Climate Change in the North American Arctic: A One Health Perspective

EcoHealth ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 713-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P. Dudley ◽  
Eric P. Hoberg ◽  
Emily J. Jenkins ◽  
Alan J. Parkinson
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman S. Czarny ◽  
Magdalena Tomala ◽  
Iwona Wrońska

2019 ◽  
pp. 116-133
Author(s):  
Randy ‘Church’ Kee ◽  
Maj Gen ◽  
Paula Williams ◽  
Heather N. Nicol

2021 ◽  
pp. 39-59
Author(s):  
Heather Nicol ◽  
Andrew Chater

Author(s):  
Max Friesen

This chapter provides description and interpretation of the two major, well-documented episodes of Arctic-wide migrations. The Paleo-Inuit (also called Paleoeskimo or Arctic Small Tool tradition) migration began around 3,200 B.C., with penetration of the central Arctic by highly mobile, small-scale hunter-gatherer groups. By around 2,500 B.C., the entire eastern Arctic had been peopled by cultures known as Pre-Dorset, Saqqaq, and Independence I. The Thule Inuit migration began around A.D. 1200, when complex maritime-oriented groups from the western Arctic initiated an extremely rapid population movement, spanning the North American Arctic within a generation. The chapter considers the timing and nature of each migration episode, as well as the motivating factors which have been proposed for them, including climate change, social or economic hardship, and acquisition of specific resources such as bowhead whales or metal.


2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (17) ◽  
pp. 6707-6728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa S. Bukovsky ◽  
Carlos M. Carrillo ◽  
David J. Gochis ◽  
Dorit M. Hammerling ◽  
Rachel R. McCrary ◽  
...  

Abstract This study presents climate change results from the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) suite of dynamically downscaled simulations for the North American monsoon system in the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. The focus is on changes in precipitation and the processes driving the projected changes from the regional climate simulations and their driving coupled atmosphere–ocean global climate models. The effect of known biases on the projections is also examined. Overall, there is strong ensemble agreement for a large decrease in precipitation during the monsoon season; however, this agreement and the magnitude of the ensemble-mean change is likely deceiving, as the greatest decreases are produced by the simulations that are the most biased in the baseline/current climate. Furthermore, some of the greatest decreases in precipitation are being driven by changes in processes/phenomena that are less credible (e.g., changes in El Niño–Southern Oscillation, when it is initially not simulated well). In other simulations, the processes driving the precipitation change may be plausible, but other biases (e.g., biases in low-level moisture or precipitation intensity) appear to be affecting the magnitude of the projected changes. The most and least credible simulations are clearly identified, while the other simulations are mixed in their abilities to produce projections of value.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document