Quantitative analysis of consequences to masonry buildings interacting with slow-moving landslide mechanisms: a case study

Landslides ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2017-2030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Peduto ◽  
Gianfranco Nicodemo ◽  
Marco Caraffa ◽  
Giovanni Gullà
2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1105-1112
Author(s):  
Juan WANG ◽  
Pu-Te WU ◽  
Yu-Bao WANG ◽  
Xi-Ning ZHAO ◽  
Jian-Feng SONG ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (160) ◽  
pp. 480-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amerigo Corradetti ◽  
Stefano Tavani ◽  
Mario Russo ◽  
Pau Cazo Arbués ◽  
Pablo Granado

Corpora ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Formato

This paper examines the way that the Italian media use language to refer to female ministers in the last three governments. While Italian is a gender-specific language (e.g., a root of the job titles can be followed by either feminine or masculine morphemes, singular and plural), it is common to use masculine forms to refer to and address women. Ministro is one of those cases where masculine forms replace feminine ones – a practice which could be construed as sexist, is only rarely challenged in institutions, and to which attention has only recently been paid in academia ( Fusco, 2012 ; and Robustelli, 2012a , 2012b ). The investigation presented here focusses on how grammar is translated in a way that reproduces women's invisibility in a sexist society. A corpus-based quantitative analysis of feminine and masculine forms of ministr– used in three widely read printed Italian newspapers (Corriere della Sera, Il Resto del Carlino and La Stampa) is undertaken. Newspaper articles were collected in the period 2012–14 to cover the Monti technocratic government (three female ministers), and left-winged Letta (seven female ministers) and part of the Renzi (seven female ministers) political governments. This paper contributes to the literature on language reform and sexist language in traditionally male-inhabited physical and metaphysical (stereotypes, prototypes) spaces such as the institutional public sphere.


Author(s):  
B. Altena ◽  
T. Goedemé

Photogrammetric acquisition with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) has grown extensively over the last couple of years. Such mobile platforms and their processing software have matured, resulting in a market which offers off-the-shelf mapping solutions to surveying companies and geospatial enterprises. Different approaches in platform type and optical instruments exist, though its resulting products have similar specifications. To demonstrate differences in acquisitioning practice, a case study over an open mine was flown with two different off-the-shelf UAVs (a fixed-wing and a multi-rotor). The resulting imagery is analyzed to clarify the differences in collection quality. We look at image settings, and stress the fact of photographic experience if manual setting are applied. For mapping production it might be safest to set the camera on automatic. Furthermore, we try to estimate if blur is present due to image motion. A subtle trend seems to be present, for the fast flying platform though its extent is of similar order to the slow moving one. It shows both systems operate at their limits. Finally, the lens distortion is assessed with special attention to chromatic aberration. Here we see that through calibration such aberrations could be present, however detecting this phenomena directly on imagery is not straightforward. For such effects a normal lens is sufficient, though a better lens and collimator does give significant improvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document