Normative Revisionism about Student Cheating

Author(s):  
Odysseus Makridis ◽  
Fred Englander
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
pp. 1341-1363
Author(s):  
Martin Dick ◽  
Judithe Sheard ◽  
Maurie Hasen

This chapter adopts a four aspect model to address cheating and plagiarism in universities – education, prevention, detection and consequence. The research focussed on the two aspects of education and prevention as the authors feel that this area has not been considered in detail by the research. Building on past research, a series of eight focus groups (72 students) were conducted with students from information technology degrees at an Australian university. The students were asked to comment and discuss the phenomenon of cheating from their perspective. The chapter presents in detail the responses of the students as analysed by the researchers and then builds a set of guidelines for educators to use in the areas of education and prevention in relation to student cheating.


2019 ◽  
pp. 214-228
Author(s):  
Jason Brennan ◽  
Phillip Magness

This chapter discusses the issue of student cheating. Student cheating is widespread—most cheat a little, and some cheat a lot. Thanks to social desirability bias, surveys give a lower bound on how many and how often students cheat, so the truth is that more students cheat and more often than the surveys indicate. When cheating is this widespread, it is useless to blame character. What is needed is to change the environment in which students find themselves. This means reducing their incentive to cheat and structuring the classroom in such a way as to make cheating more difficult or less likely to pay off. The good news is that once a university develops a reputation for academic honesty among students, this behavior tends to become self-reinforcing. The bad news is that dishonesty is also self-reinforcing. Changing from the bad equilibrium (lots of cheating) to the good one (little cheating) is also difficult.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-127
Author(s):  
Yanina Roshchina

Academic dishonesty, particularly cheating, is a global phenomenon that exists almost in every country. Different methods are developed to deal with student cheating. All of them can be divided into four main directions. Less investigated way is to enhance moral gravity of punishment in case of spotting a fact of cheating (moral cost enhancing). This paper examines the effect of spotting probability decrease and its relationship with moral cost enhancing. Empirical data used in the paper are based on the results of written tests taken by students of economic faculty of MSU. This fact allowed estimating the cheating probability directly instead of using traditional for such papers questionnaire survey. Different factors impacting on the cheating probability were modeled using differencein-differences econometric method. It is shown that moral gravity of punishment for cheating enhancing exerting significant negative influence on cheating probability. Furthermore, such enhancing decreases significance of academic achievement influence on cheating probability. Gender influence on cheating probability was not detected.


2008 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Rettinger ◽  
Yair Kramer
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Sylvie Fontaine ◽  
Eric Frenette ◽  
Marie-Hélène Hébert

AbstractThis article presents the results of a research that aimed to examine the phenomenon of student cheating on exams in faculties of education in Quebec universities. A total of 573 preservice teachers completed an online survey in 2018. The questionnaire consisted of 28 questions with a Likert scale related to individual and contextual factors associated with the propensity to cheat on exams as well as two yes/no items on the arguments for cheating. Descriptive and hierarchical linear regression analyses highlighted the existence of cheating but also how three factors influenced the students’ propensity to cheat: influence of peers, methods of cheating, and institutional context.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document