High-Dose Infliximab Rescue Therapy for Hospitalized Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Does Not Improve Colectomy-Free Survival

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 518-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Che-Yung Chao ◽  
Alex Al Khoury ◽  
Achuthan Aruljothy ◽  
Sophie Restellini ◽  
Jonathan Wyse ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1169-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew C Choy ◽  
Dean Seah ◽  
David M Faleck ◽  
Shailja C Shah ◽  
Che-Yung Chao ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundInfliximab is an effective salvage therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis; however, the optimal dosing strategy is unknown. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the impact of infliximab dosage and intensification on colectomy-free survival in acute severe ulcerative colitis.MethodsStudies reporting outcomes of hospitalized steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab salvage were identified. Infliximab use was categorized by dose, dose number, and schedule. The primary outcome was colectomy-free survival at 3 months. Pooled proportions and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were reported.ResultsForty-one cohorts (n = 2158 cases) were included. Overall colectomy-free survival with infliximab salvage was 79.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.48% to 83.6%) at 3 months and 69.8% (95% CI, 65.7% to 73.7%) at 12 months. Colectomy-free survival at 3 months was superior with 5-mg/kg multiple (≥2) doses compared with single-dose induction (odds ratio [OR], 4.24; 95% CI, 2.44 to 7.36; P < 0.001). However, dose intensification with either high-dose or accelerated strategies was not significantly different to 5-mg/kg standard induction at 3 months (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.27; P = 0.24) despite being utilized in patients with a significantly higher mean C-reactive protein and lower albumin levels.ConclusionsIn acute severe ulcerative colitis, multiple 5-mg/kg infliximab doses are superior to single-dose salvage. Dose-intensified induction outcomes were not significantly different compared to standard induction and were more often used in patients with increased disease severity, which may have confounded the results. This meta-analysis highlights the marked variability in the management of infliximab salvage therapy and the need for further studies to determine the optimal dose strategy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S447-S447
Author(s):  
C D Jiang ◽  
T Thalagala ◽  
D Rosembert ◽  
M Parkes ◽  
J Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Parenteral ciclosporin (CsA) is an effective rescue therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) and has similar efficacy to infliximab (IFX). Although CsA is cheaper and can facilitate bridging to any IBD therapy, including newer biologics, its use is limited by variable pharmacokinetics and possibility of significant systemic toxicity particularly associated with the intravenous preparation. Despite favourable pharmacokinetics and bioavailability, the use of lipid-emulsified oral CsA in steroid-refractory ASUC is undefined. Methods All patients who received oral CsA (Neoral®) rescue therapy for ASUC at Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK from Nov 2014 to May 2020 were identified from electronic healthcare records. Baseline data and outcomes were extracted and compared to patients who received IFX rescue therapy. Statistical significance was assessed using non-parametric tests. Survival estimates were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results A total of 37 patients received oral CsA for refractory ASUC. Median time from admission to CsA initiation was 5 days (IQR 4–6 d) and median initial dose was 8 mg/kg/d (IQR 7–8 mg/kg/d). At admission, the median CRP was 26 (IQR 14–95) and Truelove and Witt’s severity criteria met in 21/37 (57%). 70% of patients (26/37) avoided colectomy during the index admission. No parameters were demonstrated to predict need for acute colectomy. Median follow-up after hospital discharge was 3 years (IQR 2-5years). For those who avoided acute colectomy, median duration of therapy was 4 months (IQR 2.5-5months) with bridging to azathioprine (24/26, 92%), vedolizumab (1/26, 4%), or 5-ASA (1/26, 4%). Estimated colectomy-free survival in responders were 84%, 84% and 78% at 12, 24, and 60 months. No parameters were shown to predict colectomy-free survival. Comparable colectomy-free outcomes were obtained for contemporaneous IFX-treated ASUC patients in our hospital. 9 of 26 patients remained biologic-naïve and colectomy-free after a median of 3 years. Estimated colectomy and biologic-free survival were 51%, 47% and 18% at 12, 24, and 60 months. 15 patients experienced adverse events, which were all mild and self-limiting. There were 3 infective complications. No patients required drug cessation and no serious adverse events associated with parenteral CsA occurred. Conclusion In this cohort, oral CsA was a safe, well tolerated and effective rescue therapy for steroid-refractory ASUC. A proportion of patients remain biologic and colectomy-free for up to 5 years. Given the feasibility to bridge to effective maintenance therapies, including newer biologics, oral CsA should be considered as a rescue therapy in ASUC and avoids many of the side effects associated with intravenous CsA.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S373-S374
Author(s):  
A Barnes ◽  
P Spizzo

Abstract Background Steroid exposure has been associated with poorer outcomes following colectomy in acute severe ulcerative colitis. Current treatment algorithms suggest three days of high dose intravenous steroid before the decision to commence rescue therapy. We aimed to look at medium-term outcomes in acute severe ulcerative colitis and their predictors including steroid exposure prior to admission. Methods A retrospective case note and electronic record review were conducted at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease referral centre of admissions for acute severe ulcerative colitis meeting Truelove and Witts criteria from 2013 to 2019. Identified admissions were categorised as: not on steroid prior to admission or on steroid for less than one week prior to admission, on steroid for over one week prior to admission, and on steroid for over one month prior to admission. Data were analysed using Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Results In total, 109 admissions were identified for acute severe ulcerative colitis meeting Truelove and Witts criteria over 2013 to 2019. Rescue therapy was significantly more likely in patients with over one week of steroid exposure prior to admission (76.0% vs. 28.5%, p = 0.0001). Prior steroid exposure was not associated with failure of medical rescue therapy (p = 0.42). Patients with steroid exposure for at least one week prior to admission trended towards increased likelihood to undergo colectomy during admission (32.0% vs. 16.6%, p = 0.0.09) and were significantly more likely to undergo colectomy within one year of admission (44.0% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.028). Excluding patients with a first presentation of inflammatory bowel disease showed that patients with steroid exposure for at least one week prior to admission trended towards significance to undergo colectomy during admission (32.0% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.05) and were significantly more likely to undergo colectomy within one year of admission (44.0% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.036). Readmissions within one year of acute severe ulcerative colitis admission were not significantly different (40.0% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.33). Conclusion Prolonged steroid exposure prior to admission was associated with an increased likelihood of rescue therapy but was not predictive of response to medical rescue therapy. Colectomy rates at one year were significantly higher with over one week of steroid exposure prior to admission. Consideration should be given to early commencement of rescue therapy in those with prolonged steroid exposure prior to admission.


2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Al Khoury ◽  
Che-yung Chao ◽  
Talat Bessissow ◽  
Jonathan Wyse ◽  
Achuthan Aruljothy

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S330-S331 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Al Khoury ◽  
C.-y. Chao ◽  
A. Aruljothy ◽  
J. Wyse ◽  
T. Bessissow

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 1026-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant Kotwani ◽  
Jonathan Terdiman ◽  
Sara Lewin

Abstract Background Acute severe ulcerative colitis is a high stakes event with significant numbers still requiring emergent colectomy, representing a need to establish alternative medical management options. We report a case series of tofacitinib as rescue therapy in biologic-experienced patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. Methods Four patients were identified over a 1-year period at our institution who initiated tofacitinib for acute severe ulcerative colitis. All four had previously failed at least two biologics, including infliximab, and were failing high-dose oral prednisone therapy before admission. All patients had Mayo disease activity index of at least 10 at admission. After no significant improvement despite receiving a minimum of 3 days of intravenous methylprednisolone and based on elevated Ho and Travis indices at Day 3, patients were offered rescue tofacitinib for induction of remission, or colectomy. Standard induction of tofacitinib was used [10 mg twice daily], and one patient was escalated to 15 mg twice daily after inadequate response. Results All patients experienced improvement in objective symptoms and laboratory markers, and were discharged without colectomy on tofacitinib as maintenance therapy and prednisone taper; 30-day and 90-day colectomy rates on tofacitinib maintenance therapy were zero and 90-day readmission rate was also zero. Two of four patients achieved steroid-free remission on maintenance tofacitinib monotherapy based on clinical symptoms and follow-up endoscopy. No major adverse reaction was reported during induction or maintenance therapy. Conclusions Tofacitinib may be an acceptable rescue agent in biologic-experienced patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. Tofacitinib may also be safely continued as maintenance therapy once remission has been achieved.


Author(s):  
Konstantina Rosiou ◽  
Christian Philipp Selinger

AbstractAcute severe ulcerative colitis is a medical emergency that warrants in-patient management. This is best served within a multidisciplinary team setting in specialised centres or with expert consultation. Intravenous corticosteroids remain the cornerstone in the management of ASUC and should be initiated promptly, along with general management measures and close monitoring of patients. Unfortunately, one-third of patients will fail to respond to steroids. Response to intravenous corticosteroid therapy needs to be assessed on the third day and rescue therapies, including cyclosporine and infliximab, should be offered to patients not responding. Choice of rescue therapy depends on experience, drug availability and factors associated with each individual patient, such as comorbidities, previous medications or contra-indications to therapy. Patients who have not responded within 7 days to rescue therapy must be considered for surgery. Surgery is a treatment option in ASUC and should not be delayed in cases of failure of medical therapy, because such delays increase surgical morbidity and mortality. This review summarises the current management of acute severe ulcerative colitis and discusses potential future developments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document