A pilot study utilizing multi-omic molecular profiling to find potential targets and select individualized treatments for patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gayle S. Jameson ◽  
Emanuel F. Petricoin ◽  
Jasgit Sachdev ◽  
Lance A. Liotta ◽  
David M. Loesch ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11123-TPS11123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gayle S. Jameson ◽  
Emanuel Petricoin ◽  
Jasgit C. Sachdev ◽  
Lance A. Liotta ◽  
David Loesch ◽  
...  

TPS11123 Background: The objective of this prospective pilot study was to determine if treatment selected by molecular profiling (MP) of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) tumors at time of disease progression provides greater clinical benefit than empiric treatment selection. Methods: Eligible pts had MBC, ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, and > 6 wks - < 6 months time to progression on last treatment prior to study entry. Fresh core biopsy samples were taken from the metastatic site for MP. Analysis by IHC, FISH, DNA microarray and reverse phase protein microarray (RPMA) a quantitative protein pathway activation mapping technique using laser capture micro dissected tumor cells was done, with results in ≤14 days reviewed by a Treatment Selection Committee. The primary objective was to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) using a MP selected treatment regimen to the preceding PFS. Clinical benefit for the pt is defined by PFS ratio (PFS on MP selected therapy/PFS on prior therapy) is ≥ 1.3, (JCO,28:4877-83:2010). N= 25 was determined (exact single-stage design for phase II studies, type I error rate of 5% [one-sided], power of 90%). MP selected therapy would warrant further investigation if ≥ 35% of the pts demonstrate a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3. Results: Three U.S. sites enrolled 25 evaluable pts who were treated based on MP results. Pts were heavily pretreated with 4 -11 prior therapies (median 7.24). Ten pts (40%) met or exceeded the PFS ratio of 1.3. The most common targets used in drug treatment selection were TOPO1, TS, ER/PR, TOP2A, HER2. Sixty percent of pts’ samples had activation of drug targets determined by RPMA in 3 major clusters: pan-HER-AKT; EGFR/SRC/ERK/mTOR; IGFR/RAF/MEK/PLK1. Days on MP selected treatments range from 9 - 816+. 3 pts continue on treatment for 199, 254 and 816 days. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a highly multiplexed genomic and proteomic MP study for treatment selection in a timely fashion. Patient-specific target driven treatment selection based on MP of a metastatic lesion provided clinical benefit for 10 of 25 heavily pretreated MBC pts. Thus, this approach merits further investigation in future studies. Funded by The Side-Out Foundation. Clinical trial information: NCT01074814.


2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
Brigitte Maximiliana Aarts ◽  
Elisabeth Geneviève Klompenhouwer ◽  
Raphaëla Carmen Dresen ◽  
Christophe Michel Albert Louis Omer Deroose ◽  
Regina Gien Hoa Beets-Tan ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundThe aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of intra-arterial mitomycin C (MMC) infusion after selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) using Yttrium-90 (90Y) resin microspheres in liver metastatic breast cancer (LMBC) patients.Patients and methodsThe prospective pilot study included LMBC patients from 2012–2018. Patients first received infusion of 90Y resin microspheres, after 6–8 weeks response to treatment was assessed by MRI, 18F-FDG PET/CT and laboratory tests. After exclusion of progressive disease, MMC infusion was administrated 8 weeks later in different dose cohorts; A: 6 mg in 1 cycle, B: 12 mg in 2 cycles, C: 24 mg in 2 cycles and D: maximum of 72 mg in 6 cycles. In cohort D the response was evaluated after every 2 cycles and continued after exclusion of progressive disease. Adverse events (AE) were reported according to CTCAE version 5.0.ResultsSixteen patients received 90Y treatment. Four patients were excluded for MMC infusion, because of extra hepatic disease progression (n = 3) and clinical and biochemical instability (n = 1). That resulted in the following number of patient per cohort; A: 2, B: 1, C: 3 and D: 6. In 4 of the 12 patients (all cohort D) the maximum dose of MMC was adjusted due biochemical toxicities (n = 2) and progressive disease (n = 2). One grade 3 AE occurred after 90Y treatment consisting of a gastrointestinal ulcer whereby prolonged hospitalization was needed.ConclusionsSequential treatment of intra-arterial infusion of MMC after 90Y SIRT was feasible in 75% of the patients when MMC was administrated in different escalating dose cohorts. However, caution is needed to prevent reflux after 90Y SIRT in LMBC patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (18) ◽  
pp. 5358-5365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne F. Schott ◽  
Lori J. Goldstein ◽  
Massimo Cristofanilli ◽  
Pier Adelchi Ruffini ◽  
Susan McCanna ◽  
...  

Breast Care ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-233
Author(s):  
Michael Braun ◽  
Bettina Schlehe ◽  
Andree Faridi ◽  
Uwe Heindrichs ◽  
Christian Rudlowski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document