A multicenter study of patients with adult-onset Still’s disease compared with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 639-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Salih Pay ◽  
Nuran Türkçapar ◽  
Mukaddes Kalyoncu ◽  
İsmail Şimşek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Adult Onset Still’S Disease ◽  
Adult Onset ◽  
Still’S Disease ◽  
Still's Disease ◽  
Adult Onset Still's Disease

scholarly journals The Role of Interleukin 18/Interleukin 18-Binding Protein in Adult-Onset Still’s Disease and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 430
Author(s):  
Charlotte Girard-Guyonvarc’h ◽  
Mathilde Harel ◽  
Cem Gabay
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Free Form ◽  
Adult Onset Still’S Disease ◽  
Adult Onset ◽  
Still’S Disease ◽  
Interleukin 18 ◽  
Still's Disease ◽  
Adult Onset Still's Disease

Interleukin 18 (IL-18) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine of the IL-1 family, whose activity is tightly controlled at the level of production, as well as signalization. Notably, it is buffered by its natural inhibitor, IL-18 binding protein (IL-18BP), which is massively present in circulation in normal and in most pathological conditions, thus preventing harmful pro-inflammatory systemic effects of IL-18. IL-18 has long been considered to be involved in the pathophysiology of various inflammatory diseases. However, a first clinical trial using recombinant IL-18BP for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis gave disappointing results. Direct measurements of unbound, bioactive, free form of circulating IL-18 demonstrated that IL-18 was more specifically involved in adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) but also in their most severe complication, macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). More importantly, administration of recombinant IL-18BP to patients with AOSD, and sJIA with MAS, showed promising results. This review summarizes available data regarding IL-18 and IL-18BP in AOSD and sJIA in mouse models and humans and shows the importance of IL-18/IL-18BP imbalance in these conditions, leading to the conclusion that IL-18, particularly free IL-18, may be a useful biomarker in these diseases and an interesting therapeutic target.

scholarly journals An Update on the Pathogenic Role of Neutrophils in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Adult-Onset Still’s Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 13038
Author(s):  
Ji-Won Kim ◽  
Mi-Hyun Ahn ◽  
Ju-Yang Jung ◽  
Chang-Hee Suh ◽  
Hyoun-Ah Kim
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Immune Defense ◽  
Adult Onset Still’S Disease ◽  
Adult Onset ◽  
Still’S Disease ◽  
Still's Disease ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Adult Onset Still's Disease

Neutrophils are innate immune phagocytes that play a key role in immune defense against invading pathogens. The main offensive mechanisms of neutrophils are the phagocytosis of pathogens, release of granules, and production of cytokines. The formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) has been described as a novel defense mechanism in the literature. NETs are a network of fibers assembled from chromatin deoxyribonucleic acid, histones, and neutrophil granule proteins that have the ability to kill pathogens, while they can also cause toxic effects in hosts. Activated neutrophils with NET formation stimulate autoimmune responses related to a wide range of inflammatory autoimmune diseases by exposing autoantigens in susceptible individuals. The association between increased NET formation and autoimmunity was first reported in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-related vasculitis, and the role of NETs in various diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriasis, has since been elucidated in research. Herein, we discuss the mechanistic role of neutrophils, including NETs, in the pathogenesis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (SJIA) and adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD), and provide their clinical values as biomarkers for monitoring and prognosis.

scholarly journals Cytokine profile in adult-onset Still's disease: Comparison with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

2016 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
pp. 8-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natsumi Inoue ◽  
Masaki Shimizu ◽  
Shinichiro Tsunoda ◽  
Mitsuhiro Kawano ◽  
Masami Matsumura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Cytokine Profile ◽  
Adult Onset Still’S Disease ◽  
Adult Onset ◽  
Still’S Disease ◽  
Still's Disease ◽  
Adult Onset Still's Disease

scholarly journals Management of adult-onset Still’s disease with interleukin-1 inhibitors: evidence- and consensus-based statements by a panel of Italian experts

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Serena Colafrancesco ◽  
◽  
Maria Manara ◽  
Alessandra Bortoluzzi ◽  
Teodora Serban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interleukin 1 ◽  
Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis ◽  
Delphi Process ◽  
Adult Onset Still’S Disease ◽  
Adult Onset ◽  
Still’S Disease ◽  
Biologic Treatment ◽  
Still's Disease ◽  
Late Treatment ◽  
Adult Onset Still's Disease

Abstract Background Adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) is a rare inflammatory condition characterized by fever, rash, and arthritis. Because of its rarity, clinical trials are inherently small and often uncontrolled. Our objective was to develop recommendations for the use of interleukin (IL)-1 inhibitors in the management of patients with AOSD, based on the best evidence and expert opinion. Methods A panel of 10 experts (9 rheumatologists and 1 pediatrician) was established. The first step was dedicated to a comprehensive literature review and development of statements. Two separate literature searches were performed on the MEDLINE (Pubmed), EMBASE, and BIOSIS databases through April 2018 to identify (1) differences and similarities between AOSD and pediatric Still’s disease (systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis [SJIA]) and (2) the efficacy and safety of IL-1 inhibitors in AOSD treatment. In the second step, the statements were submitted in a Delphi process to a panel of 67 rheumatologists. Consensus threshold was set at 66%: positive, > 66% of voters selected scores 3 to 5; negative, > 66% of voters selected scores 1 or 2. In the third step, the voting results were analyzed, and the statements were finalized. Results Eleven statements were developed. Forty-six of 67 rheumatologists (72%) participated in the Delphi process. A positive consensus was reached after the first round of voting and was full (> 95%) on the majority of statements. A large consensus was achieved in considering AOSD and SJIA as the same disease. The use of anti-IL-1 therapies in refractory patients was considered quite safe and effective both as the first and as a subsequent line of biologic treatment, especially in systemic patients. Because of the lack of head-to-head comparisons, a different profile of efficacy among IL-1 inhibitors could not be established. There was a large consensus that failure of the first IL-1 inhibitor does not preclude response to another one. The lack of studies comparing early versus late treatment did not allow to draw conclusions; however, data from SJIA suggest a better response in early treatment. Conclusions The Delphi method was used to develop recommendations that we hope will help clinicians in the management of patients with AOSD refractory to conventional therapies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document