Rapid Isolation of DNA from Fresh and Preserved Fish Scales for Polymerase Chain Reaction

2001 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gen Hua Yue ◽  
Laszlo Orban
2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhe Li ◽  
Yasmeen Gul ◽  
Zexia Gao ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
Weimin Wang

Genomics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan A. Ledbetter ◽  
David L. Nelson ◽  
Stephen T. Warren ◽  
David H. Ledbetter

1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 791-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
BRIAN T. BLOOMQUIST ◽  
RICHARD C. JOHNSON ◽  
RICHARD E. MAINS

Author(s):  
G. W. Hacker ◽  
I. Zehbe ◽  
J. Hainfeld ◽  
A.-H. Graf ◽  
C. Hauser-Kronberger ◽  
...  

In situ hybridization (ISH) with biotin-labeled probes is increasingly used in histology, histopathology and molecular biology, to detect genetic nucleic acid sequences of interest, such as viruses, genetic alterations and peptide-/protein-encoding messenger RNA (mRNA). In situ polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (PCR in situ hybridization = PISH) and the new in situ self-sustained sequence replication-based amplification (3SR) method even allow the detection of single copies of DNA or RNA in cytological and histological material. However, there is a number of considerable problems with the in situ PCR methods available today: False positives due to mis-priming of DNA breakdown products contained in several types of cells causing non-specific incorporation of label in direct methods, and re-diffusion artefacts of amplicons into previously negative cells have been observed. To avoid these problems, super-sensitive ISH procedures can be used, and it is well known that the sensitivity and outcome of these methods partially depend on the detection system used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document