Prognostic value of tumor budding in gallbladder cancer: application of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference scoring system

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han-Na Kim ◽  
Soo Yeon Lee ◽  
Baek-hui Kim ◽  
Chung-Yeul Kim ◽  
Aeree Kim ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (13) ◽  
pp. 4397-4404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hester C. van Wyk ◽  
Antonia Roseweir ◽  
Peter Alexander ◽  
James H. Park ◽  
Paul G. Horgan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Tumor budding is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer (CRC) and has recently been well-defined by the International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC). Objective The aim of the present study was to use the ITBCC budding evaluation method to examine the relationship between tumor budding, tumor factors, tumor microenvironment, and survival in patients with primary operable CRC. Methods Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of 952 CRC patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2007 were evaluated for tumor budding according to the ITBCC criteria. The tumor microenvironment was evaluated using tumor stroma percentage (TSP) and Klintrup–Makinen (KM) grade to assess the tumor inflammatory cell infiltrate. Results High budding (n = 268, 28%) was significantly associated with TNM stage (p < 0.001), competent mismatch repair (MMR; p < 0.05), venous invasion (p < 0.001), weak KM grade (p < 0.001), high TSP (p < 0.001), and reduced cancer-specific survival (CSS) (hazard ratio 8.68, 95% confidence interval 6.30–11.97; p < 0.001). Tumor budding effectively stratifies CSS stage T1 through to T4 (all p < 0.05) independent of associated factors. Conclusions Tumor budding effectively stratifies patients’ survival in primary operable CRC independent of other phenotypic features. In particular, the combination of T stage and budding should form the basis of a new staging system for primary operable CRC.


Haematologica ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 785-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Hivert ◽  
J. Tamburini ◽  
A. Vekhoff ◽  
O. Tournilhac ◽  
V. Leblond ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Dawson ◽  
Francesca Galuppini ◽  
Peter Träger ◽  
Martin D. Berger ◽  
Peter Studer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima El agy ◽  
Sanae El bardai ◽  
Laila Bouguenouch ◽  
Nada Lahmidani ◽  
Mohammed El abkari ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Tumor budding is now emerging as one of the robust and promising histological factors that play an important role in colon cancer. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between tumor budding and tumor clinicopathological factors, tumor molecular signature, and patient survival for the first time in the Moroccan population. Methods: We collected data of 100 patients with operated colon adenocarcinoma. Tumor budding was assessed on HES slides, according to the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference 2016 recommendations. The expression of MMR proteins was performed by Immunohistochemistry. KRAS and NRAS mutations testing was performed by Sanger sequencing and pyrosequençing. Results: High tumor budding grade (BUD 3) was found to be significantly associated with adverse clinicopathological features including older age (P=0.03), presence of perineural invasion (P=0.02), presence of vascular invasion (P=0.05), distant metastases (P˂0.001), advanced TNM stage (P=0.001), the occurrence of relapse (P=0.04), and the high number of deceased cases (P=0.02). Interestingly, we found that tumors with high budding were more likely to be microsatellite stable (MSS) (P=0.005) and harbor more KRAS mutations (P=0.02). In all stages, High tumor budding was correlated with poorer overall survival (P=0.04) and decreased relapse-free survival with a difference close to significance ((P=0.09). we concluded that high tumor budding was strongly associated with unfavorable clinicopathological features and special molecular biomarkers and effectively affects the overall survival of CC patients. Conclusions: Based on these findings and the ITBCC group recommendations, tumor budding should be taken into account along with other clinicopathologic factors in the risk assessment of colorectal cancer.


Der Pathologe ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Müller ◽  
Alessandro Lugli ◽  
Heather Dawson

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Bei einzelnen Patienten mit kolorektalen Karzinomen (CRC) zeigt sich ein schlechter klinischer Verlauf innerhalb desselben UICC-Stadiums (Union for International Cancer Control). Die Identifizierung von zusätzlichen Risikofaktoren ist daher notwendig, um eine optimale Therapieplanung zu erreichen. Fragestellung In welchen Situationen kann Tumor Budding die klinische Therapieentscheidung beeinflussen und wie sollte die standardisierte Auswertung erfolgen? Material und Methode Aktuelle Publikationen zum Thema Tumor Budding werden mit Fokus auf die praktische Anwendung und potenzielle Problemfälle in der Bestimmung des Tumor Buddings erläutert. Ergebnisse Tumor Budding ist ein signifikanter Risikofaktor für einen schlechteren Verlauf des CRC und kann bei pT1-Karzinomen sowie Stadium-II-Karzinomen die Behandlung beeinflussen. Die Auswertung wurde durch die International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016 standardisiert und ist in der Praxis anwendbar. Schwierigkeiten in der Anwendung können durch die Kenntnis von potenziellen Problemfällen vermieden werden.


Author(s):  
Leonardo Franz ◽  
Elisabetta Zanoletti ◽  
Sebastiano Franchella ◽  
Diego Cazzador ◽  
Niccolò Favaretto ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (21) ◽  
pp. 2671-2677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Teresa Voso ◽  
Susanna Fenu ◽  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Francesco Buccisano ◽  
Alfonso Piciocchi ◽  
...  

Purpose The definition of disease-specific prognostic scores plays a fundamental role in the treatment decision-making process in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), a group of myeloid disorders characterized by a heterogeneous clinical behavior. Patients and Methods We applied the recently published Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) to 380 patients with MDS, registered in an Italian regional database, recruiting patients from the city of Rome (Gruppo Romano Mielodisplasie). Patients were selected based on the availability of IPSS-R prognostic factors, including complete peripheral-blood and bone marrow counts, informative cytogenetics, and follow-up data. Results We validated the IPSS-R score as a significant predictor of overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) in MDS (P < .001 for both). When comparing the prognostic value of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), WHO Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), and IPSS-R, using the Cox regression model and the likelihood ratio test, a significantly higher predictive power for LFS and OS became evident for the IPSS-R, compared with the IPSS and WPSS (P < .001 for both). The multivariate analysis, including IPSS, WPSS, age, lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin concentration, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, transfusion dependency, and type of therapy, confirmed the significant prognostic value of IPSS-R subgroups for LFS and OS. Treatment with lenalidomide and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents was shown to be an independent predictor of survival in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion Our data confirm that the IPSS-R is an excellent prognostic tool in MDS in the era of disease-modifying treatments. The early recognition of patients at high risk of progression to aggressive disease may optimize treatment timing in MDS.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. H. Şirin ◽  
S. Sökmen ◽  
S. M. Ünlü ◽  
H. Ellidokuz ◽  
S. Sarioğlu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document