An actor-based framework for asynchronous event-based cyber-physical systems

Author(s):  
Iman Jahandideh ◽  
Fatemeh Ghassemi ◽  
Marjan Sirjani
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaoyang Cuan ◽  
Dawei Ding ◽  
Heng Wang

Abstract This paper is concerned with the event-based control problem for nonlinear cyber-physical systems (CPSs) with state constraints. A novel security control strategy consisting of a self-triggered mechanism is developed to decrease the network communication loads to the most extent on the basis of ensuring system safety and stability. The maximum capability of the designed self-triggered mechanism to resist denial-of-service (DoS) attacks occurring in controller-actuator (C-A) and sensor-controller (S-C) channels synchronously is also analyzed. In particular, we prove that the security control strategy guarantees the system safety and stability without resulting in Zeno behavior. Finally, a numerical example is provided to demonstrate the prominent effectiveness and the advantages over the existing results.


2014 ◽  
Vol 602-605 ◽  
pp. 2242-2248
Author(s):  
Hui Lin Wang

Representation model of composition event is a very important issue in the study of composition event. Aiming to solve the problem of no well reflecting the spatial-temporal characteristic of CPS (Cyber-Physical Systems) in current composition even models, a representation model of composition event based on multi-tuple is proposed for CPS in this paper. The contribution of the paper lies that we use five tuples: object, time, space, event and property, to represent a composition event of CPS, which not only can more comprehensively reflect the spatial-temporal characteristic of CPS event, but also can reflect the some dynamic change features of external environment. The simulation results show that our proposed scheme has several advantages in reducing event average error rate compared with some general event model methods.


2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ievgen Ivanov ◽  
Mykola Nikitchenko ◽  
Uri Abraham

Summary Proving properties of distributed algorithms is still a highly challenging problem and various approaches that have been proposed to tackle it [1] can be roughly divided into state-based and event-based proofs. Informally speaking, state-based approaches define the behavior of a distributed algorithm as a set of sequences of memory states during its executions, while event-based approaches treat the behaviors by means of events which are produced by the executions of an algorithm. Of course, combined approaches are also possible. Analysis of the literature [1], [7], [12], [9], [13], [14], [15] shows that state-based approaches are more widely used than event-based approaches for proving properties of algorithms, and the difficulties in the event-based approach are often emphasized. We believe, however, that there is a certain naturalness and intuitive content in event-based proofs of correctness of distributed algorithms that makes this approach worthwhile. Besides, state-based proofs of correctness of distributed algorithms are usually applicable only to discrete-time models of distributed systems and cannot be easily adapted to the continuous time case which is important in the domain of cyber-physical systems. On the other hand, event-based proofs can be readily applied to continuous-time / hybrid models of distributed systems. In the paper [2] we presented a compositional approach to reasoning about behavior of distributed systems in terms of events. Compositionality here means (informally) that semantics and properties of a program is determined by semantics of processes and process communication mechanisms. We demonstrated the proposed approach on a proof of the mutual exclusion property of the Peterson’s algorithm [11]. We have also demonstrated an application of this approach for proving the mutual exclusion property in the setting of continuous-time models of cyber-physical systems in [8]. Using Mizar [3], in this paper we give a formal proof of the mutual exclusion property of the Peterson’s algorithm in Mizar on the basis of the event-based approach proposed in [2]. Firstly, we define an event-based model of a shared-memory distributed system as a multi-sorted algebraic structure in which sorts are events, processes, locations (i.e. addresses in the shared memory), traces (of the system). The operations of this structure include a binary precedence relation ⩽ on the set of events which turns it into a linear preorder (events are considered simultaneous, if e1 ⩽ e2 and e2 ⩽ e1), special predicates which check if an event occurs in a given process or trace, predicates which check if an event causes the system to read from or write to a given memory location, and a special partial function “val of” on events which gives the value associated with a memory read or write event (i.e. a value which is written or is read in this event) [2]. Then we define several natural consistency requirements (axioms) for this structure which must hold in every distributed system, e.g. each event occurs in some process, etc. (details are given in [2]). After this we formulate and prove the main theorem about the mutual exclusion property of the Peterson’s algorithm in an arbitrary consistent algebraic structure of events. Informally, the main theorem states that if a system consists of two processes, and in some trace there occur two events e1 and e2 in different processes and each of these events is preceded by a series of three special events (in the same process) guaranteed by execution of the Peterson’s algorithm (setting the flag of the current process, writing the identifier of the opposite process to the “turn” shared variable, and reading zero from the flag of the opposite process or reading the identifier of the current process from the “turn” variable), and moreover, if neither process writes to the flag of the opposite process or writes its own identifier to the “turn” variable, then either the events e1 and e2 coincide, or they are not simultaneous (mutual exclusion property).


2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (24) ◽  
pp. 957-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Souad Bezzaoucha Rebaï ◽  
Holger Voos ◽  
Seyed Amin Sajadi Alamdari

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document