scholarly journals Thoracoscopic management of volvulus of the gastric conduit following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 3098-3098
Author(s):  
Jeremy Linson ◽  
Michael Latzko ◽  
Bestoun Ahmed ◽  
Ziad Awad
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Gastric Conduit ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

Indocyanine green perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keouna Pather ◽  
Adeline M. Deladisma ◽  
Christina Guerrier ◽  
Isaac R. Kriley ◽  
Ziad T. Awad
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Indocyanine Green ◽  
Gastric Conduit ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
Perfusion Assessment

Near infrared perfusion assessment of gastric conduit during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 216 (3) ◽  
pp. 524-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian G.A. Dalton ◽  
Abubaker A. Ali ◽  
Marie Crandall ◽  
Ziad T. Awad
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Gastric Conduit ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
Perfusion Assessment

VS03.05: VASCULAR ASSESSMENT OF THE GASTRIC TUBE IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY USING INDOCYANINE GREEN

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 48-48
Author(s):  
Dulce Nombre De Maria Momblan ◽  
Victor Turrado-Rodriguez ◽  
Alba Torroella ◽  
Ainitze Ibarzabal ◽  
Arlena Sofia Espinoza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Indocyanine Green ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Vascular Supply ◽  
Gastric Conduit ◽  
Leak Rate ◽  
Esophagogastric Anastomosis ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

Abstract Description One of the major concerns in esophagic surgery is the safety of the esophagogastric anastomosis. Anastomotic leak is associated with important morbidity and mortality. Leak rates have been reported in 4.7% of patients in the Ivor-Lewis procedure and 5.2% for cervical anastomosis. Leak rate has been associated with insufficient vascular supply to the gastric conduit. Indocyanine green (ICG) assessment of the vascularization may be a useful tool to avoid this dreadful complication. Methods A 50-year-old man with medical history of high blood pressure and right pneumothorax was diagnosed of adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus cT3N3. Neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy following CROSS principles was administered. Six weeks after the end of neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy a minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was performed. ICG helped the identification of the right gastroepiploic arcade and of the adequate vascular supply to the gastric conduit. During thoracoscopy, ICG was helpful to assess the vascular supply to the gastric conduit after pull-up into the chest and to check the vascularization of the esophagogastric anastomosis. Results Postoperative evolution was uneventful. Oral intake was resumed on the third postoperative day. Patient was discharged on the 8th postoperative day. Conclusions ICG assessment of the vascularization of the gastric conduit is feasible, safe and helpful in Ivor-Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy and may decrease the leak rate. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

792 OUTCOMES AFTER TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE VERSUS HYBRID OR OPEN IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ESODATA STUDY GROUP.

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Berend Van Der Wilk ◽  
Eliza R C Hagens ◽  
Ben M Eyck ◽  
Suzanne S Gisbertz ◽  
Richard Hillegersberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Open Esophagectomy ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract   To compare complications following totally minimally invasive (TMIE), laparoscopically assisted (hybrid) and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Three randomized trials have reported benefits for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Two studies compared TMIE versus open esophagectomy and another compared hybrid versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Only small retrospective studies compared TMIE with hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Methods Data were used from the International Esodata Study Group assessing patients undergoing TMIE, hybrid or open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Primary outcome was pneumonia, secondary outcomes included incidence and severity of anastomotic leakage, (major) complications, length of stay, escalation of care and 90-day mortality. Data were analyzed using multivariate multilevel models. Results In total, 4733 patients were included in this study (TMIE:1472, hybrid:1364 and open:1897). Patients undergoing TMIE had lower incidence of pneumonia compared to hybrid (10.9% vs 16.3%, Odds Ratio (OR):0.56, 95%CI: 0.40–0.80) and open esophagectomy (10.9% vs 17.4%, OR:0.60, 95%CI: 0.42–0.84) and had shorter length of stay (median 10 days (IQR 8–16)) compared to hybrid (14 (11–19), p = 0.041) and open esophagectomy (11 (9–16), p = 0.027). Patients undergoing TMIE had higher rate of anastomotic leakage compared to hybrid (15.1% vs 10.7%, OR:1.47, 95%CI: 1.01–2.13) and open esophagectomy (7.3%, OR:1.73, 95%CI: 1.26–2.38). No differences were reported between hybrid and open esophagectomy. Conclusion Compared to hybrid and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, TMIE resulted in a lower pneumonia rate, a shorter hospital length of stay but a higher anastomotic leakage rate. The impact of these individual complications on survival and long-term quality of life should be further investigated.

Modified Intrathoracic Esophagogastrostomy with Minimally Invasive Robot-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Ping Wang ◽  
Long-Qi Chen ◽  
Han-Lu Zhang ◽  
Yu-Shang Yang ◽  
Song-Lin He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Circular Stapler ◽  
Purse String Suture ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Purse String ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Intrathoracic Anastomosis ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Esophagectomy For Cancer

Background: Intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy plays an important role in minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer. Intrathoracic anastomosis with robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (RAILE) includes hand-sewn and circular stapler methods, which remain technically challenging. In this study, we modified the techniques for intrathoracic anastomosis at RAILE, in order to simplify the complex procedures. Methods: “Side-insertion” technique was used for anvil placement and purse string suture for intrathoracic anastomosis at RAILE. Medical records for consecutive patients who had undergone robot-assisted minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer between January 2015 and June 2018 were analyzed. Results: A total of consecutive 31 patients were enrolled. There was no conversion to open thoracotomy in this cohort. Mean operation duration in the robotic group was 387.4 ± 68.2 min. Median estimated blood loss was 110 mL (range 50–400 mL). Two patients (6.5%) had postoperative anastomotic leak. No postoperative reoperation was needed and there were no mortality. Six patients (19.4%) had anastomotic stricture and 2 patients of them needed endoscopic dilation. Conclusion: RAILE is safe and feasible. Our modified procedure highlighting the “side-insertion” method may simplify the process of intrathoracic anvil placement and purse string suture for anastomosis at RAILE.

scholarly journals There is no correlation between a delayed gastric conduit emptying and the occurrence of an anastomotic leakage after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Babic ◽  
Lars Mortimer Schiffmann ◽  
Hans Friedrich Fuchs ◽  
Dolores Thea Mueller ◽  
Thomas Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anastomotic Leakage ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Gastric Conduit ◽  
Common Finding ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Ivor Lewis ◽  
Stapling Device ◽  
Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy ◽  
Cervical Reconstruction ◽  
Prolonged Hospital

Abstract Introduction Esophagectomy is the gold standard in the surgical therapy of esophageal cancer. It is either performed thoracoabdominal with a intrathoracic anastomosis or in proximal cancers with a three-incision esophagectomy and cervical reconstruction. Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) is the most common functional postoperative disorder after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (IL). Pneumonia is significantly more often in patients with DGCE. It remains unclear if DGCE anastomotic leakage (AL) is associated. Aim of our study is to analyze, if AL is more likely to happen in patients with a DGCE. Patients and methods 816 patients were included. All patients have had an IL due to esophageal/esophagogastric-junction cancer between 2013 and 2018 in our center. Intrathoracic esophagogastric end-to-side anastomosis was performed with a circular stapling device. The collective has been divided in two groups depending on the occurrence of DGCE. The diagnosis DGCE was determined by clinical and radiologic criteria in accordance with current international expert consensus. Results 27.7% of all patients suffered from DGCE postoperatively. Female patients had a significantly higher chance to suffer from DGCE than male patients (34.4% vs. 26.2% vs., p = 0.040). Pneumonia was more common in patients with DGCE (13.7% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.025), furthermore hospitalization was longer in DGCE patients (median 17 days vs. 14d, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of type II anastomotic leakage, (5.8% in both groups DGCE). All patients with ECCG type II AL (n = 47; 5.8%) were treated successfully by endoluminal/endoscopic therapy. The subgroup analysis showed that ASA ≥ III (7.6% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.05) and the histology squamous cell carcinoma (9.8% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.01) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of an AL. Conclusion Our study confirms that DGCE after IL is a common finding in a standardized collective of patients in a high-volume center. This functional disorder is associated with a higher rate of pneumonia and a prolonged hospital stay. Still, there is no association between DGCE and the occurrence of an AL after esophagectomy. The hypothesis, that an DGCE results in a higher pressure on the anastomosis and therefore to an AL in consequence, can be refuted. DGCE is not a pathogenetic factor for an AL.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document