Percutaneous retrograde intramedullary single wire fixation for metacarpal shaft fracture of the little finger

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 883-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Hong Han ◽  
Seung-Yong Rhee ◽  
Soon-Chul Lee ◽  
Seung-Chul Han ◽  
Yoon-Sik Cha
2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 629-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALPHONSUS K. S. CHONG ◽  
WINSTON Y. C. CHEW

Dislocations of the ulnar carpometacarpal joint are easily missed because of a low index of suspicion as well as their subtle clinical and radiological features. Often, the presence of a more obvious adjacent injury also draws attention away from the carpometacarpal joint. Two cases of ring finger metacarpal shaft fractures with associated little finger carpometacarpal joint dislocations are presented. In both cases, the metacarpal fractures were diagnosed but the carpometacarpal joint dislocations were initially overlooked. The presence of an apparently isolated ring finger metacarpal fracture due to an indirect force should raise the possibility of an associated carpometacarpal joint injury.


2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo Hong Han ◽  
Hyung Ku Yoon ◽  
Dong Eun Shin ◽  
Seung Chul Han ◽  
Young Woong Kim

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung-Cheng Chiu ◽  
Tsung-Yu Ho ◽  
Yen-Nien Ting ◽  
Ming-Tzu Tsai ◽  
Heng-Li Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Metacarpal shaft fracture is a common fracture in hand trauma injuries. Surgical intervention is indicated when fractures are unstable or involve considerable displacement. Current fixation options include Kirschner wire, bone plates, and intramedullary headless screws. Common complications include joint stiffness, tendon irritation, implant loosening, and cartilage damage. Objective We propose a modified fixation approach using headless compression screws to treat transverse or short-oblique metacarpal shaft fracture. Materials and methods We used a saw blade to model transverse metacarpal neck fractures in 28 fresh porcine metacarpals, which were then treated with the following four fixation methods: (1) locked plate with five locked bicortical screws (LP group), (2) regular plate with five bicortical screws (RP group), (3) two Kirschner wires (K group), and (4) a headless compression screw (HC group). In the HC group, we proposed a novel fixation model in which the screw trajectory was oblique to the long axis of the metacarpal bone. The entry point of the screw was in the dorsum of the metacarpal neck, and the exit point was in the volar cortex of the supracondylar region; thus, the screw did not damage the articular cartilage. The specimens were tested using a modified three-point bending test on a material testing system. The maximum fracture forces and stiffness values of the four fixation types were determined by observing the force–displacement curves. Finally, the Kruskal–Wallis test was adopted to process the data, and the exact Wilcoxon rank sum test with Bonferroni adjustment was performed to conduct paired comparisons among the groups. Results The maximum fracture forces (median ± interquartile range [IQR]) of the LP, RP, HC, and K groups were 173.0 ± 81.0, 156.0 ± 117.9, 60.4 ± 21.0, and 51.8 ± 60.7 N, respectively. In addition, the stiffness values (median ± IQR) of the LP, HC, RP, and K groups were 29.6 ± 3.0, 23.1 ± 5.2, 22.6 ± 2.8, and 14.7 ± 5.6 N/mm, respectively. Conclusion Headless compression screw fixation provides fixation strength similar to locked and regular plates for the fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures. The headless screw was inserted obliquely to the long axis of the metacarpal bone. The entry point of the screw was in the dorsum of the metacarpal neck, and the exit point was in the volar cortex of the supracondylar region; therefore the articular cartilage iatrogenic injury can be avoidable. This modified fixation method may prevent tendon irritation and joint cartilage violation caused by plating and intramedullary headless screw fixation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung-Cheng Chiu ◽  
Cheng-En Hsu ◽  
Tsung-Yu Ho ◽  
Yen-Nien Ting ◽  
Ming-Tzu Tsai ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Metacarpal shaft fractures are a common hand trauma. The current surgical fixation options for such fractures include percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning and nonlocking and locking plate fixation. Although bone plate fixation, compared with Kirschner wire pinning, has superior fixation ability, a consensus has not been reached on whether the bone plate is better placed on the dorsal or lateral side. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fixation of locking and regular bone plates on the dorsal and lateral sides of a metacarpal shaft fracture. Materials and methods Thirty-five artificial metacarpal bones were used in the experiment. Metacarpal shaft fractures were created using a saw blade, which were then treated with four types of fixation as follows: (1) a locking plate with four locking bicortical screws on the dorsal side (LP_D); (2) a locking plate with four locking bicortical screws on the lateral side (LP_L); (3) a regular plate with four regular bicortical screws on the dorsal side (RP_D); (4) a regular plate with four regular bicortical screws on the lateral side (RP_D); and (5) two K-wires (KWs). All specimens were tested through cantilever bending tests on a material testing system. The maximum fracture force and stiffness of the five fixation types were determined based on the force–displacement data. The maximum fracture force and stiffness of the specimens with metacarpal shaft fractures were first analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s test. Results The maximum fracture force results of the five types of metacarpal shaft fracture were as follows: LP_D group (230.1 ± 22.8 N, mean ± SD) ≅ RP_D group (228.2 ± 13.4 N) > KW group (94.0 ± 17.4 N) > LP_L group (59.0 ± 7.9 N) ≅ RP_L group (44.5 ± 3.4 N). In addition, the stiffness results of the five types of metacarpal shaft fracture were as follows: LP_D group (68.7 ± 14.0 N/mm) > RP_D group (54.9 ± 3.2 N/mm) > KW group (20.7 ± 5.8 N/mm) ≅ LP_L group (10.6 ± 1.7 N/mm) ≅ RP_L group (9.4 ± 1.2 N/mm). Conclusion According to our results, the mechanical strength offered by lateral plate fixation of a metacarpal shaft fracture is so low that even KW fixation can offer relatively superior mechanical strength; this is regardless of whether a locking or nonlocking plate is used for lateral plate fixation. Such fixation can reduce the probability of extensor tendon adhesion. Nevertheless, our results indicated that when lateral plate fixation is used for fixating a metacarpal shaft fracture in a clinical setting, whether the mechanical strength offered by such fixation would be strong enough to support bone union remains questionable.


2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. P. WESTBROOK ◽  
T. R. C. DAVIS

This study assessed the reliability, responsiveness and validity of two clinical measurements for the assessment of malunion of little finger metacarpal neck and shaft fractures. Both compared the relative lengths of the ring and little fingers in the injured and contralateral hands. One measurement was taken with the metacarpophalangeal joints extended (straight-MCP), and the other with them flexed to 90° (90-MCP). Ninety-five percent of the differences between the relative lengths of the ring and little fingers in the two hands of 50 normal subjects were less than 3 mm and the 95% limits of agreement for repeat measurements (intra-observer reproducibility) was ±1 mm for both measurements. Both measurements were significantly altered in a group of 218 patients with a past history of a metacarpal shaft or neck fracture. Although both measurements correlated with the patient’s assessment of the cosmetic result ( p = 0.01), neither measurement correlated with the severity of palmar angulation of the fracture at presentation. It is concluded that these measurements are reliable and responsive, but their validity is uncertain.


1998 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Soo Joong Choi ◽  
Chang Kyun Lim ◽  
Ho Guen Chang ◽  
Jun Dong Chang ◽  
Chang Ju Lee

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. van Bussel ◽  
R. M. Houwert ◽  
T. J. M. Kootstra ◽  
M. van Heijl ◽  
D. Van der Velde ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document