14583 Background: Combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has activity in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). To identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit and compare survival to that in previously described patient series, long-term survival, as a function of known and suspected prognostic variables, was determined. Methods: The survival status of 79 patients with metastatic urothelial cancer treated on two phase II trials of cisplatin and 5-FU-based regimens was updated. P-HDFL regimen (n = 35) was cisplatin 35 mg/m2 IV 24hr D1, 8; 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 and leucovorin 300 mg/m2 IV 24hr D1, 8, 15; repeated every 28 days (Cancer 2006, in press). TP-HDFL regimen (n = 44) was paclitaxel 70 mg/m2 IV 1hr D1, 8; cisplatin 35 mg/m2 IV 24hr D1, 8; 5-FU 2,000 mg/m2 and leucovorin 300 mg/m2 IV 24hr D1, 8; repeated every 21 days (Proc ASCO 22:407b, 2003 [abstr 1637]). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were constructed. Results: Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80%, presence of visceral metastasis, and alkaline phosphatase ≥220 U/l are three significant poor prognostic factors for survival. The percentage of patients who harbored zero-risk, one- or two-risk, and three-risk categories was 27%, 61%, and 13%, respectively. Among patients with no risk factors, the median survival time was not reached yet after a median follow-up of 43.0 months. Patients with one or two risk factors had a median survival duration of 12.3 months (95% CI 8.6–16.0). Patients with all three risk factors had a median survival of 4.6 months (95% CI 1.4–7.9). There was a significant difference in survival between the three groups (P < .0001). Conclusions: Previously described prognostic factors, including KPS <80%, visceral metastasis, and alkaline phosphatase ≥220 U/l, for survival in metastatic UC were confirmed in patients treated with cisplatin and 5-FU-based regimen. No significant financial relationships to disclose.