Factors influencing lumbar spine bone mineral density assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: Comparison with lumbar spinal radiogram

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Kinoshita ◽  
Tetsuya Tamaki ◽  
Tsutomu Hashimoto ◽  
Fumiyoshi Kasagi
Radiology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 271 (3) ◽  
pp. 778-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian L. Wichmann ◽  
Christian Booz ◽  
Stefan Wesarg ◽  
Konstantinos Kafchitsas ◽  
Ralf W. Bauer ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 79-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Sung Kim ◽  
Eun Sun Jeong ◽  
Myung Hwa Yang ◽  
Seoung-Oh Yang

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 227.2-228
Author(s):  
D. Claire ◽  
M. Geoffroy ◽  
L. Kanagaratnam ◽  
C. Isabelle ◽  
A. Hittinger ◽  
...  

Background:Dual energy X-ray absoprtiometry is the reference method to mesure bone mineral density (1). Loss of bone mineral density is significant if it exceeds the least significant change. The threshold value used in general population is 0,03 g/cm2 (2). Patients with obesity are known for having a higher bone mineral density due to metabolism and physiopathology characteristics (3,4).Objectives:The aim of our study was to determine the least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity.Methods:We conducted an interventionnal study in 120 patients with obesity who performed a bone densitometry. We measured twice the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, the femoral neck and the total hip in the same time (5,6). We determined the least significant change in bone densitometry from each pair of measurements, using the Bland and Altman method. We also determined the least significant change in bone densitometry according to each stage of obesity.Results:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is 0,046g/cm2 at the lumbar spine, 0.069 g/cm2 at the femoral neck and 0.06 g/cm2 at the total hip.Conclusion:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is higher than in general population. These results may improve DXA interpretation in this specific population, and may personnalize their medical care.References:[1]Lees B, Stevenson JC. An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. mai 1992;2(3):146-52.[2]Briot K, Roux C, Thomas T, Blain H, Buchon D, Chapurlat R, et al. Actualisation 2018 des recommandations françaises du traitement de l’ostéoporose post-ménopausique. Rev Rhum. oct 2018;85(5):428-40.[3]Shapses SA, Pop LC, Wang Y. Obesity is a concern for bone health with aging. Nutr Res N Y N. mars 2017;39:1-13.[4]Savvidis C, Tournis S, Dede AD. Obesity and bone metabolism. Hormones. juin 2018;17(2):205-17.[5]Roux C, Garnero P, Thomas T, Sabatier J-P, Orcel P, Audran M, et al. Recommendations for monitoring antiresorptive therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Jt Bone Spine Rev Rhum. janv 2005;72(1):26-31.[6]Ravaud P, Reny JL, Giraudeau B, Porcher R, Dougados M, Roux C. Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res. août 1999;14(8):1449-56.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


2000 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 371
Author(s):  
Min Jung Cha ◽  
Seung Cheol Kim ◽  
Young Seok Lee ◽  
Young Pyo Chang ◽  
Jin Young Park

Spinal Cord ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 628-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
W A Bauman ◽  
E Schwartz ◽  
I S Y Song ◽  
S Kirshblum ◽  
C Cirnigliaro ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document