The resurrection plant Sporobolus stapfianus: An unlikely model for engineering enhanced plant biomass?

2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 217-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia K. Blomstedt ◽  
Cara A. Griffiths ◽  
Dale P. Fredericks ◽  
John D. Hamill ◽  
Donald F. Gaff ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuan Ngoc Le ◽  
Cecilia K. Blomstedt ◽  
Jianbo Kuang ◽  
Jennifer Tenlen ◽  
Donald F. Gaff ◽  
...  

The desiccation tolerant grass Sporobolus stapfianus Gandoger can modulate cellular processes to prevent the imposition of irreversible damage to cellular components by water deficit. The cellular processes conferring this ability are rapidly attenuated by increased water availability. This resurrection plant can quickly restore normal metabolism. Even after loss of more than 95% of its total water content, full rehydration and growth resumption can occur within 24 h. To study the molecular mechanisms of desiccation tolerance in S. stapfianus, a cDNA library constructed from dehydration-stressed leaf tissue, was differentially screened in a manner designed to identify genes with an adaptive role in desiccation tolerance. Further characterisation of four of the genes isolated revealed they are strongly up-regulated by severe dehydration stress and only in desiccation-tolerant tissue, with three of these genes not being expressed at detectable levels in hydrated or dehydrating desiccation-sensitive tissue. The nature of the putative proteins encoded by these genes are suggestive of molecular processes associated with protecting the plant against damage caused by desiccation and include a novel LEA-like protein, and a pore-like protein that may play an important role in peroxisome function during drought stress. A third gene product has similarity to a nuclear-localised protein implicated in chromatin remodelling. In addition, a UDPglucose glucosyltransferase gene has been identified that may play a role in controlling the bioactivity of plant hormones or secondary metabolites during drought stress.


2007 ◽  
Vol 58 (14) ◽  
pp. 3929-3939 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Martinelli ◽  
A. Whittaker ◽  
C. Masclaux-Daubresse ◽  
J. M. Farrant ◽  
F. Brilli ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 1135-1136
Author(s):  
M. F. Quartacci ◽  
M. Forli ◽  
C. Vazzana ◽  
N. Rascio ◽  
F. dalla Vecchia ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 741-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Murelli ◽  
Vittorio Adamo ◽  
Paola Vita Finzi ◽  
Franca Marinone Albini ◽  
Adriana Bochicchio ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franca Marinone Albini ◽  
Carla Murelli ◽  
Giovanni Patritti ◽  
Marco Rovati ◽  
Pietro Zienna ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
AFSHAN ANJUM BABA ◽  
SYED NASEEM UL-ZAFAR GEELANI ◽  
ISHRAT SALEEM ◽  
MOHIT HUSAIN ◽  
PERVEZ AHMAD KHAN ◽  
...  

The plant biomass for protected areas was maximum in summer (1221.56 g/m2) and minimum in winter (290.62 g/m2) as against grazed areas having maximum value 590.81 g/m2 in autumn and minimum 183.75 g/m2 in winter. Study revealed that at Protected site (Kanidajan) the above ground biomass ranged was from a minimum (1.11 t ha-1) in the spring season to a maximum (4.58 t ha-1) in the summer season while at Grazed site (Yousmarag), the aboveground biomass varied from a minimum (0.54 t ha-1) in the spring season to a maximum of 1.48 t ha-1 in summer seasonandat Seed sown site (Badipora), the lowest value of aboveground biomass obtained was 4.46 t ha-1 in spring while as the highest (7.98 t ha-1) was obtained in summer.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1053-1057
Author(s):  
Gavril Budau ◽  
Mihaela Campean ◽  
Camelia Cosereanu ◽  
Dumitru Lica

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document