scholarly journals Assessing the Delivery of Cessation Services to Smokers in Urban, Safety-Net Clinics

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 879-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin C. Mahoney ◽  
Annamaria Masucci Twarozek ◽  
Frances Saad-Harfouche ◽  
Christy Widman ◽  
Deborah O. Erwin ◽  
...  
Pain ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Lange ◽  
Karen E. Lasser ◽  
Ziming Xuan ◽  
Laila Khalid ◽  
Donna Beers ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 264 ◽  
pp. 117-123
Author(s):  
Katherine F Vallès ◽  
Miriam Y Neufeld ◽  
Elisa Caron ◽  
Sabrina E Sanchez ◽  
Tejal S Brahmbhatt

2021 ◽  
pp. 107780122110001
Author(s):  
Paula Tavrow ◽  
Brittnie Bloom ◽  
Mellissa Withers

Identifying intimate partner violence (IPV) in clinics allows for early intervention. We tested a comprehensive approach in five safety-net clinics to encourage female victims to self-identify and providers to screen. The main components were (a) short, multilingual videos for female patients; (b) provider training; and (c) management tools. Although videos were viewed 2,150 times, only 9% of eligible patients watched them. IPV disclosure increased slightly (6%). Lack of internal champions, high turnover, increased patient load, and technological challenges hindered outcomes. Safety-net clinics need feasible methods to encourage IPV screening. Management champions and IT support are essential for video-based activities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Northrup ◽  
Kelley Carroll ◽  
Robert Suchting ◽  
Yolanda R. Villarreal ◽  
Mohammad Zare ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 194-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew B. Bindman ◽  
Kevin Grumbach ◽  
Susannah Bernheim ◽  
Karen Vranizan ◽  
Michael Cousineau

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110177
Author(s):  
Eileen Nehme ◽  
Sierra Castedo de Martell ◽  
Hannah Matthews ◽  
David Lakey

Introduction Clinical settings are being encouraged to identify and address patients’ social needs within the clinic or through partner organizations. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe the current practice of social needs-targeted care in 3 Texas safety net clinics, and facilitators and barriers to adopting new social needs-targeted care tools and practices. Methods Interviews were conducted with staff at 3 safety net clinics serving small and mid-sized communities. Analysis focused on perspectives and decisions around adopting new tools or practices related to social needs-targeted care, including standardized screening tools and community resource referral platforms. Results Nine staff across 3 organizations were interviewed. Two organizations were currently using a standard social needs screening tool in their routine practice, and a third was considering doing so. One organization had adopted a community resource referral platform in partnership with a large community collaboration. Three case studies illustrate a range of facilitators, barriers, perceived benefits, and drawbacks influencing social needs-targeted practices. Benefits of systematic data collection on social needs included the generation of data for community action. Drawbacks include concerns about data privacy. Community resource referral platforms were seen as valuable for creating accountability, but required an influential community partner and adequate community resources. Concerns about disempowering clients and blurring roles were voiced, and potential to increase provider job satisfaction was identified. Conclusions Benefits and drawbacks of adopting new tools and practices related to social needs-targeted care are strongly influenced by the community context. For the adoption of community resource referral platforms, the outer setting is particularly relevant; adoption readiness is best assessed at the community or regional level rather than the clinic system level. While screening tools are much easier than referral platforms for clinics to adopt, the ability to address identified needs remains heavily based on the outer setting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document