Gastric ischemic conditioning prior to esophagectomy reduces anastomotic leaks and strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Uzair M. Jogiat ◽  
Warren Y. L. Sun ◽  
Jerry T. Dang ◽  
Valentin Mocanu ◽  
Janice Y. Kung ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Rhaí André Arriel ◽  
Jéssica Ferreira Rodrigues ◽  
Hiago Leandro Rodrigues de Souza ◽  
Anderson Meireles ◽  
Luís Filipi Moutinho Leitão ◽  
...  

It has been demonstrated that brief cycles of ischemia followed by reperfusion (IR) applied before exercise can improve performance and, IR intervention, applied immediately after exercise (post-exercise ischemic conditioning – PEIC) exerts a potential ergogenic effect to accelerate recovery. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to identify the effects of PEIC on exercise performance, recovery and the responses of associated physiological parameters, such as creatine kinase, perceived recovery and muscle soreness, over 24 h after its application. From 3281 studies, six involving 106 subjects fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Compared to sham (cuff administration with low pressure) and control interventions (no cuff administration), PEIC led to faster performance recovery (p=0.004; ES=-0.49) and lower increase in creatine kinase (p<0.001; ES=-0.71) and muscle soreness (p<0.001; ES=-0.89) over 24 h. The effectiveness of this intervention is more pronounced in subjects with low/moderate fitness level and at least a total time of 10 min of ischemia (e.g. 2 cycles of 5 min) is necessary to promote positive effects.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kamarajah Sivesh ◽  
Lin Aaron ◽  
Tharmaraja Thahesh ◽  
Bharwada Yashvi ◽  
R Bundred James ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Anastomotic leaks (AL) are a major complication after oesophagectomy. This meta-analysis aimed to determine identify risks factors for AL (pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative factors) and assess the consequences to outcome on patients who developed an AL. Methods This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines and eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 31st December 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random-effects modelling and prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration CRD42018130732). Results This review identified 174 studies reporting outcomes of 74,226 patients undergoing oesophagectomy. The overall pooled AL rates were 11%, ranging from 0 - 49% in individual studies. Majority of studies were from Asia (n=79). In pooled analyses, 23 factors were associated with AL (17 preoperative and six intraoperative). AL were associated with adverse outcomes including pulmonary (OR: 4.54, CI95%: 2.99 - 6.89, p<0.001) and cardiac complications (OR: 2.44, CI95%: 1.77 - 3.37, p<0.001), prolonged hospital stay (mean difference: 15 days, CI95%: 10 - 21 days, p<0.001 and in-hospital mortality (OR: 5.91, CI95%: 1.41 - 24.79, p=0.015). Conclusion AL are a major complication following oesophagectomy accounting for major morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis identified modifiable risk factors for AL which can be a target for interventions to reduce anastomotic leak rates. Furthermore, identification of both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors will facilitate risk stratification and prediction of AL enabling better perioperative planning, patient counselling and informed consent.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sivesh K Kamarajah ◽  
Aaron Lin ◽  
Thahesh Tharmaraja ◽  
Yashvi Bharwada ◽  
James R Bundred ◽  
...  

Summary Anastomotic leaks (AL) are a major complication after esophagectomy. This meta-analysis aimed to determine identify risks factors for AL (preoperative, intra-operative, and post-operative factors) and assess the consequences to outcome on patients who developed an AL. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, and eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 31 December 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random-effects modeling and prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration CRD42018130732). This review identified 174 studies reporting outcomes of 74,226 patients undergoing esophagectomy. The overall pooled AL rates were 11%, ranging from 0 to 49% in individual studies. Majority of studies were from Asia (n = 79). In pooled analyses, 23 factors were associated with AL (17 preoperative and six intraoperative). AL were associated with adverse outcomes including pulmonary (OR: 4.54, CI95%: 2.99–6.89, P &lt; 0.001) and cardiac complications (OR: 2.44, CI95%: 1.77–3.37, P &lt; 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (mean difference: 15 days, CI95%: 10–21 days, P &lt; 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (OR: 5.91, CI95%: 1.41–24.79, P = 0.015). AL are a major complication following esophagectomy accounting for major morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis identified modifiable risk factors for AL, which can be a target for interventions to reduce AL rates. Furthermore, identification of both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors will facilitate risk stratification and prediction of AL enabling better perioperative planning, patient counseling, and informed consent.


Author(s):  
Nicola Reeves ◽  
Irene Vogel ◽  
Arash Ghoroghi ◽  
James Ansell ◽  
Julie Cornish ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. e42179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Brevoord ◽  
Peter Kranke ◽  
Marijn Kuijpers ◽  
Nina Weber ◽  
Markus Hollmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document