Treatment of stable extra-capsular hip fractures with a sliding screw versus short gamma nail: a retrospective study of 102 patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhay R. Patel ◽  
Chris Boyes ◽  
Vladimir Shur
Injury ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. S2
Author(s):  
P. Georgiannos ◽  
I. Bisbinas ◽  
M. Sawidis ◽  
M. Karanassos ◽  
I. Theodoroudis ◽  
...  

Injury ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 747-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assaf Kadar ◽  
Ofir Chechik ◽  
Eldad Katz ◽  
Itay Blum ◽  
Gabrielle Meghiddo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Madharam Bishnoi ◽  
Tabish Tahir Kirmani ◽  
Najmul Huda ◽  
Gaurav Chahal ◽  
Sandeep Bishnoi

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Hip fractures are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population posing significant burden on health care resources. The purpose of this study is to determine the epidemiological analysis of hip fractures at a tertiary care center.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a retrospective study done on patients with hip fractures admitted during the period 2015-2017 in Moradabad district of Uttar Pradesh. Case files and radiographs of patients were reviewed for age, gender, nature of trauma, associated comorbidities, type of fracture and presence of osteoporosis.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> During the 2015-2017 period, 2214 patients with hip fractures were admitted, out of which 1180 were males and rest females. The mean age of patients was 56.8 years with 41.6% belonging to age group 60-75 years. In elderly patients, a low energy simple fall accounted for &gt;85% of fractures with presence of significant osteoporosis (Singh’s index grade 3). The in hospital mortality was 2.1%. Hip fracture characteristics included intertrochanteric 57.81%, femoral neck 30.26% and sub trochanteric 11.93%. Smoking and medical comorbidities were present in a significant number of patients.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> With increased longevity, hip fractures are an increasing health care problem. Various preventive measures for osteoporosis and falls will decline the prevalence of these fractures.</p>


Injury ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. S8-S9 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Goulidakis ◽  
S. Theocharakis ◽  
V. Chronopoulos ◽  
E. Drakoulakis ◽  
A. Pastroudis

2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahmir Sadic ◽  
Svemir Custovic ◽  
Mahir Jasarevuc ◽  
Mirsad Fazlic ◽  
Ferid Krupic

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Saarenpää ◽  
T. Heikkinen ◽  
J. Partanen ◽  
P. Jalovaara

Backgrounds and Aims: The standardized forms of the Standardized Audit of Hip Fractures in Europe (SAHFE) are aimed for the evaluation of hip fracture treatment in different hospitals and countries. The purpose was to evaluate and characterize a cohort of hip fracture patients with these forms and to evaluate their value in quality control. Material and Methods: The non-pathological hip fractures in patients over 49 years of age treated in the Oulu University Hospital were prospectively recorded during a one-year period using SAHFE forms. Results: There were 238 (52 male and 186 female) patients with a mean age of 78 (50–102) years. Fifty-nine percent of the patients were admitted from their own homes. Fifty-seven percent were able to walk alone outdoors and 48% could walk without walking aids before the fracture. A hundred and fifty patients had cervical fractures and 88 trochanteric fractures. The most frequent treatment of cervical fractures was Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty (68%) and that of trochanteric fractures Gamma nail fixation (86%). At four months after the fracture, 50% lived in their own homes, 33% could walk alone out-doors and 13% could walk without any aids. Thirty-two percent had no pain in the hip. The overall mortality at four months was 17.6% and that of the operated patients 16.2%. The reoperation rate was 8.5%. Conclusion: SAHFE forms were very useful in the evaluation of the quality of the hip fracture treatment.


Bone ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 430-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Maria Alves ◽  
Theodoros Economou ◽  
Carla Oliveira ◽  
Ana Isabel Ribeiro ◽  
Nuno Neves ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document