scholarly journals Correction to: Housing Affordability, Housing Tenure Status and Household Density: Are Housing Characteristics Associated with Union Dissolution?

Author(s):  
Sandra Krapf ◽  
Michael Wagner

A correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-021-09587-z

2017 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 1110-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnes Szabo ◽  
Joanne Allen ◽  
Fiona Alpass ◽  
Christine Stephens

Sleep Health ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-462
Author(s):  
Symielle A. Gaston ◽  
Selena Nguyen-Rodriguez ◽  
Allison E. Aiello ◽  
John McGrath ◽  
W. Braxton Jackson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Clair ◽  
Amanda Hughes

BackgroundThe link between housing and health is well established and long-standing, however much of the evidence relies on self-reported health measures. While these are useful, the availability of biomarker data allows us to add to this evidence using objective indicators of health.MethodsIn this paper, we use C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker associated with infection and stress, alongside information relating to housing details, demographic characteristics and health behaviours taken from the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Hierarchical linear regression models estimate CRP for individual housing characteristics, and all available housing characteristics, controlling for confounders.ResultsResults indicate that housing tenure, type, cost burden and desire to stay in current home are associated with CRP. Private renters have significantly higher (worse) CRP than owners with a mortgage. In terms of housing type, respondents living in detached homes had lower CRP than those in semidetached or terraced houses, or those living in flats. Housing cost burden is associated with lower CRP, although further analysis indicates that this is the case only for low-income renters. Desire to stay in current home is significantly associated with higher CRP.ConclusionsA number of housing characteristics were associated with CRP. These results further support an important role for housing in health.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-391
Author(s):  
Gaetano Lisi

Purpose This paper aims to study the phenomenon known as “house price dispersion”, one of the most important distinctive features of housing markets. House price dispersion refers to the phenomenon of selling two houses with very similar attributes and in near locations at the same time but at very different prices. Design/methodology/approach This theoretical paper makes use of a search and matching model of the housing market. The search and matching models are the benchmark models of the “matching” markets, such as the labour market and the housing market, where trade is a decentralised, uncoordinated and time-consuming economic activity. Findings Unlike the previous related literature that attributes to the heterogeneity of buyers and sellers a significant part of the price volatility, in this paper, the house price dispersion depends on the housing tenure status of home-seekers in the house search process. Indeed, in the presence of different housing tenure status of home-seekers, the house search process leads to different types of matching. In turn, this implies different surpluses (the sum of the net gains of the parties involved in the trade), and eventually, different surpluses produce different prices of equilibrium. Research limitations/implications An interesting research agenda for future works would be an extension of the model to study the effect of “online housing search” on the house search and matching process, and thus, on the house price dispersion. Practical implications The main practical implication of this work is that the house price dispersion is an inherent phenomenon in the house search and matching process. Originality/value None of the existing and related works of research have considered how to take advantage of the search and matching approach to deal with the phenomenon known as “house price dispersion”, without relying on the ex ante heterogeneity of the parties but looking at the “core” of the house search and matching process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-32
Author(s):  
Elina Sutela ◽  
Sampo Ruoppila ◽  
Jarkko Rasinkangas ◽  
Jutta Juvenius

The article analyses how housing affordability is defined in Finnish housing policy. The data consists of laws, policy documents and expert interviews. Three theoretical approaches are identified: normative definitions, consumer choice and definition by housing tenure. Normative definitions that consider affordability as an intersection of household income, housing costs and housing standards are acknowledged, but not treated as policy objectives. Nevertheless, housing allowances are a practical implementation of this approach. The main aim of housing policy – increasing housing supply to support a balanced market – implies that the housing question is to be solved primarily by the market and, consequently, affordability is defined by consumer choice. Social rental housing is often explicitly referred to as “affordable”. However, limiting the question to one tenure is problematic. The article recommends adopting a normative definition as well as better coordination of housing policy, which is now divided between different ministries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document