scholarly journals Cloud-Based NoSQL Open Database of Pulmonary Nodules for Computer-Aided Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Reproducible Research

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 716-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Raniery Ferreira Junior ◽  
Marcelo Costa Oliveira ◽  
Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo-Marques
2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Xinnan Xu ◽  
Hongwei Wang ◽  
Yuanli Feng ◽  
Haozhe Feng ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S515
Author(s):  
L. Pickup ◽  
C. Arteta ◽  
J. Declerck ◽  
P. Novotny ◽  
S. Antic ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. 6100-6108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Wu ◽  
Larry A. Pierce ◽  
Yuzheng Zhang ◽  
Sudhakar N. J. Pipavath ◽  
Timothy W. Randolph ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayman El-Baz ◽  
Garth M. Beache ◽  
Georgy Gimel'farb ◽  
Kenji Suzuki ◽  
Kazunori Okada ◽  
...  

This paper overviews one of the most important, interesting, and challenging problems in oncology, the problem of lung cancer diagnosis. Developing an effectivecomputer-aided diagnosis(CAD) system for lung cancer is of great clinical importance and can increase the patient’s chance of survival. For this reason, CAD systems for lung cancer have been investigated in a huge number of research studies. A typical CAD system for lung cancer diagnosis is composed of four main processing steps: segmentation of the lung fields, detection of nodules inside the lung fields, segmentation of the detected nodules, and diagnosis of the nodules as benign or malignant. This paper overviews the current state-of-the-art techniques that have been developed to implement each of these CAD processing steps. For each technique, various aspects of technical issues, implemented methodologies, training and testing databases, and validation methods, as well as achieved performances, are described. In addition, the paper addresses several challenges that researchers face in each implementation step and outlines the strengths and drawbacks of the existing approaches for lung cancer CAD systems.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zixing Wang ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Fuling Zheng ◽  
Xin Sui ◽  
Wei Han ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The timeliness of diagnostic testing after positive screening remains suboptimal because of limited evidence and methodology, leading to delayed diagnosis of lung cancer and over-examination. We propose a radiomics approach to assist with planning of the diagnostic testing interval in lung cancer screening. Methods From an institute-based lung cancer screening cohort, we retrospectively selected 92 patients with pulmonary nodules with diameters ≥ 3 mm at baseline (61 confirmed as lung cancer by histopathology; 31 confirmed cancer-free). Four groups of region-of-interest-based radiomic features (n = 310) were extracted for quantitative characterization of the nodules, and eight features were proven to be predictive of cancer diagnosis, noise-robust, phenotype-related, and non-redundant. A radiomics biomarker was then built with the random survival forest method. The patients with nodules were divided into low-, middle- and high-risk subgroups by two biomarker cutoffs that optimized time-dependent sensitivity and specificity for decisions about diagnostic workup within 3 months and about repeat screening after 12 months, respectively. A radiomics-based follow-up schedule was then proposed. Its performance was visually assessed with a time-to-diagnosis plot and benchmarked against lung RADS and four other guideline protocols. Results The radiomics biomarker had a high time-dependent area under the curve value (95% CI) for predicting lung cancer diagnosis within 12 months; training: 0.928 (0.844, 0.972), test: 0.888 (0.766, 0.975); the performance was robust in extensive cross-validations. The time-to-diagnosis distributions differed significantly between the three patient subgroups, p < 0.001: 96.2% of high-risk patients (n = 26) were diagnosed within 10 months after baseline screen, whereas 95.8% of low-risk patients (n = 24) remained cancer-free by the end of the study. Compared with the five existing protocols, the proposed follow-up schedule performed best at securing timely lung cancer diagnosis (delayed diagnosis rate: < 5%) and at sparing patients with cancer-free nodules from unnecessary repeat screenings and examinations (false recommendation rate: 0%). Conclusions Timely management of screening-detected pulmonary nodules can be substantially improved with a radiomics approach. This proof-of-concept study’s results should be further validated in large programs.


1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Suzuki ◽  
Noriko Inaoka ◽  
Hirotsugu Takabatake ◽  
Masaki Mori ◽  
Soichi Sasaoka ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shaohua Zheng ◽  
Zhiqiang Shen ◽  
Chenhao Pei ◽  
Wangbin Ding ◽  
Haojin Lin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document