scholarly journals Will biomarker-based diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease maximize scientific progress? Evaluating proposed diagnostic criteria

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 607-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Medellena Maria Glymour ◽  
Adam Mark Brickman ◽  
Mika Kivimaki ◽  
Elizabeth Rose Mayeda ◽  
Geneviève Chêne ◽  
...  
Neurology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (23) ◽  
pp. 2381-2391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roderick A. Corriveau ◽  
Walter J. Koroshetz ◽  
Jordan T. Gladman ◽  
Sophia Jeon ◽  
Debra Babcock ◽  
...  

Goal 1 of the National Plan to Address Alzheimer’s Disease is to prevent and effectively treat Alzheimer disease and Alzheimer disease–related dementias by 2025. To help inform the research agenda toward achieving this goal, the NIH hosts periodic summits that set and refine relevant research priorities for the subsequent 5 to 10 years. This proceedings article summarizes the 2016 Alzheimer's Disease–Related Dementias Summit, including discussion of scientific progress, challenges, and opportunities in major areas of dementia research, including mixed-etiology dementias, Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal degeneration, vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia, dementia disparities, and dementia nomenclature.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-121
Author(s):  
P Gil-Gregorio ◽  
R Yubero-Pancorbo

SummaryRecently, diagnostic criteria for preclinical Alzheimer's disease have been proposed. These describe and define three stages of disease. Stage I is focused on asymptomatic cerebral amyloidosis. Stage II includes evidence of synaptic dysfunction and/or early degeneration. Finally, stage III of the disease is characterized by the beginning of cognitive decline.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Rosenberg ◽  
Alina Solomon ◽  
Hilkka Soininen ◽  
Pieter Jelle Visser ◽  
Kaj Blennow ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenia S. de Lustig ◽  
Silvia Kohan ◽  
Arturo L. Famulari ◽  
Raul O. Dominguez ◽  
Jorge A. Serra

1996 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Salib ◽  
Valerie Hillier

BackgroundWe examined clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease patients and controls, and collected information from informants, to examine the association between Alzheimer's disease and aluminium occupation.MethodAn unmatched case-control study comparing 198 cases of Alzheimer's disease (ADRDA–NINCDS diagnostic criteria), to selected controls (164 other dementias and 176 non-dementing group) in respect of their occupational history. The subjects included all patients referred to and seen by the first author during a 2 year study period.ResultsTwenty-two of 198 patients with Alzheimer's disease (11.1 %) reported having an aluminium occupation at some stage in their working life compared with 39 of 340 controls (11.5%), odds ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.53–1.75, P > 0.05. Aluminium workers reported to have worked in direct contact with aluminium dust and fumes did not appear to be at any greater risk than other workers who were employed at the same factory, odds ratio 1.19, 95% CI, 0.64–4.18, P > 0.05.ConclusionThere is no evidence to support an association between having previously worked in an aluminium factory and the risk of Alzheimer's disease later in life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document