Selfish genetic elements and sexual selection: their impact on male fertility

Genetica ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom A. R. Price ◽  
Nina Wedell
2013 ◽  
Vol 368 (1613) ◽  
pp. 20120049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Wedell

Selfish genetic elements (SGEs) are ubiquitous in eukaryotes and bacteria, and make up a large part of the genome. They frequently target sperm to increase their transmission success, but these manipulations are often associated with reduced male fertility. Low fertility of SGE-carrying males is suggested to promote polyandry as a female strategy to bias paternity against male carriers. Support for this hypothesis is found in several taxa, where SGE-carrying males have reduced sperm competitive ability. In contrast, when SGEs give rise to reproductive incompatibilities between SGE-carrying males and females, polyandry is not necessarily favoured, irrespective of the detrimental impact on male fertility. This is due to the frequency-dependent nature of these incompatibilities, because they will decrease in the population as the frequency of SGEs increases. However, reduced fertility of SGE-carrying males can prevent the successful population invasion of SGEs. In addition, SGEs can directly influence male and female mating behaviour, mating rates and reproductive traits (e.g. female reproductive tract length and male sperm). This reveals a potent and dynamic interaction between SGEs and polyandry highlighting the potential to generate sexual selection and conflict, but also indicates that polyandry can promote harmony within the genome by undermining the spread of SGEs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 375 (1813) ◽  
pp. 20200067
Author(s):  
Rudi L. Verspoor ◽  
Tom A. R. Price ◽  
Nina Wedell

Selfish genetic elements (SGEs) are diverse and near ubiquitous in Eukaryotes and can be potent drivers of evolution. Here, we discuss SGEs that specifically act on sperm to gain a transmission advantage to the next generation. The diverse SGEs that affect sperm often impose costs on carrier males, including damaging ejaculates, skewing offspring sex ratios and in particular reducing sperm-competitive success of SGE-carrying males. How males and females tolerate and mitigate against these costs is a dynamic and expanding area of research. The intense intra-genomic conflict that these selfish elements generate could also have implications for male fertility and spermatogenesis more widely. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Fifty years of sperm competition’.


2020 ◽  
Vol 375 (1798) ◽  
pp. 20190681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven D. Quistad ◽  
Guilhem Doulcier ◽  
Paul B. Rainey

Microbial communities underpin the Earth's biological and geochemical processes, but their complexity hampers understanding. Motivated by the challenge of diversity and the need to forge ways of capturing dynamical behaviour connecting genes to function, biologically independent experimental communities comprising hundreds of microbial genera were established from garden compost and propagated on nitrogen-limited minimal medium with cellulose (paper) as sole carbon source. After 1 year of bi-weekly transfer, communities retained hundreds of genera. To connect genes to function, we used a simple experimental manipulation that involved the periodic collection of selfish genetic elements (SGEs) from separate communities, followed by pooling and redistribution across communities. The treatment was predicted to promote amplification and dissemination of SGEs and thus horizontal gene transfer. Confirmation came from comparative metagenomics, which showed the substantive movement of ecologically significant genes whose dynamic across space and time could be followed. Enrichment of genes implicated in nitrogen metabolism, and particularly ammonification, prompted biochemical assays that revealed a measurable impact on community function. Our simple experimental strategy offers a conceptually new approach for unravelling dynamical processes affecting microbial community function. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Conceptual challenges in microbial community ecology’.


Science ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 322 (5905) ◽  
pp. 1241-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. R. Price ◽  
D. J. Hodgson ◽  
Z. Lewis ◽  
G. D. D. Hurst ◽  
N. Wedell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document