scholarly journals Erratum to: Preparing Students for Middle School Through After-School STEM Activities

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 898-898
Author(s):  
Nancy P. Moreno ◽  
Barbara Z. Tharp ◽  
Gregory Vogt ◽  
Alana D. Newell ◽  
Christopher A. Burnett
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Jill Denner ◽  
Steve Bean

One way to increase women’s participation in technology is to create more female independent problem solvers on the computer, or what Sherry Turkle (cited in Margolis & Fisher, 2002) calls “intrepid explorers.” Studies of students who persist in computer science have shown the importance of being “intrepid”—having the desire to explore without fear of breaking the computer, and the confidence to solve problems and deal with setbacks (Margolis & Fisher, 2002). An intrepid explorer is creative and fearless about trying new things on the computer. However, how do people become intrepid explorers? How can learning environments support them? This article addresses these questions by describing ways to support girls to explore intrepidly on computers. These strategies are grounded in previous research as well as our own research on an after school program for middle school girls.


2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 2156759X0500900
Author(s):  
Theresa Kruczek ◽  
Charlene M. Alexander ◽  
Kevin Harris

There are a number of middle school students who experience difficulty making the transition from childhood to early adolescence and may be described as high-risk. This article describes an after-school program designed to promote healthy identity and adaptive personal choice behaviors in a high-risk group of middle school students.


2003 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven B. Mertens ◽  
Nancy Flowers ◽  
Peter F. Mulhall

2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi M. King ◽  
Roberta J. Ogletree ◽  
Joyce V. Fetro ◽  
Stephen L. Brown ◽  
Julie A. Partridge

2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 326-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne C. Miller ◽  
Michelle Hering ◽  
Carrie Cothran ◽  
Kim Croteau ◽  
Rebecca Dunlap

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 310-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Dzewaltowski ◽  
Konstantinos Karteroliotis ◽  
Greg Welk ◽  
Judy A. Johnston ◽  
Dan Nyaronga ◽  
...  

This study developed youth self-efficacy (SEPA) and proxy efficacy (PEPA) measures for physical activity (PA). Proxy efficacy was defined as a youth’s confidence in his or her skills and abilities to get others to act in one’s interests to create supportive environments for PA. Each spring of their sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade years, middle school students completed SEPA and PEPA questions and then, for 3 days, recalled their previous day’s after-school PA. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a four-factor structure (SEPA for 1–3 days, SEPA for 5–7 days, PEPA-Parents, PEPA-School). Across study years, SEPA 1–3 days and 5–7 days increased and PEPA-Parents and PEPA-School decreased. Initial levels of PEPA-Parents and SEPA scales were associated with initial levels of PA. From sixth through seventh grade, changes in SEPA scales were associated with changes in PA. Studies should test whether interventions targeting self-efficacy and proxy efficacy influence PA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document