The association of transversus abdominis plane block with length of stay, pain and opioid consumption after anterior or lateral lumbar fusion: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Jacqueline Reisener ◽  
Alexander P. Hughes ◽  
Ichiro Okano ◽  
Jiaqi Zhu ◽  
Shuting Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane

Factors Associated with a Short (10 Days) Length of Stay after Colectomy: A Multivariate Analysis of over 400 Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 960-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle G. Cologne ◽  
Sean Byers ◽  
David R. Rosen ◽  
Grace S. Hwang ◽  
Adrian E. Ortega ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Transfusion Requirements ◽  
American Society

A prospectively maintained database of 415 patients undergoing colectomy was evaluated. We performed a logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with 1) length of stay (LOS) of 2 days or less and 2) LOS of 10 days or more. Investigated variables included demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, diagnosis, operative procedure, approach and time, transfusion requirements, and occurrence of any complications. Factors associated with a LOS of two days or less included ASA [odds ratio (OR): 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.208–0.576], use of transversus abdominis plane block (OR: 5.259, 95% CI: 2.825–9.791), and operative time (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.974–0.986). Age >65 had an OR of 1.73, though this did not reach statistical significance. Factors associated with LOS >10 days included ASA (OR: 2.152, 95% CI: 1.245–3.721), anastomotic leak (OR: 2.163, 95% CI: 1.486–3.148), ileus (OR: 8.790, 95% CI: 4.501–17.165), and surgical site infection (OR: 5.846, 95% CI: 2.764–12.362). Cancer and transfusion status were associated but did not reach statistical significance. Although operative time was longer in left-sided resections, no differences in LOS were observed. In conclusion, numerous factors are associated with short or long LOS and may help stratify resource utilization after colectomy. Further study is needed to confirm our findings.

The Impact of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block within an ERAS Protocol on Length of Stay

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Stoner ◽  
Michael Preston ◽  
William C. Mustain ◽  
Jason S. Mizell ◽  
Gregory Mehaffey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Eras Protocol ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Benefits of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia after Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 345-358
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Pain Scores

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing bariatric surgery present unique analgesic challenges, including poorly controlled pain, increased prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea, and opioid-induced respiratory depression. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective component of multimodal analgesia for a variety of abdominal surgeries. OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefits of the TAP block on postoperative analgesia and recovery in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases from inception to April 2020 for studies using TAP block in bariatric surgeries and reporting postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and recovery-related outcomes. Primary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, and recovery-related outcomes (e.g., length of stay, time to ambulation). Outcomes were pooled using random effects model and reported as relative risks (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (15 RCTs [n = 1410] and 6 nonrandomized studies [n = 1959]) were included. Among RCTs, the TAP block group required fewer opioid rescues (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.42, P < 0.001) (moderate quality); reduced total opioid use over 24 hours (MD –8.33; 95% CI –14.78 to –1.89, P = 0.01); decreased time to ambulation (MD –1.12 hours; 95% CI –1.50 to –0.73, P < 0.001) (high quality); and had significantly lower pain scores at 6 hours (MD –1.52; 95% CI –1.90 to –1.13, P < 0.01) and 12 hours (MD –0.95; 95% CI –1.34 to –0.56, P < 0.001) on a 0-10 pain scale (moderate quality). No difference was observed for nausea and vomiting, or hospital length of stay. Meta-analyzed outcomes from observational studies supported these results, suggesting decreased postoperative pain and opioid consumption. LIMITATIONS: Studies varied with respect to type of surgery and components of comparator multimodal analgesia, likely contributing to heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses by type of comparator group were conducted to address these differences. We were unable to extract data from all trials included due to variability in outcomes reporting, such as non-opioid drugs for postoperative pain management or invalid dosages. Pain-related outcomes may be affected by operative differences leading to variation in visceral pain. Observational studies have their inherent limitations, such as confounding due to lack of participant randomization and intervention blinding, potentially affecting subjective outcomes, such as pain scores, as well as provider-dependent outcomes, such as hospital length of stay. Lastly, there was significant variation of TAP block technique across all studies. CONCLUSION: TAP block is an effective, safe modality that can be performed under anesthesia. It decreases pain, opioid use, and time to ambulation after bariatric surgeries and should be considered in multimodal analgesia for enhanced recovery in this high-risk surgical population. KEY WORDS: Analgesia, bariatric surgery, enhanced recovery after surgery, multimodal analgesia, opioid-sparing analgesia, pain, postoperative, regional block, transversus abdominis plane block

Impact of transversus abdominis plane blocks versus non-steroidal anti-inflammatory on post-operative opioid use in ERAS ovarian cancer surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1372-1376
Author(s):  
Steven Peter Bisch ◽  
Joni Kooy ◽  
Sarah Glaze ◽  
Anna Cameron ◽  
Pamela Chu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Anti Inflammatory

BackgroundTreatment of ovarian cancer often requires extensive surgical resection. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been utilized in benign gynecologic surgery to decrease post-operative pain and opioid use. We hypothesized that TAP blocks would decrease total opioid use in the first 24 hours and decrease length of stay following staging and cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer compared with either no local anesthetic or local wound infiltration alone.MethodsAll patients undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer from November 2016 to June 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Median opioid use at 24, 48, and 72 hours post-operatively, as well as length of stay, were assessed. Multivariate median regression analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounders: post-operative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) usage, pre-operative opioid consumption, and extent of cytoreductive surgery. Length of stay was compared using Cox regression analysis.ResultsOne-hundred-and-twenty patients were included in the analysis. Eighty-two patients had a TAP block, while 38 did not. After adjusting for potential confounders there was no difference in median 24 hours opioid consumption (p=0.29) or length of stay (HR 0.95, p=0.78) between patients receiving TAP block compared with those without. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients receiving scheduled NSAIDs had a 2.6-fold greater likelihood of being discharged (p<0.0005) and a significant reduction in median opioid use at 24 hours (23.5 vs 14.5 mg) (p=0.017) compared with those patients without NSAIDs.DiscussionPost-operative administration of NSAIDs, but not TAP block, was associated with a decrease in post-operative opioid use and length of stay following surgery for ovarian cancer. Further investigation into alternative regional anesthetics for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols is warranted.

scholarly journals Opioid Consumption after Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Abdominal Hysterectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley S Moon ◽  
Dorothy Wakefield ◽  
Joann Petrini ◽  
Vaagn Andikyan ◽  
Erin Panarelli
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane

Efficacy of The Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparison With Conventional Port- Site Infiltration

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-47
Author(s):  
Kalpana Kharbuja ◽  
Jeevan Singh ◽  
Sangina Ranjit ◽  
Barun Bahadur Pradhan ◽  
Ashish Shrestha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Tap Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Post Operative Pain

Introduction: Pain experienced following laparoscopic cholecystectomy derives significantly from incision made in anterior abdominal wall. Many patients experience moderate to severe pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound guided bilateral subcostal transversus abdominal plane (TAP) block with port-site infiltration for post-operative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Sixty patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to two groups to receive port-site infiltration of local anaesthesia or ultrasound guided subcostal TAP block at the end of surgery before extubation. All patients received 1 gm paracetamol intravenously 8 hourly. Post-operative pain was assessed using visual analogue score at 0,1,2,4,8,16 and 24 hours. Time to first analgesic requirement and total opioid consumption over 24 hours were recorded. Results: Ultrasound guided bilateral subcostal transversus abdominis plane block significantly reduced post-operative pain score compared to port site infiltration. We observed statistically significant differences in visual analogue score between two groups at all other time frame. The 24 hours opioid consumption was less in Subcostal TAP (136±66.31μg VS 202±80.58μg, p=0.001). Time for rescue analgesia was prolonged in patient receiving subcostal TAP (3.63±2.09 hrs VS 1.73±1.60 hrs, p=0.0002). Conclusion: Ultrasound guided bilateral subcostal transversus abdominal block provides superior post-operative analgesia and reduced opioid consumption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to port-site infiltration.  

The efficacy of continuous subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after living liver donation: a retrospective study

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiko Maeda ◽  
Sho Carl Shibata ◽  
Hiroshi Wada ◽  
Shigeru Marubashi ◽  
Takahiko Kamibayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Plane ◽  
Liver Donation ◽  
Living Liver Donation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document