Molecular Profiling in Young (<50 Years of Age) Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Author(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11123-TPS11123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gayle S. Jameson ◽  
Emanuel Petricoin ◽  
Jasgit C. Sachdev ◽  
Lance A. Liotta ◽  
David Loesch ◽  
...  

TPS11123 Background: The objective of this prospective pilot study was to determine if treatment selected by molecular profiling (MP) of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) tumors at time of disease progression provides greater clinical benefit than empiric treatment selection. Methods: Eligible pts had MBC, ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, and > 6 wks - < 6 months time to progression on last treatment prior to study entry. Fresh core biopsy samples were taken from the metastatic site for MP. Analysis by IHC, FISH, DNA microarray and reverse phase protein microarray (RPMA) a quantitative protein pathway activation mapping technique using laser capture micro dissected tumor cells was done, with results in ≤14 days reviewed by a Treatment Selection Committee. The primary objective was to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) using a MP selected treatment regimen to the preceding PFS. Clinical benefit for the pt is defined by PFS ratio (PFS on MP selected therapy/PFS on prior therapy) is ≥ 1.3, (JCO,28:4877-83:2010). N= 25 was determined (exact single-stage design for phase II studies, type I error rate of 5% [one-sided], power of 90%). MP selected therapy would warrant further investigation if ≥ 35% of the pts demonstrate a PFS ratio of ≥ 1.3. Results: Three U.S. sites enrolled 25 evaluable pts who were treated based on MP results. Pts were heavily pretreated with 4 -11 prior therapies (median 7.24). Ten pts (40%) met or exceeded the PFS ratio of 1.3. The most common targets used in drug treatment selection were TOPO1, TS, ER/PR, TOP2A, HER2. Sixty percent of pts’ samples had activation of drug targets determined by RPMA in 3 major clusters: pan-HER-AKT; EGFR/SRC/ERK/mTOR; IGFR/RAF/MEK/PLK1. Days on MP selected treatments range from 9 - 816+. 3 pts continue on treatment for 199, 254 and 816 days. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a highly multiplexed genomic and proteomic MP study for treatment selection in a timely fashion. Patient-specific target driven treatment selection based on MP of a metastatic lesion provided clinical benefit for 10 of 25 heavily pretreated MBC pts. Thus, this approach merits further investigation in future studies. Funded by The Side-Out Foundation. Clinical trial information: NCT01074814.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11028-11028
Author(s):  
Victoria Forte ◽  
Weizhu Zhu ◽  
Dany Barrak ◽  
Alexander Ring ◽  
Vasu Punj ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 61-61
Author(s):  
R. Ashfaq ◽  
E. Fong

61 Background: The diagnosis of malignant effusion signifies disease progression and is associated with a worse prognosis regardless of tumor origin. The cancer cells in fluids have unique genotypic and phenotypic characteristics that are uniquely different from the primary tumor. Therapeutic guidance should be based on the evaluation of tumor cells in effusions. This study reports the feasibility of molecular profiling for breast cancer metastasis in pleural and peritoneal fluids. Methods: A computer search was conducted to retrospectively identify malignant fluid samples or cell blocks for molecular profiling. A cell-block was either prepared or available for testing for all samples. An H&E slide was prepared from the cell- block and reviewed by a pathologist before any testing. Malignant cell percentages were determined for purpose of DNA microarray analysis and Sequencing. Appropriate clusters and malignant cells were marked for FISH. The results were reviewed and data compiled to calculate the yield of various molecular predictive tests. Results: We studied 172 fluid of which 28 were metastatic breast cancer (16.2%). Of the 28 breast cases, 10 IHC biomarkers could be performed in 20 (71.4 %), 1-9 in 1 (3.5 %), while 7 (25%) were insufficient. DNA microarray analysis was done in 10 (35.7%), FISH for EGFR 7 (25%), Her2 Neu FISH 11(39%), cMYC FISH 5 (17.8%) and TOPO2a by FISH 3 (10.7%). Combined IHC/FISH/MA data was available in 10, IHC and FISH data in 11 and IHC and MA data in 10 cases. Combined results of predictive markers provided information on therapeutic guidance in 21 of 28 cases. Conclusion: Molecular profiling of malignant fluids offers additional opportunities for testing those patients where other tissue samples such as needle core biopsy or resection samples are not available. Molecular profiling provides insight into the molecular characteristics of malignant cells in body cavity fluids and associated expression of unique therapeutic targets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document