Factors Associated with a Short (10 Days) Length of Stay after Colectomy: A Multivariate Analysis of over 400 Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (10) ◽  
pp. 960-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle G. Cologne ◽  
Sean Byers ◽  
David R. Rosen ◽  
Grace S. Hwang ◽  
Adrian E. Ortega ◽  
...  

A prospectively maintained database of 415 patients undergoing colectomy was evaluated. We performed a logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with 1) length of stay (LOS) of 2 days or less and 2) LOS of 10 days or more. Investigated variables included demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, diagnosis, operative procedure, approach and time, transfusion requirements, and occurrence of any complications. Factors associated with a LOS of two days or less included ASA [odds ratio (OR): 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.208–0.576], use of transversus abdominis plane block (OR: 5.259, 95% CI: 2.825–9.791), and operative time (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.974–0.986). Age >65 had an OR of 1.73, though this did not reach statistical significance. Factors associated with LOS >10 days included ASA (OR: 2.152, 95% CI: 1.245–3.721), anastomotic leak (OR: 2.163, 95% CI: 1.486–3.148), ileus (OR: 8.790, 95% CI: 4.501–17.165), and surgical site infection (OR: 5.846, 95% CI: 2.764–12.362). Cancer and transfusion status were associated but did not reach statistical significance. Although operative time was longer in left-sided resections, no differences in LOS were observed. In conclusion, numerous factors are associated with short or long LOS and may help stratify resource utilization after colectomy. Further study is needed to confirm our findings.

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Stoner ◽  
Michael Preston ◽  
William C. Mustain ◽  
Jason S. Mizell ◽  
Gregory Mehaffey ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-116
Author(s):  
Aftab Hussain ◽  
Akhtar Hussain ◽  
Rehana Feroze ◽  
Muhammad Akram ◽  
Muhammad Asif Saleem ◽  
...  

Objective: To study the effects of adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in transverses abdominis plane block in comparison with using bupivacaine alone. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective comparative study that was conducted in the Anaesthesia Department, CMH, Lahore over a period of six months from 1st June 2020 to 30th November 2020. Fifty patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologist Class I and II with an age range between 40 to 60 years were divided into two groups. Group B received 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 2ml of normal saline on each side in the transversus abdominis plane block while group BD was given 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine 0.5mcg/kg on each side (in a volume of 2ml). Post-operative pain was assessed with a visual analogue scale. Rescue analgesia was given when a score of greater than 3 was observed using this scale. Time to first rescue analgesia was noted. Total opioid consumption in the first 24 hours was also recorded. Patients were observed for postoperative hypotension and bradycardia.Results: The mean-time for the first dose of analgesia for group B and BD was 302.92 ± 24.01 and 419.28 ± 31.97 minutes respectively with a p-value of 0.001. The mean of the total consumption of opioids in 24 hours post-operatively for group B and BD was 14.20±2.36 and 10.40±1.38 mg respectively with a p-value of 0.001. Hypotension was not seen in any patient in either group. Only one patient developed bradycardia and he belonged to group BD. P-value was 0.327.Conclusion: The addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine for transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia significantly prolongs the duration of analgesia and reduces the postoperative opioid requirements.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 37-41
Author(s):  
Minh Nguyen Van ◽  
Nga Bui Thi Thuy ◽  
Thinh Tran Xuan

Background: The transversus abdominis plane block (TAP block), a regional block, provides effective analgesia after lower abdominal surgeries. The objective of this study was to assess whether transversus abdominis plane block is effective as part of multimodal pain management following Cesarean section. Materials and Method: Totally, 60 ASA I and II parturients for Cesarean section via Pfannenstiel incision under spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated to either the TAP block group or the control. The TAP block group received a landmark-orientated, bilateral TAP block with 0.25% levobupivacain 17,5ml each side in the triangle of Petit. Postoperative pain treatment followed the same protocole for both groups with 1gram paracetamol intravenously and received patrient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine. The time to first request of analgesic, morphine consumption, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and side effects were scored at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 h postoperatively. Results: The time to first request of analgesic was longer, morphine consumption was lower in TAP group than in the control (p < 0.05). Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at rest and on mouvement were similar in two groups at 2h, but lower in TAP group from 4h (p < 0.05). No severe adverse effects were detected in two groups. Conclusion: TAP block prolonged the time to fisrt request of analgesic and reduced morphine consumption, the VAS pain scores significantly both at rest and on mouvement. Therefore, TAP block is feasible and effective as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen after Caesarean section. Key words: Caesarean section, multimodal pain management, transversus abdominis plane block


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document