Assessing an efficient hybrid of Monte Carlo technique (GSA-GLUE) in Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of vanGenuchten Soil Moisture Characteristics Curve

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samaneh Etminan ◽  
Vahidreza Jalali ◽  
Majid Mahmoodabadi ◽  
Abbas Khashei siuki ◽  
Mohsen Pourreza Bilondi
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Monte Carlo Technique ◽  
Uncertainty And Sensitivity Analysis

scholarly journals Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of control strategies using the benchmark simulation model No1 (BSM1)

2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Flores-Alsina ◽  
Ignasi Rodriguez-Roda ◽  
Gürkan Sin ◽  
Krist V. Gernaey
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Carbon Source ◽  
Simulation Model ◽  
Correction Factor ◽  
Control Strategies ◽  
Hydrolysis Rate ◽  
External Carbon Source ◽  
Uncertainty And Sensitivity Analysis

The objective of this paper is to perform an uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the predictions of the Benchmark Simulation Model (BSM) No. 1, when comparing four activated sludge control strategies. The Monte Carlo simulation technique is used to evaluate the uncertainty in the BSM1 predictions, considering the ASM1 bio-kinetic parameters and influent fractions as input uncertainties while the Effluent Quality Index (EQI) and the Operating Cost Index (OCI) are focused on as model outputs. The resulting Monte Carlo simulations are presented using descriptive statistics indicating the degree of uncertainty in the predicted EQI and OCI. Next, the Standard Regression Coefficients (SRC) method is used for sensitivity analysis to identify which input parameters influence the uncertainty in the EQI predictions the most. The results show that control strategies including an ammonium (SNH) controller reduce uncertainty in both overall pollution removal and effluent total Kjeldahl nitrogen. Also, control strategies with an external carbon source reduce the effluent nitrate (SNO) uncertainty increasing both their economical cost and variability as a trade-off. Finally, the maximum specific autotrophic growth rate (μA) causes most of the variance in the effluent for all the evaluated control strategies. The influence of denitrification related parameters, e.g. ηg (anoxic growth rate correction factor) and ηh (anoxic hydrolysis rate correction factor), becomes less important when a SNO controller manipulating an external carbon source addition is implemented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document