International Esodata Study Group assessing patients undergoing TMIE, hybrid or open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Primary outcome was pneumonia, secondary outcomes included incidence and severity of anastomotic leakage, (major) complications, length of stay, escalation of care and 90-day mortality. Data were analyzed using multivariate multilevel models. Results In total, 4733 patients were included in this study (TMIE:1472, hybrid:1364 and open:1897). Patients undergoing TMIE had lower incidence of pneumonia compared to hybrid (10.9% vs 16.3%, Odds Ratio (OR):0.56, 95%CI: 0.40–0.80) and open esophagectomy (10.9% vs 17.4%, OR:0.60, 95%CI: 0.42–0.84) and had shorter length of stay (median 10 days (IQR 8–16)) compared to hybrid (14 (11–19), p = 0.041) and open esophagectomy (11 (9–16), p = 0.027). Patients undergoing TMIE had higher rate of anastomotic leakage compared to hybrid (15.1% vs 10.7%, OR:1.47, 95%CI: 1.01–2.13) and open esophagectomy (7.3%, OR:1.73, 95%CI: 1.26–2.38). No differences were reported between hybrid and open esophagectomy. Conclusion Compared to hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, TMIE resulted in a lower pneumonia rate, a shorter hospital length of stay but a higher anastomotic leakage rate. The impact of these individual complications on survival and long-term quality of life should be further investigated.

Download Full-text

Modified Intrathoracic Esophagogastrostomy with Minimally Invasive Robot-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer

Digestive Surgery ◽

10.1159/000495361 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (3) ◽

pp. 218-225 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Wen-Ping Wang ◽

Long-Qi Chen ◽

Han-Lu Zhang ◽

Yu-Shang Yang ◽

Song-Lin He ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Circular Stapler ◽

Purse String Suture ◽

Robot Assisted ◽

Purse String ◽

Ivor Lewis ◽

Intrathoracic Anastomosis ◽

Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽

Estimated Blood Loss ◽

Esophagectomy For Cancer

Background: Intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy plays an important role in minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer. Intrathoracic anastomosis with robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (RAILE) includes hand-sewn and circular stapler methods, which remain technically challenging. In this study, we modified the techniques for intrathoracic anastomosis at RAILE, in order to simplify the complex procedures. Methods: “Side-insertion” technique was used for anvil placement and purse string suture for intrathoracic anastomosis at RAILE. Medical records for consecutive patients who had undergone robot-assisted minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer between January 2015 and June 2018 were analyzed. Results: A total of consecutive 31 patients were enrolled. There was no conversion to open thoracotomy in this cohort. Mean operation duration in the robotic group was 387.4 ± 68.2 min. Median estimated blood loss was 110 mL (range 50–400 mL). Two patients (6.5%) had postoperative anastomotic leak. No postoperative reoperation was needed and there were no mortality. Six patients (19.4%) had anastomotic stricture and 2 patients of them needed endoscopic dilation. Conclusion: RAILE is safe and feasible. Our modified procedure highlighting the “side-insertion” method may simplify the process of intrathoracic anvil placement and purse string suture for anastomosis at RAILE.

Download Full-text