Total organic carbon (TOC) enrichment and source rock evaluation of the Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous rocks (Barents Sea) by means of geochemical and log data

Author(s):  
Francesco Cappuccio ◽  
Massimiliano Porreca ◽  
Kamaldeen Olakunle Omosanya ◽  
Giorgio Minelli ◽  
Dicky Harishidayat
2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Liu ◽  
Jinglun Ren ◽  
Jianfei Lyu ◽  
Xueying Lyu ◽  
Yuelin Feng

The K1s, K1d, K1t, and K1a Formations are potential source rock intervals for hydrocarbon formation, all of which are part of the Lower Cretaceous system in the Baibei Depression in the Erlian Basin in China. However, no well has found oil flow because the hydrocarbon-generating potential of the source rocks has not been comprehensively evaluated. Based on organic geochemical and petrological analyses, all the source rocks possess highly variable total organic carbon and S1 + S2 contents. Total organic carbon and S1 + S2 contents indicate that the K1a2 Formation through the K1d1 Formation are source rocks that have fair to good generative potential and the K1d2 Formation through the K1s Formation are source rocks that have good to very good generative potential. The organic matter in the K1a2 Formation is dominated by Type I and II kerogen; thus, it is considered to be oil prone based on H/C versus O/C plots. Most of the analyzed samples were deposited in reducing environments and sourced from marine algae; thus, they are oil prone. However, only two source rock intervals were thermally mature with vitrinite reflectance values in the required range. Hydrocarbon-generating histories show that the K1t and K1a2 intervals began to generate hydrocarbons during the depositional period of the K1d2 and K1d3 Formations, respectively, and stopped generating hydrocarbons at the end of the depositional period of the late Cretaceous. Therefore, the main stage of hydrocarbon migration and accumulation was between the depositional period of the K1d2 and K1s Formations, and the critical moment was the depositional period of the late K1s Formation. The generation conversion efficiency reached approximately 55% in the K1a2 Formation and 18% in the K1t Formation at the end of the Cretaceous sedimentary stage. In general, the effective oil traps are those reservoirs that are near the active source rock in the generating sags in the Baibei Depression.


GeoArabia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 91-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thamer K. Al-Ameri ◽  
Amer Jassim Al-Khafaji ◽  
John Zumberge

ABSTRACT Five oil samples reservoired in the Cretaceous Mishrif Formation from the Ratawi, Zubair, Rumaila North and Rumaila South fields have been analysed using Gas Chromatography – Mass Spectroscopy (GC-MS). In addition, fifteen core samples from the Mishrif Formation and 81 core samples from the Lower Cretaceous and Upper Jurassic have been subjected to source rock analysis and palynological and petrographic description. These observations have been integrated with electric wireline log response. The reservoirs of the Mishrif Formation show measured porosities up to 28% and the oils are interpreted as being sourced from: (1) Type II carbonate rocks interbedded with shales and deposited in a reducing marine environment with low salinity based on biomarkers and isotopic analysis; (2) Upper Jurassic to Lower Cretaceous age based on sterane ratios, analysis of isoprenoids and isotopes, and biomarkers, and (3) Thermally mature source rocks, based on the biomarker analysis. The geochemical analysis suggests that the Mishrif oils may have been sourced from the Upper Jurassic Najma or Sargelu formations or the Lower Cretaceous Sulaiy Formation. Visual kerogen assessment and source rock analysis show the Sulaiy Formation to be a good quality source rock with high total organic carbon (up to 8 wt% TOC) and rich in amorphogen. The Lower Cretaceous source rocks were deposited in a suboxic-anoxic basin and show good hydrogen indices. They are buried at depths in excess of 5,000 m and are likely to have charged Mishrif reservoirs during the Miocene. The migration from the source rock is likely to be largely vertical and possibly along faults before reaching the vuggy, highly permeable reservoirs of the Mishrif Formation. Structural traps in the Mishrif Formation reservoir are likely to have formed in the Late Cretaceous.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document