scholarly journals Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with localized or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy involving gemcitabine–cisplatin and high dose-intensity MVAC

Author(s):  
Yongjune Lee ◽  
Young Seok Kim ◽  
Bumsik Hong ◽  
Yong Mee Cho ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongjune Lee ◽  
Young Seok Kim ◽  
Bumsik Hong ◽  
Yong Mee Cho ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee

Abstract PurposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of high dose-intensity combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin and cisplatin (HD MVAC) with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) or locally advanced upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). Patients and MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted for patients with UC (cT2-4aN0-1M0) who received NAC from January 2011 and December 2017 at Asan Medical Center. Pathologic complete response (pCR), down-staging (<ypT2 and no N upstaging), disease-free survival (DFS), OS and safety were compared for each regimen. ResultsOut of a total of 277 patients, 176 patients received GC and 41 patients received HD MVAC. With the exception of age (patients receiving GC were younger; p=0.002), other baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. pCR rates were 27.0% for GC and 22.6% for HD MVAC (p=0.62), and down-staging rate was 50.8% for GC and 58.1% for HD MVAC (p=0.47). There were no differences in OS (72.1% vs 73.1% for GC vs HD MVAC; p=0.58) and DFS (54.9% vs 63.3% for GC vs HD MVAC; p=0.21) at 3 years. HD MVAC with prophylactic G-CSF was associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia (p<0.001) than GC. The NAC regimen was not an independent prognostic factor for OS. ConclusionsOncologic outcomes were not significantly different between the GC and HD MVAC when used as NAC in MIBC/UTUC.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (11) ◽  
pp. 1567-1573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari ◽  
Michael Kongnyuy ◽  
Pranav Sharma ◽  
Mayer N. Fishman ◽  
Scott M. Gilbert ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kenichi Matsumoto ◽  
Akihiko Miyamoto ◽  
Tomoya Kawase ◽  
Taro Murai ◽  
Yuta Shibamoto

Abstract Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose (≥55 Gy) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (CCIMRT) in comparison with chemotherapy alone and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) alone for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: Forty-six patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing CCIMRT (n = 17), chemotherapy alone (n = 16) or IMRT alone (n = 13) were analysed. Overall survival (OS), locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and gastrointestinal toxicities were evaluated. The median radiation dose was 60 Gy (range, 55–60) delivered in a median of 25 fractions (range, 24–30). Gemcitabine (GEM) alone, GEM + S-1, S-1 alone, FOLFIRINOX and GEM + nab-paclitaxel were used in CCIMRT and chemo-monotherapy. Results: The 1-year OS rate was 69% in the CCIMRT group, 27% in the chemotherapy group and 38% in the IMRT group (p = 0·12). The 1-year LRPFS rate was 73, 0 and 40% in the 3 groups, respectively (p = 0·012). Acute Grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea, diarrhea) was observed in 12% (2/17) in the CCIMRT group, 25% (4/16) in the chemotherapy group and 7·7% (1/13) in the IMRT group (p = 0·38). Late Grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding was observed in 6·3% (1/16) in the chemotherapy group. Conclusion: High-dose CCIMRT yielded acceptable toxicity and favorable OS and LRPFS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document