Peritoneal cytokines as a predictor of colorectal anastomotic leaks on postoperative day 1: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Nicola Reeves ◽  
Irene Vogel ◽  
Arash Ghoroghi ◽  
James Ansell ◽  
Julie Cornish ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kamarajah Sivesh ◽  
Lin Aaron ◽  
Tharmaraja Thahesh ◽  
Bharwada Yashvi ◽  
R Bundred James ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Anastomotic leaks (AL) are a major complication after oesophagectomy. This meta-analysis aimed to determine identify risks factors for AL (pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative factors) and assess the consequences to outcome on patients who developed an AL. Methods This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines and eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 31st December 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random-effects modelling and prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration CRD42018130732). Results This review identified 174 studies reporting outcomes of 74,226 patients undergoing oesophagectomy. The overall pooled AL rates were 11%, ranging from 0 - 49% in individual studies. Majority of studies were from Asia (n=79). In pooled analyses, 23 factors were associated with AL (17 preoperative and six intraoperative). AL were associated with adverse outcomes including pulmonary (OR: 4.54, CI95%: 2.99 - 6.89, p<0.001) and cardiac complications (OR: 2.44, CI95%: 1.77 - 3.37, p<0.001), prolonged hospital stay (mean difference: 15 days, CI95%: 10 - 21 days, p<0.001 and in-hospital mortality (OR: 5.91, CI95%: 1.41 - 24.79, p=0.015). Conclusion AL are a major complication following oesophagectomy accounting for major morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis identified modifiable risk factors for AL which can be a target for interventions to reduce anastomotic leak rates. Furthermore, identification of both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors will facilitate risk stratification and prediction of AL enabling better perioperative planning, patient counselling and informed consent.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sivesh K Kamarajah ◽  
Aaron Lin ◽  
Thahesh Tharmaraja ◽  
Yashvi Bharwada ◽  
James R Bundred ◽  
...  

Summary Anastomotic leaks (AL) are a major complication after esophagectomy. This meta-analysis aimed to determine identify risks factors for AL (preoperative, intra-operative, and post-operative factors) and assess the consequences to outcome on patients who developed an AL. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, and eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 31 December 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random-effects modeling and prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (Registration CRD42018130732). This review identified 174 studies reporting outcomes of 74,226 patients undergoing esophagectomy. The overall pooled AL rates were 11%, ranging from 0 to 49% in individual studies. Majority of studies were from Asia (n = 79). In pooled analyses, 23 factors were associated with AL (17 preoperative and six intraoperative). AL were associated with adverse outcomes including pulmonary (OR: 4.54, CI95%: 2.99–6.89, P &lt; 0.001) and cardiac complications (OR: 2.44, CI95%: 1.77–3.37, P &lt; 0.001), prolonged hospital stay (mean difference: 15 days, CI95%: 10–21 days, P &lt; 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (OR: 5.91, CI95%: 1.41–24.79, P = 0.015). AL are a major complication following esophagectomy accounting for major morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis identified modifiable risk factors for AL, which can be a target for interventions to reduce AL rates. Furthermore, identification of both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors will facilitate risk stratification and prediction of AL enabling better perioperative planning, patient counseling, and informed consent.


Author(s):  
Uzair M. Jogiat ◽  
Warren Y. L. Sun ◽  
Jerry T. Dang ◽  
Valentin Mocanu ◽  
Janice Y. Kung ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kamarajah Sivesh ◽  
R Bundred James ◽  
Singh Pritam ◽  
Pasquali Sandro ◽  
A Griffiths Ewen

Abstract Aims This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluates the evidence for the techniques for oesophagogastric (OG) anastomosis and their impact on perioperative outcomes. Background Current evidence on the benefits of different anastomotic techniques (hand-sewn (HS), circular stapled (CS), triangular stapler (TS) or linear stapler/semi-mechanical (LSSM) techniques after oesophagectomy is conflicting. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted to identify randomised and non-randomised studies reporting techniques for the OG anastomosis. Network meta-analysis of postoperative anastomotic leaks and strictures was performed. Results This study included 15 randomised and 22 non-randomised studies (n=8,618). LSSM (OR: 0.49, CI95%: 0.33 - 0.74, p=0.001) and CS (OR: 0.68, CI95%: 0.48 - 0.95, p=0.027) and anastomoses were associated with lower anastomotic leak rates than HS anastomosis. LSSM anastomosis was found to be superior to CS (OR: 0.15, CI95%: 0.08 - 0.28, p <0.001), TS (OR: 0.32, CI95%: 0.19 - 0.54, p <0.001) and HS (OR: 0.15, CI95%: 0.05 - 0.46, p=0.001) anastomoses respectively in anastomotic stricture rates. LSSM was ranked the best technique with high probability for anastomotic leaks and strictures. Conclusions Stapled anastomoses, specifically LSSM were associated with lower anastomotic leaks and strictures rates following oesophagectomy. Therefore, current evidence suggests superiority of the LSSM technique for OG anastomosis.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Wei ◽  
Yan Meng ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Liyong Chen

The purpose of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if low-ratio n-6/n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation affects serum inflammation markers based on current studies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 535-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi ◽  
Mahdi Vajdi

Abstract. Backgrounds: Central obesity, as a pivotal component of metabolic syndrome is associated with numerous co-morbidities. Dietary factors influence central obesity by increased inflammatory status. However, recent studies didn’t evaluate the association between central obesity and dietary inflammation index (DII®) that give score to dietary factors according to their inflammatory potential. In the current systematic review and meta-analysis, we summarized the studies that investigated the association between DII® with central obesity indices in the general populations. Methods: In a systematic search from PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Sciences and Cochrane electronic databases, we collected relevant studies written in English and published until 30 October 2019. The population of included studies were apparently healthy subjects or individuals with obesity or obesity-related diseases. Observational studies that evaluated the association between DII® and indices of central obesity including WC or WHR were included. Results: Totally thirty-two studies were included; thirty studies were cross-sectional and two were cohort studies with 103071 participants. Meta-analysis of observational studies showed that higher DII® scores were associated with 1.81 cm increase in WC (Pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) = 1.813; CI: 0.785–2.841; p = 0.001). Also, a non-significant increase in the odds of having higher WC (OR = 1.162; CI: 0.95–1.43; p = 0.154) in the highest DII category was also observed. In subgroup analysis, the continent, dietary assessment tool and gender were the heterogeneity sources. Conclusion: The findings proposed that adherence to diets with high DII® scores was associated with increased WC. Further studies with interventional designs are necessary to elucidate the causality inference between DII® and central obesity indices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document