scholarly journals A first-in-human, phase 1 study of the NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 inhibitor TAS4464 in patients with advanced solid tumors

Author(s):  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Kan Yonemori ◽  
Shigehisa Kitano ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  

SummaryBackground This open-label, phase 1 study investigated TAS4464, a potent NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (JapicCTI-173,488; registered 13/01/2017). The primary objective was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was investigated using an accelerated titration design. Methods The starting 10-mg/m2 dose was followed by an initial accelerated stage (weekly dosing; n = 11). Based on liver function test (LFT) results, a 14-day, 20-mg/m2 dose lead-in period was implemented (weekly dosing with lead-in; n = 6). Results Abnormal LFT changes and gastrointestinal effects were the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs). DLTs with 56-mg/m2 weekly dosing occurred in 1/5 patients; five patients had grade ≥ 2 abnormal LFT changes at 40- and 56-mg/m2 weekly doses. Further dose escalation ceased because of the possibility of severe abnormal LFT changes occurring. DLTs with weekly dosing with lead-in occurred in 1/5 patients at a 56-mg/m2 dose; MTD could not be determined because discontinuation criteria for additional enrollment at that particular dose level were met. As no further enrollment at lower doses occurred, dose escalation assessment was discontinued. Serious treatment-related AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and DLTs were all related to abnormal LFT changes, suggesting that TAS4464 administration could affect liver function. This effect was dose-dependent but considered reversible. Complete or partial responses to TAS4464 were not observed; one patient achieved prolonged stable disease. Conclusions MTD could not be determined due to TAS4464 effects on liver function. Further evaluation of the mechanism of NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor-induced abnormal liver function is required. Trial registration number JapicCTI-173,488 (registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center). Registration date 13 January 2017

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS258-TPS258
Author(s):  
Zev A. Wainberg ◽  
Monica M. Mita ◽  
Minal A. Barve ◽  
Erika P. Hamilton ◽  
Andrew J. Brenner ◽  
...  

TPS258 Background: Engineered toxin bodies (ETBs) are comprised of a proprietarily engineered form of Shiga-like Toxin A subunit genetically fused to antibody-like binding domains. ETBs work through novel mechanisms of action & are capable of forcing internalization, self-routing through intracellular compartments to the cytosol & inducing potent cell-kill via the enzymatic & permanent inactivation of ribosomes. MT-5111 is a de-immunized ETB targeting HER2+ solid tumors. Its novel mechanism of action, via enzymatic ribosome inactivation, may not be subject to resistance mechanisms that exist for tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, or antibody modalities. MT-5111 binds an epitope on HER2, distinct from trastuzumab or pertuzumab, that may provide for combination potential with other HER2-targeting agents. MT-5111 is a 55 kilodalton protein & may have improved tumor penetration capability. The objective of this trial will be to determine the safety, tolerability, & maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MT-5111 in patients (pts) with advanced HER2+ solid tumors. Methods: This Phase 1, first-in-human, open-label, dose escalation & expansion study will evaluate MT-5111 monotherapy in pts with HER2-positive solid tumors. The primary objective is to determine the MTD; secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics, tumor response & immunogenicity. Part 1 consists of MT-5111 dose escalation (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.5, 6.75, 10µg/kg/dose) based on a modified 3+3 design (n≤42 pts); Part 2 (dose expansion) will evaluate MT-5111 at the MTD in ≤98 pts. All pts will be administered MT-5111 over 30 min via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, & 15 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, withdrawal of consent, or another reason for withdrawal. Part 1 will include pts with any HER2+ solid cancers. Part 2 will enroll 3 expansion cohorts: HER2+ breast (BC), HER2+ gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas (collectively referred as gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas [GEA]) & other HER2+ solid cancers. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) status must be 2+ or 3+, regardless of in situ hybridization (ISH) results; if no IHC is available for pts with BC or GEA, ISH criteria per the American Society of Clinical Oncology College of American Pathologists guidelines will be used. In metastatic cases, HER2 positivity must be demonstrated on metastatic lesions. Pts with HER2+ BC should have had ≥2 lines of HER2-directed therapy; pts with HER2+ GEA should have received or been intolerant to trastuzumab. Pts with evaluable disease may be included in Part 1; in Part 2, all pts must have ≥1 measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Further details can be found on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04029922). Enrollment, which began in September 2019, is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04029922.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3069-3069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret K. Callahan ◽  
Kunle Odunsi ◽  
Mario Sznol ◽  
John J. Nemunaitis ◽  
Patrick Alexander Ott ◽  
...  

3069 Background: DUR is a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) that blocks PD-L1. TRE is a human IgG2 mAb inhibitor of CTLA-4. Blocking these checkpoints can result in antitumor activity in some solid tumors. The targets for DUR and TRE are non-redundant, providing sound rationale for clinical testing of the combination. Methods: This is an ongoing Phase 1, multicenter, open label study (NCT01975831) with a dose escalation (3+3 design) and subsequent expansion phase. Patients (pts) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), cervical (CC), colorectal (CRC), non-triple-negative breast (NTNBC), ovarian (OC), non-small cell lung, or head and neck cancer are eligible. Primary endpoints are safety/tolerability and identification of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. Secondary objectives include tumor response and progression-free/overall survival. Results: As of 16 Dec 2016, 105 pts were treated. DUR 1500 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) and TRE 75 mg Q4W X 4 was the regimen used for opening the expansion phase. Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 4 pts: diarrhea, colitis, abnormal liver function tests (abn LFTs), and hyponatremia. The majority of treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were Grades (Gr) 1 and 2. TRAEs ≥ Gr 3 were reported in 12 pts; the majority were diarrhea/colitis (n = 5) and abn LFTs (n = 4) and responded to established treatment algorithms. There was 1 Gr 5 TRAE: multi organ failure. No new toxicities were identified. The preliminary responses by tumor type with n ≥ 10 pts are shown in the table below. Responses were seen in OC and RCC at the Cohort 2 dose escalation level (DUR 1/TRE 3 mg/kg). There were 4 cases of SD > 24 weeks: CC, n=2; CRC, n=1; OC, n=1. PD-L1 status was not tested. Conclusions: The DUR + TRE combination has a manageable safety profile, with preliminary evidence of clinical activity. These data support continued study of the combination therapy; the study is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01975831. [Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9509-9509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
Karen A. Autio ◽  
Talia Golan ◽  
Konstantin Dobrenkov ◽  
Elliot Chartash ◽  
...  

9509 Background: Ligation of GITR on immune cells decreases Treg-mediated suppression and enhances T cell proliferation. MK-4166 is a humanized IgG1 agonist monoclonal antibody targeting GITR. Data from the first-in-human phase 1 study (NCT02132754) of MK-4166 as monotherapy (mono) or in combination with pembro (combo) are presented. Methods: MK-4166 was tested alone (0.0015 mg IV-900 mg Q3W ×4 doses) or with pembro (fixed dose 200 mg IV Q3W up to 35 doses) in the absence of toxicity or progression. Study included a dose escalation/confirmation cohort (metastatic solid tumors) and an expansion cohort (treatment-naive and pretreated melanoma). A T cell–inflamed gene expression profile (GEP) was assessed using RNA from baseline tumor samples. End points – primary: safety/tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of MK-4166; secondary: pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD); exploratory: objective response rate (ORR) per irRECIST1.1. Results: Of 113 pts, 48 received mono and 65 combo; 20 were in the melanoma expansion. Common AEs ( > 20%) were fatigue, infusion-related reaction, nausea, abdominal pain, and pruritus; 43 pts had grade ≥3 AEs (38.1%); 6 (5.3%) were treatment-related. One dose-limiting toxicity (bladder perforation in a urothelial pt with a neobladder) possibly related to study drug was observed with mono. MTD was not reached. No treatment-related deaths were observed. MK-4166 PK/PD showed target-mediated drug disposition concomitant with decreased GITR availability on T cells in blood with increasing doses. Four objective responses (4/45; ORR, 9%) were seen with combo in dose escalation. For ICI-naive melanoma pts (n = 13) in expansion, ORR was 69% (95% CI, 38-91), including 4 CRs and 5 PRs. No response was observed in 7 pts previously treated with ICI. High ORRs were observed in noninflamed and inflamed ICI-naive melanoma pts. Conclusions: MK-4166 at a dose up to 900 mg as monotherapy and in combination with pembro was well tolerated, with dose-related evidence of target engagement. Responses were observed with MK-4166 900 mg plus pembro, particularly in pts with melanoma naive to ICIs. Clinical trial information: NCT02132754.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuo Cao ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundPreclinical studies have supported a potential synergistic antitumor activity between surufatinib and anti-programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). We describe here the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with surufatinib combined with toripalimab, an inhibitor of PD-L1.MethodsThis is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose escalation stage, 3 cohorts of patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with a fixed dose of toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to evaluate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion phase to further assess the efficacy, safety, and PK profile.ResultsFrom April 1, 2019 to July 10, 2020, 31 patients were screened, of which 28 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity (DLT), a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The top 3 most common treatment-related adverse events of ≥ grade 3 were transaminases increased (17.9%), hypertension (14.3%) and blood bilirubin increased (10.7%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Overall objective response rate was 22.2% [95% confidential interval (CI) 8.6‒42.3], and disease control rate reached 81.5% (95% CI 61.9‒93.7). ConclusionsSurufatinib plus toripalimab was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879057; Registered March 18, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879057


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7067-TPS7067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naval Guastad Daver ◽  
Weiguo Zhang ◽  
Richard Graydon ◽  
Vikas Dawra ◽  
Jingdong Xie ◽  
...  

TPS7067 Background: Fms -like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication ( FLT3-ITD) mutations occur in ≈ 25% of pts with AML and are associated with poor prognosis. Quizartinib is a highly potent, selective, next-generation type II FLT3 inhibitor. In the phase 3 QuANTUM-R trial, quizartinib prolonged overall survival vs salvage chemotherapy in pts with R/R FLT3-ITD AML. MDM2 downregulates the p53 tumor suppressor and is upregulated in pts with AML. Targeting MDM2 may restore p53 activity in pts with wild-type p53 AML. Milademetan, a novel and specific MDM2 inhibitor, showed activity in an ongoing phase 1 trial in pts with AML or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Preclinical studies have shown that quizartinib plus milademetan may act synergistically to target FLT3-ITD and restore p53 activity in FLT3-ITD/ TP53 wild-type AML [Andreeff et al. ASH 2018, abstract 2720]. Methods: This open-label phase 1 study (NCT03552029) has 2 parts: dose escalation (part 1) followed by dose expansion (part 2), with 2 planned cohorts. Key inclusion criteria include FLT3-ITD AML (primary or secondary to MDS) and adequate renal, hepatic, and clotting functions. Key exclusion criteria include acute promyelocytic leukemia, prior treatment with a MDM2 inhibitor, QTcF interval > 450 ms, significant cardiovascular disease, and unresolved toxicities from prior therapies. Dose escalation and expansion cohort 1 includes R/R pts. Expansion cohort 2 includes ND pts unfit for intensive chemotherapy. During dose escalation, quizartinib will be administered once daily in 28-day cycles, with 3 proposed levels (30, 40, and 60 mg). Milademetan will be administered on days 1-14 of each 28-day cycle, with 3 proposed levels (90, 120, and 160 mg). The quizartinib dose will be escalated first, followed by the milademetan dose with no simultaneous escalation, guided by modified continual reassessment with overdose control. Primary objectives are safety and tolerability, optimum dosing schedule, maximum tolerated dose, recommended dosing for the expansion cohort, and phase 2 dosing. Secondary objectives are pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy. This study is recruiting. Clinical trial information: NCT03552029.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2654-TPS2654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew David Hellmann ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Toshihiko Doi ◽  
F. Stephen Hodi ◽  
Sylvie Rottey ◽  
...  

TPS2654 Background: Programmed cell death 1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1) have demonstrated clinical benefit in a subset of patients with manageable safety across a variety of tumor types. T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain-containing molecule-3 (TIM-3) can be co-expressed with PD-1 on exhausted T-cells and may be upregulated in tumors refractory to anti-PD-1 therapy (Koyama et al. 2016). Pre-clinical studies demonstrated that blockade of both PD-1 and TIM-3 improved survival of tumor-bearing mice compared to blocking anti-PD-1 only (Koyama et al. 2016). LY3415244 is a TIM-3/PD-L1 bispecific antibody that has the ability to target and inhibit both TIM-3 and PD-L1 and the potential to overcome primary and acquired anti-PD-(L)1 resistance by a novel mechanism to bridge TIM-3- and PD-L1-expressing cells. Methods: Study JZDA is a multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, Phase 1a/1b study of LY3415244 in patients with advanced solid tumors. In Phase 1a, subjects with any tumor type who are either PD-(L)1 inhibitor-naïve or exposed are eligible. In Phase 1b, expansion cohorts are planned in subjects with PD-(L)1-experienced NSCLC, urothelial carcinoma, and melanoma. Patients with malignant mesothelioma are not required to have received prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. The primary objective is to assess safety and tolerability of LY3415244 and identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) in Phase 1a (dose escalation). Safety and tolerability of the RP2D will be assessed in Phase 1b (dose expansion). The secondary objectives are to assess the pharmacokinetics of LY3415244 in Phase 1a/1b and assess early antitumor activity of LY3415244 in Phase 1b cohorts. Pre- and on-treatment biopsies will be obtained to explore potential biomarkers of response. During Phase 1a, dose escalation cohorts will proceed via a modified toxicity probability interval-2 (mTPI-2) design with a 1-cycle (28-day) dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) observation period. LY3415244 will be dosed intravenously every 2 weeks. Data from Phase 1a will determine the RP2D, which will be used for all cohorts in Phase 1b. The study is currently open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT03752177.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3073-3073
Author(s):  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Victoria S. Chua-Alcala ◽  
Jasgit C. Sachdev ◽  
David S. Wages ◽  
David D. Stenehjem ◽  
...  

3073 Background: Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is an epigenetic enzyme that is aberrantly expressed in many solid tumors. High levels of LSD1 expression are often correlated with poor patient prognosis due to LSD1’s role in cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and chemoresistance. Seclidemstat is a novel, selective, reversible and oral LSD1 inhibitor capable of inhibiting both LSD1’s catalytic and scaffolding functions. We report preliminary efficacy in AST from an ongoing phase 1 trial. Methods: SALA-003-AC19 (NCT03895684) is a phase 1 trial of single agent SP-2577 in pts with AST. All pts had progressive disease (PD) at time of study entry. Pts received oral SP-2577 twice a day under fasting condition, in 28-day cycles (C). The primary objective is safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives are to determine maximum-tolerated dose, preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Results: As of December 30, 2020, 19 pts with AST (10 sarcoma, 2 prostate, 2 ovarian, 2 pancreatic, 1 renal, 1 cervical, 1 breast) were enrolled. Pts received escalating doses of SP-2577 from 150 to 600 mg BID and the dose escalation is ongoing. The median age was 63 years (range, 21–79). 42% were male, and pts had received a median of 4 (range, 1–8) prior systemic therapies. The most common (>5%) grade 3 treatment-related adverse events were GI related including diarrhea (5.3%) and abdominal pain (5.3%). No grade 4 events were reported and there were no treatment-related deaths. Safety data will be presented after completion of phase 1. Three pts had at least one dose reduction. Among the 13 pts who were evaluable for response at end of C2, 7 pts (54%) had best response of stable disease (SD) with median time to progression (TTP) of 4.3 months (range, 2.1–11.5). Four of the 7 pts had genetic abnormalities that may demonstrate increased sensitization to SP-2577 according to preclinical studies. Characteristics of 7 pts with SD at C2 and beyond are shown in the table. Conclusions: Seclidemstat has shown activity among advanced sarcoma pts with a manageable safety profile. The dose escalation is ongoing and preliminary clinical data supports further exploration in FET-translocated sarcoma as single agent and in combination therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03895684. [Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1477-1486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajime Asahina ◽  
Yosuke Tamura ◽  
Hiroshi Nokihara ◽  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Yoshitaka Seki ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A315-A315
Author(s):  
Bhumsuk Keam ◽  
Tae Min Kim ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Chan-Young Ock ◽  
Won Ki Kang ◽  
...  

BackgroundIMC-001 is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to human PD-L1 and mediate the antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of IMC-001 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Here, we report final result of the phase 1 study of IMC-001.MethodsThis open-labeled phase 1 study used standard 3+3 dose-escalation design, dose ranging from 2 to 20 mg. IMC-001 was administered intravenously every two weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) window was defined as 21 days from the first dose. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using CTCAE v4.03, and tumor response was assessed by and the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version v1.1.ResultsFifteen subjects (8 Male, 7 Female; Median age : 58 [range 39–69]) were included in 5 dose escalation cohorts. No DLT was observed and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Most common AEs were general weakness, decreased appetite, fever, and cough. No Grade 4 or 5 treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported during the study and no TEAE or serious AE led to treatment discontinuation or death. There were no infusion-related reactions during this study. Grade 2 immune-induced thyroiditis and diabetes mellitus suspected to be related to IMC-001 were seen in one subject at 2 mg/kg cohort. Over the dose range of 2 to 20 mg/kg IMC-001, AUC 0-14d, AUC 0—∞, and Cmax generally appeared to increase in a dose proportional manner for each step of dose escalation. Of the 15 enrolled patients, one subject with colon cancer showed partial response, and disease control rate was 33.3%. There were total 3 biliary tract cancer patients (1 GB cancer, 2 Cholangiocarcinoma) who received ≥3 lines of systemic therapies prior to this trial. They all had stable disease during IMC-001 treatment, and one cholangiocarcinoma subject received the treatment for 434 days.ConclusionsIMC-001 demonstrated a favorable safety profile up to 20 mg/kg given IV every 2 weeks and showed encouraging preliminary efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Based on PK and PD data, 20 mg/kg was selected as recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D).Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by Institutional Review Board; approval number SMC 2018-01-007-001 and H-1801-042-913.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document