Extracranial-intracranial bypass for internal carotid/middle cerebral atherosclerotic steno-occlusive diseases in conjunction with carotid endarterectomy for contralateral cervical carotid stenosis: clinical results and cognitive performance

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 633-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Inoue ◽  
Kazuhiro Ohwaki ◽  
Akira Tamura ◽  
Kazuo Tsutsumi ◽  
Isamu Saito ◽  
...  
Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoaki Terada ◽  
Mitsuharu Tsuura ◽  
Hiroyuki Matsumoto ◽  
Osamu Masuo ◽  
Tomoyuki Tsumoto ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The surgical benefit to pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is controversial. Because the benefit of carotid endarterectomy for pseudo-occlusion of the ICA remains uncertain, we examined the use of carotid stenting as a possible alternative treatment for this condition. METHODS: Twenty cases of carotid pseudo-occlusion (17 symptomatic, three asymptomatic) were treated with carotid artery stenting. Nineteen patients were treated with various embolic protection techniques. Our clinical results, including angiographic follow-up data, perioperative complications, and data on the effectiveness of the embolic protection methods were studied for ICA pseudo-occlusion. RESULTS: All pseudo-occlusions were successfully dilated, and the stenotic ratio was reduced from 95 to 6.7% on average. No neurological deterioration was encountered in any of the cases, although one patient died of cardiac event 1 day after treatment. None of the patients experienced stroke during the mean 24.8 month follow-up period, although one patient died from myocardial infarction. Among the 17 cases in which follow-up angiography was performed at 6 months after stenting, only one patient demonstrated restenosis. This patient was successfully treated with repeated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The rate of restenosis in our series was 5.9%, and the morbidity/mortality rate within 30 days was 5%. CONCLUSION: The clinical results of carotid stenting for ICA pseudo-occlusion under embolic protection were fairly good from the viewpoints of periprocedural neurological morbidity, angiographic follow-up results, and stroke prevention. Carotid stenting can be considered an alternative to carotid endarterectomy in patients with ICA pseudo-occlusion.


Author(s):  
V. Ju. Anysienkova ◽  

To study a comparative assessment of risk factors for atherogenesis in patients with different clinical manifestations of carotid atherosclerotic stenosis. The study included 106 patients (men — 74, women — 32) aged 39 to 79 years (mean age 62.6 ± 0.9), which devided to 3 clinical groups: Group I — 35 patients with acute atherothrombotic stroke with ipsilateral carotid stenosis, group II — 41 patients after acute cerebrovascular events and carotid endarterectomy, group III — 30 patients with asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid stenosis and the control group, which consisted of 20 relatively healthy individuals. The degree of stenosis of the internal carotid arteries was highest (> 70 %) in the group of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy. In addition in this group was prevalence younger men, compared with the group of asymptomatic stenosis and women (p = 0.00300), there was an older age of patients and moderate stenosis of 50–69 % (p = 0.00647). In patients with stenotic atherosclerosis of the internal carotid artery, there was a significant increase in the level of Lp-PLA2 compared with the control. This confirms that Lp-PLA2 can be considered as a marker of carotid atherosclerosis and influence the development of ischemic stroke. The highest level of Lp-PLA2 was observed in the clinical group of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy after ischemic stroke and there was a tendency to a more significant increase in total cholesterol. This suggests a more aggressive course of the atherosclerotic process in patients in this group.


2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
Subash Kanti Dey ◽  
Lipy Bakshi ◽  
Md Shahidullah ◽  
Ahsan Habib ◽  
Manabendra Battacharya ◽  
...  

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard investigation to assess the extracranial stenosis of carotid vessels. But this is an invasive diagnostic tool. So it is still a controversial issue whether duplex ultrasound is an alternative to DSA for measurement of stenosis of carotid vessels. This prospective crossectional observational study was conducted in the department of Neurology, BSMMU, Dhaka from May 2012 to April 2013 to assess the diagnostic accuracy of duplex ultrasound and its potential to replace DSA before performing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting. Total of 38 patients, 33 patients of nondisabling ischaemic stroke and 5 patients with history of TIAs whose extracranial carotid stenosis was >50% on duplex ultrasound were selected for DSA. DSA was done on these vessels and stenosis was measured using NASCET criteria. Results of USD and DSA were compared to determine the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of duplex ultrasound (USD). At 70% stenosis of right internal carotid artery and left internal carotid artery the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 93.8%, 63.7%, 89.5% and 93.3%, 75%, 89.5% respectively. This level of diagnostic efficiency of USD is less than that of DSA of carotid arteries. It was found in this study that, USD underestimates or overestimates the degree of carotid stenosis. DSA was safe and effective in determining stenosis in this study & there was no 67 complication. So before taking any decision for carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting, digital subtraction angiography of carotid vessels should be done. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bmj.v43i2.21385 Bangladesh Med J. 2014 May; 43 (2): 67-71


2012 ◽  
Vol 140 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 528-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Djordje Radak ◽  
Slobodan Tanaskovic ◽  
Srdjan Babic ◽  
Nikola Aleksic

Carotid endarterectomy has been established as the preferred treatment for symptomatic and asymptomatic high-grade carotid stenosis. Internal carotid artery restenosis is defined as a specific entity with a great clinical significance in carotid surgery due to accompanied increased future cerebral ischemic events risk. Carotid restenosis is the result of neointimal hyperplasia in the early postoperative period (within 36 months) or recurrent atherosclerotic lesions at a later date. While the restenotic lesions caused by neointimal hyperplasia are determined by ultrasound as smooth lesions, atherosclerotic carotid stenosis has almost the same ultrasound and angiographic characteristics as primary atherosclerotic lesions. Some authors believe that patients with internal carotid artery restenosis have insignificant risk of stroke or progression to total occlusion, and suggest conservative treatment only. On the other hand, many surgeons have more aggressive attitude towards the treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis and indicate surgical treatment in asymptomatic patients with carotid restenosis above 80%. The aim of our paper was to present a review of literature available data concerning etiology, pathophysiology, clinical significance and treatment of carotid restenosis following endarterectomy. Numerous studies have reported satisfactory results of redo endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty as treatment options of carotid restenosis. Carotid angioplasty for primary atherosclerotic lesions treatment is accompanied by a high carotid restenosis rate and therefore its role in primary carotid symptomatic and asymptomatic stenosis treatment is still the issue of numerous debates and the subject of extensive ongoing clinical studies worldwide.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Haydar Yaşa ◽  
Övünç Aslan ◽  
Barçın Özcem ◽  
Muhammet Akyuz ◽  
Ali Gürbüz ◽  
...  

According to the literature data, the prevalence of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy ranges between 6 and 36%. The etiological factor is intimal hyperplasia for early period, whereas it is atherosclerosis for late period. A 67-year-old male patient admitted to our clinic with a history of headache and minor stroke. His medical history was significant for right carotid endarterectomy 8 years ago. Recent Doppler ultrasound and digital substraction angiography revealed 75% stenosis and kinking corresponding to the segment distal to the endarterectomy region. Surgical endarterectomy is the treatment of choice in critical carotid stenosis. Endovascular therapy is primarily considered for patients if there is restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. However, the treatment modality is controversial in cases with concomitant carotid stenosis and kinking of internal carotid artery. We present our surgical approach to a case with significant stenosis and kinking of internal carotid artery. We performed a 6-mm-PTFE graft interposition between common and internal carotid artery and resection of the kinking segment.


1994 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
Antonio La Rosa ◽  
Angelo Argenteri ◽  
Marco Cugnasca ◽  
Guido Rossi ◽  
Attilio Odero

Purpose: The effects of ultrasonic endarterectomy, evaluated experimentally and clinically, were compared with the results obtained with conventional endarterectomy. Methods: Experimental: An ultrasonic vascular dissector with a frequency of 29 kHz was used for ultrasonic endarterectomy. Gross and histologic observation was made on 22 fresh human cadaver atherosclerotic vessels, of which 16 were treated with ultrasound endarterectomy and 6 conventionally. Clinical: Twenty-eight patients requiring carotid endarterectomy were chosen at random. Seven patients underwent ultrasonic endarterectomy after traditional access surgery, while 21 patients were treated with conventional endarterectomy. In the clinical study, an intraoperative gross observation of the endarterectomized surfaces was made, followed by duplex scanning after 18 and 24 months. Results: Histologic observation of the cadaveric vessels revealed particularly smooth surfaces in 87.5%; there was no debris, flaps, or vessel damage in any of the ultrasonically treated samples. In contrast, the traditional technique produced regular surfaces without residual debris in only 50% of the experimental cases. Favorable results were also seen in the clinical carotid experience, in which there was no need to surgically correct the ultrasonically endarterectomized surface in any case. In fact, achieving a satisfactory outcome was greatly facilitated by the use of ultrasound. In the conventionally treated patients, however, only 19% (4) demonstrated a smooth luminal surface on gross observation even after surgical correction. No postoperative complications were encountered in either group, and no restenosis has occurred in ultrasonic endarterectomy-treated patients after 2 years. Conclusions: Favorable experimental results using ultrasonic endarterectomy prompted the successful clinical application of this new technique in carotid stenosis treatment. Whether or not ultrasonic endarterectomy can reduce postoperative morbidity and restenosis is still under study.


2008 ◽  
Vol 136 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 494-497
Author(s):  
Momcilo Colic ◽  
Dragica Jadranin ◽  
Dejan Markovic ◽  
Lazar Davidovic

INTRODUCTION Treatment of carotid stenosis could be surgical: eversion endarterectomy, conventional endarterectomy and patch-plasty, resection with graft interposition and bypass procedure or, in the past few years, carotid artery angioplasty (PTA) with stent implantation. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to present early results of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting, as well as to identify indications for this procedure. METHOD Twenty-three patients with stenosis of internal carotid artery were included in the prospective study which was performed in the period from July 2006 to July 2007. For PTA and stenting of the carotid artery we used Balloon dilatation catheter Ultra-softTM SV and Carotid WallstentTM MonorailTM. During the procedure, brain protection by embolic protection system Filter Wire EZ was essentially performed. Descriptive statistical methods were performed to present and describe the patient characteristics, risk factors and results. RESULTS 23 patients were examined. In four (17.39%) cases there was asymptomatic, while in 19 (82.61%) there was symptomatic homodynamic significant stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Four of these 19 patients (17.39%) had late restenosis following carotid endarterectomy, four (17.39%) important respiratory failure, and 11 (47.83%) important heart disease. Patients were followed up for the first 30 postopertive days. In that period, there were no mortality and no needs for surgical conversions. In one case (4.35%), residual stenosis of 30% remained. Two patients (8.70%) had TIA and one (4.35%) had CVI. CONCLUSION Main indications for PTA and stenting of carotid arteries are: surgically inaccessible lesions (at or above C2; or subclavial); radiation-induced carotid stenosis; prior ispilateral radical neck dissection; prior carotid endarterectomy (restenosis), severe cardiac and pulmonary conditions. Limitations and contraindications to carotid angioplasty and stentning include: significant peripheral occlusive diseases; unfavorable aortic arch anatomy; severe tortuosity of the common and internal carotid artery; severely calcified stenosis, lesions containing fresh thrombus; stenosis longer than 2 cm; critical (>99%) stenosis; associated carotid artery aneurysm; contrast-related issues and severe aortic valve stenosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document